参数优化实现的Viola-Jones目标检测方法与MTCNN的比较

A. D. Egorov, Almaz F. Idiyatullin, Artur D. Zakirov
{"title":"参数优化实现的Viola-Jones目标检测方法与MTCNN的比较","authors":"A. D. Egorov, Almaz F. Idiyatullin, Artur D. Zakirov","doi":"10.1109/CTS53513.2021.9562926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Face detection on images is a classical computer vision task. Solution to this problem is used in a wide range of apps, mainly in those connected with providing for the elements of administration (access to the data based on a person's face) and elements of control (perimeter safety control systems). The most spread object's face detecting methods may be divided in two groups: classical one (common example is Viola–Jones method) and one based on a neural network (common example is a cascaded convolutional neural network). There are plenty comparisons of face detection methods that, however, do not usually consider the potential for optimization within the parameters of realization methods in question. This paper focuses on the comparison of the parametrically optimized ways of implementation of methods which are typical for each class. Optimization is being carried out in accordance with the algorithm suggested in this paper. It reveals that the optimized Viola–Jones method is inferior to MTCNN by 20–50 % in view of the quality metrics but outruns it 7–14 times when it comes to the processing speed per image. It shows that without using algorithm optimization by parameters, it is barely impossible to get a fair quality and capacity just as the average value of the quality and capacity metrics are visibly lower than the optimal ones.","PeriodicalId":371882,"journal":{"name":"2021 IV International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Parametrically Optimized Implementation of Viola–Jones Object Detection Method and MTCNN\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Egorov, Almaz F. Idiyatullin, Artur D. Zakirov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CTS53513.2021.9562926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Face detection on images is a classical computer vision task. Solution to this problem is used in a wide range of apps, mainly in those connected with providing for the elements of administration (access to the data based on a person's face) and elements of control (perimeter safety control systems). The most spread object's face detecting methods may be divided in two groups: classical one (common example is Viola–Jones method) and one based on a neural network (common example is a cascaded convolutional neural network). There are plenty comparisons of face detection methods that, however, do not usually consider the potential for optimization within the parameters of realization methods in question. This paper focuses on the comparison of the parametrically optimized ways of implementation of methods which are typical for each class. Optimization is being carried out in accordance with the algorithm suggested in this paper. It reveals that the optimized Viola–Jones method is inferior to MTCNN by 20–50 % in view of the quality metrics but outruns it 7–14 times when it comes to the processing speed per image. It shows that without using algorithm optimization by parameters, it is barely impossible to get a fair quality and capacity just as the average value of the quality and capacity metrics are visibly lower than the optimal ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IV International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IV International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS53513.2021.9562926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IV International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS53513.2021.9562926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人脸图像检测是一项经典的计算机视觉任务。这个问题的解决方案被广泛应用于应用程序中,主要是那些与提供管理元素(基于人脸访问数据)和控制元素(周界安全控制系统)相关的应用程序。目前应用最广泛的物体人脸检测方法可以分为两类:一类是经典的(常见的例子是Viola-Jones方法),另一类是基于神经网络的(常见的例子是级联卷积神经网络)。有很多比较的人脸检测方法,然而,通常不考虑潜在的优化范围内的参数实现方法的问题。本文重点比较了各类典型方法的参数化优化实现方式。正在按照本文提出的算法进行优化。结果表明,优化后的Viola-Jones方法在质量指标上比MTCNN差20 - 50%,但在每张图像的处理速度上比MTCNN快7-14倍。结果表明,在不使用参数优化算法的情况下,质量和容量指标的平均值明显低于最优质量和容量指标的平均值,几乎不可能得到公平的质量和容量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Parametrically Optimized Implementation of Viola–Jones Object Detection Method and MTCNN
Face detection on images is a classical computer vision task. Solution to this problem is used in a wide range of apps, mainly in those connected with providing for the elements of administration (access to the data based on a person's face) and elements of control (perimeter safety control systems). The most spread object's face detecting methods may be divided in two groups: classical one (common example is Viola–Jones method) and one based on a neural network (common example is a cascaded convolutional neural network). There are plenty comparisons of face detection methods that, however, do not usually consider the potential for optimization within the parameters of realization methods in question. This paper focuses on the comparison of the parametrically optimized ways of implementation of methods which are typical for each class. Optimization is being carried out in accordance with the algorithm suggested in this paper. It reveals that the optimized Viola–Jones method is inferior to MTCNN by 20–50 % in view of the quality metrics but outruns it 7–14 times when it comes to the processing speed per image. It shows that without using algorithm optimization by parameters, it is barely impossible to get a fair quality and capacity just as the average value of the quality and capacity metrics are visibly lower than the optimal ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of OPC UA Technology in the Study of Models of Control Objects Development of a Radio-Controlled Tentacle Robot Design Concept of Organizational Automated Information Control System based on System Algorithms Information Technology Computer System for Processing Industrial Information for Controlling the Production of Multi-Assortment Polymeric Films Distortion Level Analysis of a 2D Median Filter with a Weighted Central Element
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1