L'etat, C'est Moi:为何南非各省的政府内部争议仍未受最终宪法和政府间关系框架法案管辖,以及我们如何才能最好地解决这些争议

S. Woolman
{"title":"L'etat, C'est Moi:为何南非各省的政府内部争议仍未受最终宪法和政府间关系框架法案管辖,以及我们如何才能最好地解决这些争议","authors":"S. Woolman","doi":"10.4314/LDD.V13I1.54805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For years, lawyers, jurists and academics bemoaned a great gaping hole in our law : the Final Constitution had promised to establish a legal regime to mediate and to resolve intergovernmental conflicts. (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996)(\"Final Constitution\" or \"FC\"). During the first decade of post-apartheid South African life (1996 - 2005), Parliament failed to make good FC s 41(2)'s guarantee that intergovernmental disputes would be resolved by legislation that prevented different spheres of government and opposing organs of state from going to war (or court) over vital policy matters.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L'etat, C'est Moi: Why provincial Intra-governmental disputes in South Africa remain ungoverned by the final constitution and the Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act - and how we can best resolve them\",\"authors\":\"S. Woolman\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/LDD.V13I1.54805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For years, lawyers, jurists and academics bemoaned a great gaping hole in our law : the Final Constitution had promised to establish a legal regime to mediate and to resolve intergovernmental conflicts. (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996)(\\\"Final Constitution\\\" or \\\"FC\\\"). During the first decade of post-apartheid South African life (1996 - 2005), Parliament failed to make good FC s 41(2)'s guarantee that intergovernmental disputes would be resolved by legislation that prevented different spheres of government and opposing organs of state from going to war (or court) over vital policy matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Democracy and Development\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Democracy and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V13I1.54805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V13I1.54805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

多年来,律师、法学家和学者哀叹我国法律的一个巨大漏洞:《最终宪法》承诺建立一个法律制度来调解和解决政府间冲突。1996年南非共和国宪法(1996年第108号法令)(“最终宪法”或“FC”)。在南非种族隔离后的第一个十年(1996 - 2005),议会未能履行《宪法》第41(2)条的保证,即通过立法解决政府间争端,防止政府的不同领域和对立的国家机构就重要的政策问题诉诸战争(或法庭)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L'etat, C'est Moi: Why provincial Intra-governmental disputes in South Africa remain ungoverned by the final constitution and the Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act - and how we can best resolve them
For years, lawyers, jurists and academics bemoaned a great gaping hole in our law : the Final Constitution had promised to establish a legal regime to mediate and to resolve intergovernmental conflicts. (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996)("Final Constitution" or "FC"). During the first decade of post-apartheid South African life (1996 - 2005), Parliament failed to make good FC s 41(2)'s guarantee that intergovernmental disputes would be resolved by legislation that prevented different spheres of government and opposing organs of state from going to war (or court) over vital policy matters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A critique of the efficacy of the right to shelter for street children in Kenya A critical analysis of Massmart Holdings and Others v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union [2022] ZALCJHB 119 The rights of women in unregistered customary marriages in Zimbabwe: Best practices from South Africa Eliminating racial discrimination of employees: An assessment of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended A turning-point for transitional justice? Political violence in Zimbabwe, and transformative justice as a way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1