坦桑尼亚坦噶市坦噶乳业合作联盟中心收集的牛奶中抗生素残留的评估

R. Ryoba, L. Kweka, R. Kazwala, L. Kurwijila
{"title":"坦桑尼亚坦噶市坦噶乳业合作联盟中心收集的牛奶中抗生素残留的评估","authors":"R. Ryoba, L. Kweka, R. Kazwala, L. Kurwijila","doi":"10.4314/TVJ.V24I1.42013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study on drug residues content was done on milk received by Tanga Dairy Cooperative Union in Tanga municipality. Milk samples (384) were collected from 96 farmers on four consecutive days. Forty two of the sampled farmers were interviewed using a questionnaire. The Charm- Aim-96 test which detects permitted maximum residue limits was used. Results showed that out of 384 screened milk samples, 42.7% were found\npositive for antibiotic residues while 57.3% were negative. About 65% of the farmers had at least one of their milk samples testing positive while 32.3% tested negative. Of the interviewed farmers, 59.5% had at least one positive sample. Farmers did not differ significantly (p>0.05) in all management characteristics and factors/practices which could result in milk antibiotic residues. The number of milking cows, type of commonly\nencountered diseases and the lack of proper advise on withdrawal periods were found to be significantly (p Tanzania Veterinary Journal Vol. 24 (1) 2007: pp.38-51","PeriodicalId":181497,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Veterinary Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment Of Antibiotic Residues In Milk Collected At Tanga Dairy Cooperative Union Centre In Tanga Municipality, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"R. Ryoba, L. Kweka, R. Kazwala, L. Kurwijila\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/TVJ.V24I1.42013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A study on drug residues content was done on milk received by Tanga Dairy Cooperative Union in Tanga municipality. Milk samples (384) were collected from 96 farmers on four consecutive days. Forty two of the sampled farmers were interviewed using a questionnaire. The Charm- Aim-96 test which detects permitted maximum residue limits was used. Results showed that out of 384 screened milk samples, 42.7% were found\\npositive for antibiotic residues while 57.3% were negative. About 65% of the farmers had at least one of their milk samples testing positive while 32.3% tested negative. Of the interviewed farmers, 59.5% had at least one positive sample. Farmers did not differ significantly (p>0.05) in all management characteristics and factors/practices which could result in milk antibiotic residues. The number of milking cows, type of commonly\\nencountered diseases and the lack of proper advise on withdrawal periods were found to be significantly (p Tanzania Veterinary Journal Vol. 24 (1) 2007: pp.38-51\",\"PeriodicalId\":181497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanzania Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanzania Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/TVJ.V24I1.42013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/TVJ.V24I1.42013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对坦噶市坦噶乳业合作联盟接收的牛奶进行了药物残留研究。连续4天采集96个奶农的384份奶样。对42名抽样农民进行了问卷调查。使用Charm- Aim-96检测允许最大残留限量。结果显示,384份筛选的牛奶样品中,抗生素残留阳性率为42.7%,阴性率为57.3%。约65%的奶农至少有一份牛奶样本检测呈阳性,32.3%的奶农检测呈阴性。受访农民中,59.5%至少有一个阳性样本。奶农在所有可能导致牛奶抗生素残留的管理特征和因素/做法上无显著差异(p>0.05)。发现挤奶奶牛的数量、常见疾病的类型和缺乏关于停奶期的适当建议是显著的(p坦桑尼亚兽医杂志2007年第24卷第1期:第38-51页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment Of Antibiotic Residues In Milk Collected At Tanga Dairy Cooperative Union Centre In Tanga Municipality, Tanzania
A study on drug residues content was done on milk received by Tanga Dairy Cooperative Union in Tanga municipality. Milk samples (384) were collected from 96 farmers on four consecutive days. Forty two of the sampled farmers were interviewed using a questionnaire. The Charm- Aim-96 test which detects permitted maximum residue limits was used. Results showed that out of 384 screened milk samples, 42.7% were found positive for antibiotic residues while 57.3% were negative. About 65% of the farmers had at least one of their milk samples testing positive while 32.3% tested negative. Of the interviewed farmers, 59.5% had at least one positive sample. Farmers did not differ significantly (p>0.05) in all management characteristics and factors/practices which could result in milk antibiotic residues. The number of milking cows, type of commonly encountered diseases and the lack of proper advise on withdrawal periods were found to be significantly (p Tanzania Veterinary Journal Vol. 24 (1) 2007: pp.38-51
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sero-prevalence of brucellosis in ruminants and awareness of stakeholders on the disease in wet markets in Maswa district, Tanzania Cross Sectional Study of Small East African Goat Ovarian Morphology During Wet and Dry Seasons A Comparative Study of Productive and Reproductive Performance between Mpwapwa Breed Cattle and Their Crosses Quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in wildlife ungulates in Ngorongoro Conservation area and Mikumi National Park, Tanzania Comparative Evaluation of Growth Performance and Feed Utilization of Improved Nigerian Indigenous Broiler and Different Crossbreds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1