被调查者行为率估计模型:贝叶斯网络结构综合

A. Suvorova
{"title":"被调查者行为率估计模型:贝叶斯网络结构综合","authors":"A. Suvorova","doi":"10.1109/SCM.2017.7970503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper described the structure comparison of Bayesian Belief Network models for individual behavior rate estimate based on data about the last episodes of that behavior. We compared two types of network structures: expert-based and data-based. For model learning and evaluation we used data from social network VKontakte about episodes of publishing posts. The sample size was 3803 users with 785066 posts in total for the half-year period; training dataset included 75% of the sample, the rest 25% were used as test dataset. The data-based structure represented slightly better quality scores, while prediction quality was almost the same: 90.5% accuracy for model with expert-based structure and 89.6% accuracy for data-based model. Hence, both models showed quite similar results that allows, for example, reducing computations and applying expert-based structure for solving practical issues.","PeriodicalId":315574,"journal":{"name":"2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models for respondents' behavior rate estimate: Bayesian Network structure synthesis\",\"authors\":\"A. Suvorova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCM.2017.7970503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper described the structure comparison of Bayesian Belief Network models for individual behavior rate estimate based on data about the last episodes of that behavior. We compared two types of network structures: expert-based and data-based. For model learning and evaluation we used data from social network VKontakte about episodes of publishing posts. The sample size was 3803 users with 785066 posts in total for the half-year period; training dataset included 75% of the sample, the rest 25% were used as test dataset. The data-based structure represented slightly better quality scores, while prediction quality was almost the same: 90.5% accuracy for model with expert-based structure and 89.6% accuracy for data-based model. Hence, both models showed quite similar results that allows, for example, reducing computations and applying expert-based structure for solving practical issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCM.2017.7970503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCM.2017.7970503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文描述了贝叶斯信念网络模型的结构比较,该模型基于个体行为最近事件的数据进行了个体行为率估计。我们比较了两种类型的网络结构:基于专家的和基于数据的。对于模型学习和评估,我们使用了来自社交网络VKontakte的关于发布帖子集的数据。样本量为3803个用户,半年共785066个帖子;训练数据集包含75%的样本,其余25%作为测试数据集。基于数据结构的模型质量分数略高,而预测质量几乎相同:基于专家结构的模型准确率为90.5%,基于数据的模型准确率为89.6%。因此,这两个模型显示出非常相似的结果,例如,减少计算和应用基于专家的结构来解决实际问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Models for respondents' behavior rate estimate: Bayesian Network structure synthesis
The paper described the structure comparison of Bayesian Belief Network models for individual behavior rate estimate based on data about the last episodes of that behavior. We compared two types of network structures: expert-based and data-based. For model learning and evaluation we used data from social network VKontakte about episodes of publishing posts. The sample size was 3803 users with 785066 posts in total for the half-year period; training dataset included 75% of the sample, the rest 25% were used as test dataset. The data-based structure represented slightly better quality scores, while prediction quality was almost the same: 90.5% accuracy for model with expert-based structure and 89.6% accuracy for data-based model. Hence, both models showed quite similar results that allows, for example, reducing computations and applying expert-based structure for solving practical issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fuzzy model assessing the index of development of sustainable marketing of the company Bayesian approach in strategic management accounting and audit Comparing of systems of PCB routers Classification of information's uncertainty in system research Applying machine learning techniques to mine ventilation control systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1