丹麦哲学年鉴

Con Tents, Sergio Cremaschi, Rasmus Dyring, Andreas Melson Gregersen, Søren Riis, Carl Erik Kühl, Carl Erik Kühl
{"title":"丹麦哲学年鉴","authors":"Con Tents, Sergio Cremaschi, Rasmus Dyring, Andreas Melson Gregersen, Søren Riis, Carl Erik Kühl, Carl Erik Kühl","doi":"10.1163/24689300-54010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of truthmakers for negative propositions was introduced by Bertrand Russell in 1918. Since then the debate has mostly been concerned with whether to accept or reject their existence, and little has been said about what it is that makes a negative proposition negative. This is a problem as it is obvious that you cannot just read it off from the grammar of a sentence. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that propositions may be negative or positive in many ways: it offers a typology, and shows how the question of the existence of negative facts will receive a different answer depending on its relationship to that typology.","PeriodicalId":202424,"journal":{"name":"Danish Yearbook of Philosophy","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Danish Yearbook of Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"Con Tents, Sergio Cremaschi, Rasmus Dyring, Andreas Melson Gregersen, Søren Riis, Carl Erik Kühl, Carl Erik Kühl\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/24689300-54010002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of truthmakers for negative propositions was introduced by Bertrand Russell in 1918. Since then the debate has mostly been concerned with whether to accept or reject their existence, and little has been said about what it is that makes a negative proposition negative. This is a problem as it is obvious that you cannot just read it off from the grammar of a sentence. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that propositions may be negative or positive in many ways: it offers a typology, and shows how the question of the existence of negative facts will receive a different answer depending on its relationship to that typology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish Yearbook of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish Yearbook of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-54010002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish Yearbook of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-54010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

否定命题的真理制造者问题是由伯特兰·罗素在1918年提出的。从那以后,争论主要集中在是否接受或拒绝它们的存在,很少有人说是什么使一个否定命题成为否定的。这是一个问题,因为很明显,你不能仅仅从句子的语法中读出它。本文的目的是证明命题在许多方面可能是否定的或肯定的:它提供了一个类型学,并展示了否定事实存在的问题如何根据其与该类型学的关系得到不同的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Danish Yearbook of Philosophy
The problem of truthmakers for negative propositions was introduced by Bertrand Russell in 1918. Since then the debate has mostly been concerned with whether to accept or reject their existence, and little has been said about what it is that makes a negative proposition negative. This is a problem as it is obvious that you cannot just read it off from the grammar of a sentence. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that propositions may be negative or positive in many ways: it offers a typology, and shows how the question of the existence of negative facts will receive a different answer depending on its relationship to that typology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Science in a World of Politics Strong Scientific Meritocratism: Standpoint Epistemology as a Middle Ground in the Debate over Personal Merit in Science Should Liberal Communities Respect Bad Believers? On Empirical Disagreement over Climate Change and Public Reason Understanding Meaning through Human Evolution The Radical Demand in Løgstrup’s Ethics, written by Robert Stern
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1