{"title":"MIMO-OFDM系统QRD-M检测与球体解码的比较研究","authors":"Yongmei Dai, Sumei Sun, Z. Lei","doi":"10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a comparative study of two tree search based detection algorithms, namely, the M-algorithm combined with QR decomposition (QRD-M) and the sphere decoding (SD) algorithms, for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. First, we show that nodes ordering before and during the tree search are important for both algorithms. With appropriate ordering, QRD-M can improve detection performance significantly and SD can reduce decoding complexity substantially. Then we compare the implementation complexity of the two algorithms, in terms of the number of nodes required to search or the required number of multiplications to achieve maximum likelihood detection performance. It is interesting to show that the average complexity of SD is lower than that of QRD-M, whereas the worst case complexity of SD is much higher than that of QRD-M","PeriodicalId":248766,"journal":{"name":"2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of QRD-M Detection and Sphere Decoding for MIMO-OFDM Systems\",\"authors\":\"Yongmei Dai, Sumei Sun, Z. Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a comparative study of two tree search based detection algorithms, namely, the M-algorithm combined with QR decomposition (QRD-M) and the sphere decoding (SD) algorithms, for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. First, we show that nodes ordering before and during the tree search are important for both algorithms. With appropriate ordering, QRD-M can improve detection performance significantly and SD can reduce decoding complexity substantially. Then we compare the implementation complexity of the two algorithms, in terms of the number of nodes required to search or the required number of multiplications to achieve maximum likelihood detection performance. It is interesting to show that the average complexity of SD is lower than that of QRD-M, whereas the worst case complexity of SD is much higher than that of QRD-M\",\"PeriodicalId\":248766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of QRD-M Detection and Sphere Decoding for MIMO-OFDM Systems
We present a comparative study of two tree search based detection algorithms, namely, the M-algorithm combined with QR decomposition (QRD-M) and the sphere decoding (SD) algorithms, for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. First, we show that nodes ordering before and during the tree search are important for both algorithms. With appropriate ordering, QRD-M can improve detection performance significantly and SD can reduce decoding complexity substantially. Then we compare the implementation complexity of the two algorithms, in terms of the number of nodes required to search or the required number of multiplications to achieve maximum likelihood detection performance. It is interesting to show that the average complexity of SD is lower than that of QRD-M, whereas the worst case complexity of SD is much higher than that of QRD-M