默克公司诉吉利德科学公司案Samuel L. Bray法庭之友支持上诉人意见书

Samuel L. Bray
{"title":"默克公司诉吉利德科学公司案Samuel L. Bray法庭之友支持上诉人意见书","authors":"Samuel L. Bray","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3272600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the long-standing maxims of equity is that “he who comes into equity must come with clean hands.” It is closely related to the maxim that “he who seeks equity must do equity.” These equitable principles are “an historical reflection of the fact that courts of equity began as courts of conscience.” In this country and throughout the common law world, unclean hands has tradition- ally been a defense to equitable claims, but not to legal claims. \nYet in the case below the Federal Circuit applied the equitable defense of unclean hands to a legal claim for damages for patent infringement. The Federal Circuit repeatedly relied on precedents of this Court that characterize unclean hands as an equitable defense that constrains a court of equity. The Federal Circuit provided no support whatsoever for applying the equitable defense of unclean hands to a legal claim for damages, especially when that equitable defense would displace the verdict of a jury.","PeriodicalId":344388,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief for Samuel L. Bray as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Merck & Co. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel L. Bray\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3272600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the long-standing maxims of equity is that “he who comes into equity must come with clean hands.” It is closely related to the maxim that “he who seeks equity must do equity.” These equitable principles are “an historical reflection of the fact that courts of equity began as courts of conscience.” In this country and throughout the common law world, unclean hands has tradition- ally been a defense to equitable claims, but not to legal claims. \\nYet in the case below the Federal Circuit applied the equitable defense of unclean hands to a legal claim for damages for patent infringement. The Federal Circuit repeatedly relied on precedents of this Court that characterize unclean hands as an equitable defense that constrains a court of equity. The Federal Circuit provided no support whatsoever for applying the equitable defense of unclean hands to a legal claim for damages, especially when that equitable defense would displace the verdict of a jury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3272600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3272600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期存在的公平格言之一是“进入公平的人必须两手干净”。这与“求公平者必行公平”的格言密切相关。这些公平原则是“衡平法院最初是良心法庭这一事实的历史反映”。在这个国家和整个普通法世界,不洁之手传统上一直是衡平法要求的辩护理由,而不是法律要求的辩护理由。然而,在下面的案件中,联邦巡回法院将手不干净的公平抗辩适用于专利侵权损害赔偿的法律索赔。联邦巡回法院反复引用本院的先例,将不洁手定性为限制衡平法院的公平抗辩。联邦巡回法院对将不洁手的衡平法抗辩适用于损害赔偿的法律索赔没有提供任何支持,特别是当这种衡平法抗辩将取代陪审团的裁决时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brief for Samuel L. Bray as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Merck & Co. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
One of the long-standing maxims of equity is that “he who comes into equity must come with clean hands.” It is closely related to the maxim that “he who seeks equity must do equity.” These equitable principles are “an historical reflection of the fact that courts of equity began as courts of conscience.” In this country and throughout the common law world, unclean hands has tradition- ally been a defense to equitable claims, but not to legal claims. Yet in the case below the Federal Circuit applied the equitable defense of unclean hands to a legal claim for damages for patent infringement. The Federal Circuit repeatedly relied on precedents of this Court that characterize unclean hands as an equitable defense that constrains a court of equity. The Federal Circuit provided no support whatsoever for applying the equitable defense of unclean hands to a legal claim for damages, especially when that equitable defense would displace the verdict of a jury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Observing Online Courts: Lessons from the Pandemic Discovery as Regulation Section 89 of the CPC: ADR and Business Disputes. Brief for Samuel L. Bray as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Merck & Co. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Adversarial Persuasion with Cross-Examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1