M. A. Slabospitskii, D. Mokhov, V. V. Limarev, P. V. Tkachenko, A. N. Tkachenko, D. Mansurov, V. M. Khaydarov
{"title":"验证作者提出的肩关节手动复位方法的经济效益","authors":"M. A. Slabospitskii, D. Mokhov, V. V. Limarev, P. V. Tkachenko, A. N. Tkachenko, D. Mansurov, V. M. Khaydarov","doi":"10.32885/2220-0975-2022-3-103-113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Shoulder joint′s dislocation stands first among all dislocations. Assistance to patients with dislocation of the shoulder carries out both outpatient and inpatient. The cost of inpatient treatment is many times higher than that of outpatient care.The aim of the study is to substantiate the economic efficiency of the author′s manual technique for shoulder dislocation repositioning.Materials and methods. The study is longitudinal from 2013 to 2020 inclusive, the sample is continuous, the place of the study is the trauma center of the City Hospital № 1 N. I. Pirogov. Criteria for inclusion of patients in the study — primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total — 1 968 people. Non-inclusion criteria — secondary dislocation. Successful repositioning of shoulder dislocation on an outpatient basis was performed in 1 159 (58,9 %) patients; after unsuccessful repositioning, 809 (41,1 %) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. Outpatient patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1 — patients (n=1 552) underwent reduction of the dislocation using traditional methods using local anesthesia, in group 2 patients (n=416) the author′s manual technique was used without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in an inpatient setting. The use of manual techniques was effective in 84,6 % of cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15,4 %).Results. Comparison of the cost of treatment was carried out on the basis of the Tariff Agreement in the compulsory medical insurance system of the Sevastopol city dated December 20, 2021: the cost of treating one patient with shoulder dislocation in the traumatology department (13 582,49 rubles) is 13,3 times more than in the trauma center (1 019,5 rub). The effectiveness of the author′s manual technique is 1,63 times higher than the use of standard reduction methods using local anesthesia.Conclusion. The use of the author′s manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation on an outpatient basis has a higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance on an outpatient basis, the cost of this service is much cheaper than inpatient treatment. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treating of this category of patients.","PeriodicalId":110947,"journal":{"name":"Russian Osteopathic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substantiation of the economic efficiency of the author′s manual repositioning method of the shoulder joint\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Slabospitskii, D. Mokhov, V. V. Limarev, P. V. Tkachenko, A. N. Tkachenko, D. Mansurov, V. M. Khaydarov\",\"doi\":\"10.32885/2220-0975-2022-3-103-113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Shoulder joint′s dislocation stands first among all dislocations. Assistance to patients with dislocation of the shoulder carries out both outpatient and inpatient. The cost of inpatient treatment is many times higher than that of outpatient care.The aim of the study is to substantiate the economic efficiency of the author′s manual technique for shoulder dislocation repositioning.Materials and methods. The study is longitudinal from 2013 to 2020 inclusive, the sample is continuous, the place of the study is the trauma center of the City Hospital № 1 N. I. Pirogov. Criteria for inclusion of patients in the study — primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total — 1 968 people. Non-inclusion criteria — secondary dislocation. Successful repositioning of shoulder dislocation on an outpatient basis was performed in 1 159 (58,9 %) patients; after unsuccessful repositioning, 809 (41,1 %) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. Outpatient patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1 — patients (n=1 552) underwent reduction of the dislocation using traditional methods using local anesthesia, in group 2 patients (n=416) the author′s manual technique was used without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in an inpatient setting. The use of manual techniques was effective in 84,6 % of cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15,4 %).Results. Comparison of the cost of treatment was carried out on the basis of the Tariff Agreement in the compulsory medical insurance system of the Sevastopol city dated December 20, 2021: the cost of treating one patient with shoulder dislocation in the traumatology department (13 582,49 rubles) is 13,3 times more than in the trauma center (1 019,5 rub). The effectiveness of the author′s manual technique is 1,63 times higher than the use of standard reduction methods using local anesthesia.Conclusion. The use of the author′s manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation on an outpatient basis has a higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance on an outpatient basis, the cost of this service is much cheaper than inpatient treatment. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treating of this category of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Osteopathic Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Osteopathic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2022-3-103-113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Osteopathic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2022-3-103-113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。肩关节脱位是所有脱位中最常见的。协助患者肩关节脱位进行门诊和住院。住院治疗的费用比门诊治疗高出许多倍。本研究的目的是证实作者的手手法对肩关节脱位复位的经济效益。材料和方法。本研究是纵向的,从2013年到2020年,包括样本是连续的,研究地点是城市医院的创伤中心N. I. Pirogov。纳入研究患者的标准-原发性肩关节脱位。闭合性外伤性肩关节脱位共确诊1968例。未纳入标准-继发性脱位。1 159例(58.9%)患者在门诊成功完成肩关节脱位复位;复位失败后,809例(41.1%)患者因肩关节脱位住院。门诊患者随机分为2组:1组1 552例患者采用传统方法局部麻醉复位脱位,2组416例患者采用作者手工手法不采用局部麻醉复位脱位。两组患者的性别、年龄、脱位类型差异无统计学意义。传统方法加局部麻醉的有效性为52%(807例脱位复位),其余患者住院治疗。352例(84.6%)患者采用手工手法治疗,住院64例(15.4%)。根据2021年12月20日塞瓦斯托波尔市强制医疗保险制度中的关税协定对治疗费用进行了比较:在创伤科治疗一名肩部脱臼患者的费用(13 582,49卢布)是创伤中心(1 019,5卢布)的13.3倍。作者手工手法的有效性是采用局麻标准复位方法的1.63倍。与传统方法相比,在门诊使用作者的手工技术治疗肩关节脱位患者具有更高的效率,因为更多的患者在门诊接受帮助,这种服务的费用比住院治疗便宜得多。此外,这类治疗不需要麻醉,这也降低了这类患者的治疗成本。
Substantiation of the economic efficiency of the author′s manual repositioning method of the shoulder joint
Introduction. Shoulder joint′s dislocation stands first among all dislocations. Assistance to patients with dislocation of the shoulder carries out both outpatient and inpatient. The cost of inpatient treatment is many times higher than that of outpatient care.The aim of the study is to substantiate the economic efficiency of the author′s manual technique for shoulder dislocation repositioning.Materials and methods. The study is longitudinal from 2013 to 2020 inclusive, the sample is continuous, the place of the study is the trauma center of the City Hospital № 1 N. I. Pirogov. Criteria for inclusion of patients in the study — primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total — 1 968 people. Non-inclusion criteria — secondary dislocation. Successful repositioning of shoulder dislocation on an outpatient basis was performed in 1 159 (58,9 %) patients; after unsuccessful repositioning, 809 (41,1 %) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. Outpatient patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1 — patients (n=1 552) underwent reduction of the dislocation using traditional methods using local anesthesia, in group 2 patients (n=416) the author′s manual technique was used without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in an inpatient setting. The use of manual techniques was effective in 84,6 % of cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15,4 %).Results. Comparison of the cost of treatment was carried out on the basis of the Tariff Agreement in the compulsory medical insurance system of the Sevastopol city dated December 20, 2021: the cost of treating one patient with shoulder dislocation in the traumatology department (13 582,49 rubles) is 13,3 times more than in the trauma center (1 019,5 rub). The effectiveness of the author′s manual technique is 1,63 times higher than the use of standard reduction methods using local anesthesia.Conclusion. The use of the author′s manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation on an outpatient basis has a higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance on an outpatient basis, the cost of this service is much cheaper than inpatient treatment. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treating of this category of patients.