正态分布方差置信区间的贝叶斯方法

Autcha Araveeporn
{"title":"正态分布方差置信区间的贝叶斯方法","authors":"Autcha Araveeporn","doi":"10.1155/2022/8043260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compare estimating the confidence intervals of variance based on the normal distribution with the primary method and the Bayesian approach. The maximum likelihood is the well-known method to approximate variance, and the Chi-squared distribution performs the confidence interval. The central Bayesian approach forms the posterior distribution that makes the variance estimator, which depends on the probability and prior distributions. Most introductory prior information looks for the availability of the prior distribution, informative prior distribution, and noninformative prior distribution. The gamma, Chi-squared, and exponential distributions are defined in the prior distribution. The informative prior distribution uses the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to draw the random sample from the posterior distribution. The Fisher information performs the Wald confidence interval as the noninformative prior distribution. The interval estimation of the Bayesian approach is obtained from the central limit theorem. The performance of these methods considers the coverage probability and minimum value of the average width. The Monte Carlo process simulates the data from a normal distribution with the true parameter of mean and several variances and the sample sizes. The R program generates the simulated data repeated 10,000 times in each situation. The results showed that the maximum likelihood method employed on the small sample sizes. The best confidence interval estimation was when sample sizes increased the Bayesian approach with an available prior distribution. Overall, the Wald confidence interval tended to outperform the large sample sizes. For application in real data, we expressed the reported airborne particulate matter of 2.5 in Bangkok, Thailand. We used the 10–1000 records to estimate the confidence interval of variance and evaluated the interval width. The results are similar to those of the simulation study.","PeriodicalId":301406,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian Approach for Confidence Intervals of Variance on the Normal Distribution\",\"authors\":\"Autcha Araveeporn\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8043260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to compare estimating the confidence intervals of variance based on the normal distribution with the primary method and the Bayesian approach. The maximum likelihood is the well-known method to approximate variance, and the Chi-squared distribution performs the confidence interval. The central Bayesian approach forms the posterior distribution that makes the variance estimator, which depends on the probability and prior distributions. Most introductory prior information looks for the availability of the prior distribution, informative prior distribution, and noninformative prior distribution. The gamma, Chi-squared, and exponential distributions are defined in the prior distribution. The informative prior distribution uses the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to draw the random sample from the posterior distribution. The Fisher information performs the Wald confidence interval as the noninformative prior distribution. The interval estimation of the Bayesian approach is obtained from the central limit theorem. The performance of these methods considers the coverage probability and minimum value of the average width. The Monte Carlo process simulates the data from a normal distribution with the true parameter of mean and several variances and the sample sizes. The R program generates the simulated data repeated 10,000 times in each situation. The results showed that the maximum likelihood method employed on the small sample sizes. The best confidence interval estimation was when sample sizes increased the Bayesian approach with an available prior distribution. Overall, the Wald confidence interval tended to outperform the large sample sizes. For application in real data, we expressed the reported airborne particulate matter of 2.5 in Bangkok, Thailand. We used the 10–1000 records to estimate the confidence interval of variance and evaluated the interval width. The results are similar to those of the simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8043260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8043260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是比较基于正态分布的方差置信区间估计与原始方法和贝叶斯方法。最大似然是众所周知的近似方差的方法,卡方分布执行置信区间。中心贝叶斯方法形成了方差估计的后验分布,方差估计依赖于概率分布和先验分布。大多数介绍性先验信息寻找先验分布、信息性先验分布和非信息性先验分布的可用性。在先验分布中定义了伽玛分布、卡方分布和指数分布。信息先验分布采用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法从后验分布中抽取随机样本。Fisher信息执行Wald置信区间作为非信息先验分布。由中心极限定理得到贝叶斯方法的区间估计。这些方法的性能考虑了覆盖概率和平均宽度的最小值。蒙特卡罗过程模拟来自正态分布的数据,具有真实参数均值和几个方差和样本量。R程序生成在每种情况下重复10000次的模拟数据。结果表明,极大似然法适用于小样本量。最佳置信区间估计是当样本量增加时,贝叶斯方法具有可用的先验分布。总体而言,沃尔德置信区间往往优于大样本量。为了应用于实际数据,我们表示了泰国曼谷报告的空气中颗粒物2.5。我们使用10-1000条记录来估计方差的置信区间,并评估区间宽度。所得结果与模拟研究结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bayesian Approach for Confidence Intervals of Variance on the Normal Distribution
This research aims to compare estimating the confidence intervals of variance based on the normal distribution with the primary method and the Bayesian approach. The maximum likelihood is the well-known method to approximate variance, and the Chi-squared distribution performs the confidence interval. The central Bayesian approach forms the posterior distribution that makes the variance estimator, which depends on the probability and prior distributions. Most introductory prior information looks for the availability of the prior distribution, informative prior distribution, and noninformative prior distribution. The gamma, Chi-squared, and exponential distributions are defined in the prior distribution. The informative prior distribution uses the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to draw the random sample from the posterior distribution. The Fisher information performs the Wald confidence interval as the noninformative prior distribution. The interval estimation of the Bayesian approach is obtained from the central limit theorem. The performance of these methods considers the coverage probability and minimum value of the average width. The Monte Carlo process simulates the data from a normal distribution with the true parameter of mean and several variances and the sample sizes. The R program generates the simulated data repeated 10,000 times in each situation. The results showed that the maximum likelihood method employed on the small sample sizes. The best confidence interval estimation was when sample sizes increased the Bayesian approach with an available prior distribution. Overall, the Wald confidence interval tended to outperform the large sample sizes. For application in real data, we expressed the reported airborne particulate matter of 2.5 in Bangkok, Thailand. We used the 10–1000 records to estimate the confidence interval of variance and evaluated the interval width. The results are similar to those of the simulation study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Investment Returns as Markov Chain Random Walk Prediction of the Stock Prices at Uganda Securities Exchange Using the Exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Model Nth Composite Iterative Scheme via Weak Contractions with Application Tangent Hyperbolic Fluid Flow under Condition of Divergent Channel in the Presence of Porous Medium with Suction/Blowing and Heat Source: Emergence of the Boundary Layer Estimation of Finite Population Mean under Probability-Proportional-to-Size Sampling in the Presence of Extreme Values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1