鞘内阿片类脊髓麻醉。一项使用0.0375-0.15 mg吗啡为期1年的研究的临床结果。

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1991-05-01
B Bang-Vojdanovski
{"title":"鞘内阿片类脊髓麻醉。一项使用0.0375-0.15 mg吗啡为期1年的研究的临床结果。","authors":"B Bang-Vojdanovski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prospective study, 184 patients were studied after orthopedic operations with regard to analgesic requirements, analgesic effectiveness, and appearance of postoperative complications. In four groups, 0.0375, 0.075, 0.1 or 0.15 mg morphine was given in combination with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for perioperative analgesia. The patients' ages ranged between 13 and 90 years (means = 62.97). One hundred sixteen patients did not need any analgesics in the first 24 h. The effect of the spinal opiate was found to be pleasant, especially by patients who received a total hip prosthesis: in this group the average duration of analgesia was more than 24 h in 77.9% and 14.5 h in 22.1% of patients. The need for additional postoperative analgesia was seen earliest in the patients who received a knee prosthesis of the sledge type (P less than 0.05). The overall consumption of the analgesic piritramid was clearly reduced and amounted to 7.7 mg on the day of operation, 8.4 mg on the 1st day, 6.0 mg on the 2nd day, and 3.6 mg on the 3rd day after surgery. The degree of postoperative analgesia was the same in all four groups (P greater than 0.05). Blood gas analyses, respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and laboratory parameters were also examined. The application of small doses of opiate close to the spinal cord produced a good and long-lasting reduction of pain with few opiate side effects. In the spinal anesthetics with larger doses of morphine, side effects were rare and hardly different from those accompanying spinal anesthesia without morphine addition. There were no serious complications noted during the opiate anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"14 3","pages":"47-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1991-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intrathecal opiate-spinal anesthesia. Clinical results of a 1-year study using 0.0375-0.15 mg morphine].\",\"authors\":\"B Bang-Vojdanovski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a prospective study, 184 patients were studied after orthopedic operations with regard to analgesic requirements, analgesic effectiveness, and appearance of postoperative complications. In four groups, 0.0375, 0.075, 0.1 or 0.15 mg morphine was given in combination with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for perioperative analgesia. The patients' ages ranged between 13 and 90 years (means = 62.97). One hundred sixteen patients did not need any analgesics in the first 24 h. The effect of the spinal opiate was found to be pleasant, especially by patients who received a total hip prosthesis: in this group the average duration of analgesia was more than 24 h in 77.9% and 14.5 h in 22.1% of patients. The need for additional postoperative analgesia was seen earliest in the patients who received a knee prosthesis of the sledge type (P less than 0.05). The overall consumption of the analgesic piritramid was clearly reduced and amounted to 7.7 mg on the day of operation, 8.4 mg on the 1st day, 6.0 mg on the 2nd day, and 3.6 mg on the 3rd day after surgery. The degree of postoperative analgesia was the same in all four groups (P greater than 0.05). Blood gas analyses, respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and laboratory parameters were also examined. The application of small doses of opiate close to the spinal cord produced a good and long-lasting reduction of pain with few opiate side effects. In the spinal anesthetics with larger doses of morphine, side effects were rare and hardly different from those accompanying spinal anesthesia without morphine addition. There were no serious complications noted during the opiate anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"47-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,对184例骨科手术后患者的镇痛需求、镇痛效果和术后并发症的出现进行了研究。四组患者分别给予0.0375、0.075、0.1、0.15 mg吗啡联合0.5%高压布比卡因围手术期镇痛。患者年龄13 ~ 90岁,平均62.97岁。116例患者在前24小时内不需要任何镇痛药。脊髓阿片类药物的效果令人愉快,特别是接受全髋关节假体的患者:在该组中,77.9%的患者平均镇痛持续时间超过24小时,22.1%的患者平均镇痛持续时间超过14.5小时。在接受雪撬型膝关节假体的患者中,需要术后额外镇痛的时间最早(P < 0.05)。镇痛药吡拉西泮的总用量明显减少,手术当天为7.7 mg,第1天为8.4 mg,第2天为6.0 mg,第3天为3.6 mg。四组患者术后镇痛程度相同(P > 0.05)。血气分析、呼吸频率、血压、心率、血氧饱和度和实验室参数也进行了检查。在脊髓附近应用小剂量阿片类药物可以很好地持久减轻疼痛,而且阿片类药物的副作用很少。在大剂量吗啡的脊髓麻醉中,副作用很少,与未添加吗啡的脊髓麻醉几乎没有区别。麻醉期间未见严重并发症。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Intrathecal opiate-spinal anesthesia. Clinical results of a 1-year study using 0.0375-0.15 mg morphine].

In a prospective study, 184 patients were studied after orthopedic operations with regard to analgesic requirements, analgesic effectiveness, and appearance of postoperative complications. In four groups, 0.0375, 0.075, 0.1 or 0.15 mg morphine was given in combination with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for perioperative analgesia. The patients' ages ranged between 13 and 90 years (means = 62.97). One hundred sixteen patients did not need any analgesics in the first 24 h. The effect of the spinal opiate was found to be pleasant, especially by patients who received a total hip prosthesis: in this group the average duration of analgesia was more than 24 h in 77.9% and 14.5 h in 22.1% of patients. The need for additional postoperative analgesia was seen earliest in the patients who received a knee prosthesis of the sledge type (P less than 0.05). The overall consumption of the analgesic piritramid was clearly reduced and amounted to 7.7 mg on the day of operation, 8.4 mg on the 1st day, 6.0 mg on the 2nd day, and 3.6 mg on the 3rd day after surgery. The degree of postoperative analgesia was the same in all four groups (P greater than 0.05). Blood gas analyses, respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and laboratory parameters were also examined. The application of small doses of opiate close to the spinal cord produced a good and long-lasting reduction of pain with few opiate side effects. In the spinal anesthetics with larger doses of morphine, side effects were rare and hardly different from those accompanying spinal anesthesia without morphine addition. There were no serious complications noted during the opiate anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1