AFDX网络中更紧的缓冲区尺寸

Nassima Benammar, Henri Bauer, F. Ridouard, P. Richard
{"title":"AFDX网络中更紧的缓冲区尺寸","authors":"Nassima Benammar, Henri Bauer, F. Ridouard, P. Richard","doi":"10.1145/3015037.3015043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The AFDX (Avionics Full DupleX Switched Ethernet) is the backbone network of most recent avionic communication systems. These systems require deterministic buffer dimensioning for certification reasons. As in such systems, static design is often preferred over dynamic allocation, a dimensioning in terms of frames rather than in terms of bits can be required.\n A common approach consists in deriving the worst-case buffer size in terms of frames from the worst-case in bits. However, we show that this can lead to an overestimation of the buffer size. Thus, we propose a dedicated approach for a tighter dimensioning. Eventually, the two approaches are compared on a sample AFDX configuration.","PeriodicalId":447904,"journal":{"name":"SIGBED Rev.","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tighter buffer dimensioning in AFDX networks\",\"authors\":\"Nassima Benammar, Henri Bauer, F. Ridouard, P. Richard\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3015037.3015043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The AFDX (Avionics Full DupleX Switched Ethernet) is the backbone network of most recent avionic communication systems. These systems require deterministic buffer dimensioning for certification reasons. As in such systems, static design is often preferred over dynamic allocation, a dimensioning in terms of frames rather than in terms of bits can be required.\\n A common approach consists in deriving the worst-case buffer size in terms of frames from the worst-case in bits. However, we show that this can lead to an overestimation of the buffer size. Thus, we propose a dedicated approach for a tighter dimensioning. Eventually, the two approaches are compared on a sample AFDX configuration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGBED Rev.\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGBED Rev.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3015037.3015043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGBED Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3015037.3015043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

AFDX(航空电子全双工交换以太网)是最新航空电子通信系统的骨干网络。由于认证原因,这些系统需要确定缓冲尺寸。在这样的系统中,静态设计通常优于动态分配,可能需要根据帧而不是根据比特进行尺寸划分。一种常见的方法是从最坏情况下的比特数中得到以帧为单位的最坏情况缓冲区大小。然而,我们表明这可能导致对缓冲区大小的高估。因此,我们提出了一种专用的方法来实现更严格的维度。最后,在示例AFDX配置上比较了这两种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tighter buffer dimensioning in AFDX networks
The AFDX (Avionics Full DupleX Switched Ethernet) is the backbone network of most recent avionic communication systems. These systems require deterministic buffer dimensioning for certification reasons. As in such systems, static design is often preferred over dynamic allocation, a dimensioning in terms of frames rather than in terms of bits can be required. A common approach consists in deriving the worst-case buffer size in terms of frames from the worst-case in bits. However, we show that this can lead to an overestimation of the buffer size. Thus, we propose a dedicated approach for a tighter dimensioning. Eventually, the two approaches are compared on a sample AFDX configuration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A preliminary roadmap for dependability research in fog computing Routing heuristics for load-balanced transmission in TSN-based networks Symphony: routing aware scheduling for DSME networks Boosting read-ahead efficiency for improved user experience on mobile devices Container-based real-time scheduling in the Linux kernel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1