人机交互中的AI偏见:性别偏见机器人的风险评估

Tom Hitron, Benny Megidish, Etay Todress, Noa Morag, H. Erel
{"title":"人机交互中的AI偏见:性别偏见机器人的风险评估","authors":"Tom Hitron, Benny Megidish, Etay Todress, Noa Morag, H. Erel","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With recent advancements in AI, there are growing concerns about human biases implemented in AI decisions. Threats posed by AI bias may be even more drastic when applied to robots that are perceived as independent entities and are not mediated by humans. Furthermore, technology is typically perceived as objective and there is a risk that people will embrace its decisions without considering possible biases. In order to understand the extent of threats brought about by such biases, we evaluated participants’ responses to a gender-biased robot mediating a debate between two participants (male and female). The vast majority of participants did not associate the robot’s behavior with a bias, despite being informed that the robot’s algorithm is based on human examples. Participants attributed the robot’s decisions to their own performance and used explanations involving gender stereotypes. Our findings suggest that robots’ biased behaviors can serve as validation for common human stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":250997,"journal":{"name":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI bias in Human-Robot Interaction: An evaluation of the Risk in Gender Biased Robots\",\"authors\":\"Tom Hitron, Benny Megidish, Etay Todress, Noa Morag, H. Erel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With recent advancements in AI, there are growing concerns about human biases implemented in AI decisions. Threats posed by AI bias may be even more drastic when applied to robots that are perceived as independent entities and are not mediated by humans. Furthermore, technology is typically perceived as objective and there is a risk that people will embrace its decisions without considering possible biases. In order to understand the extent of threats brought about by such biases, we evaluated participants’ responses to a gender-biased robot mediating a debate between two participants (male and female). The vast majority of participants did not associate the robot’s behavior with a bias, despite being informed that the robot’s algorithm is based on human examples. Participants attributed the robot’s decisions to their own performance and used explanations involving gender stereotypes. Our findings suggest that robots’ biased behaviors can serve as validation for common human stereotypes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随着人工智能的进步,人们越来越担心人工智能决策中存在的人类偏见。当应用于被视为独立实体且不受人类调节的机器人时,人工智能偏见带来的威胁可能会更加严重。此外,技术通常被认为是客观的,人们有可能不考虑可能存在的偏见就接受它的决定。为了了解这种偏见带来的威胁程度,我们评估了参与者对性别偏见机器人调解两名参与者(男性和女性)之间辩论的反应。尽管被告知机器人的算法是基于人类的例子,但绝大多数参与者并没有将机器人的行为与偏见联系起来。参与者将机器人的决定归因于他们自己的表现,并使用了涉及性别刻板印象的解释。我们的研究结果表明,机器人的偏见行为可以作为对人类普遍刻板印象的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI bias in Human-Robot Interaction: An evaluation of the Risk in Gender Biased Robots
With recent advancements in AI, there are growing concerns about human biases implemented in AI decisions. Threats posed by AI bias may be even more drastic when applied to robots that are perceived as independent entities and are not mediated by humans. Furthermore, technology is typically perceived as objective and there is a risk that people will embrace its decisions without considering possible biases. In order to understand the extent of threats brought about by such biases, we evaluated participants’ responses to a gender-biased robot mediating a debate between two participants (male and female). The vast majority of participants did not associate the robot’s behavior with a bias, despite being informed that the robot’s algorithm is based on human examples. Participants attributed the robot’s decisions to their own performance and used explanations involving gender stereotypes. Our findings suggest that robots’ biased behaviors can serve as validation for common human stereotypes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I Can’t Believe That Happened! : Exploring Expressivity in Collaborative Storytelling with the Tabletop Robot Haru Nothing About Us Without Us: a participatory design for an Inclusive Signing Tiago Robot Preliminary Investigation of Collision Risk Assessment with Vision for Selecting Targets Paid Attention to by Mobile Robot Step-by-Step Task Plan Explanations Beyond Causal Links Contributions of user tests in a Living Lab in the co-design process of human robot interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1