先知先觉

Shaun Nichols
{"title":"先知先觉","authors":"Shaun Nichols","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People seem to expect that rules will be act-based rather than consequence-based. For instance, when people learn a new rule, given minimal evidence, they tend to think that the rule prohibits people from producing a certain consequence, rather than that the rule dictates that such a consequence should be minimized. One explanation is that people have an innate bias to think rules are act-based. This chapter suggests an alternative empiricist proposal. The expectation that rules will be act-based might be explained as a prior that is itself the result of earlier learning. In particular, given that most rules that people have learned are act-based rules, the prior for act-based rules might be acquired through a process of overhypothesis construction.","PeriodicalId":383766,"journal":{"name":"Rational Rules","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priors\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People seem to expect that rules will be act-based rather than consequence-based. For instance, when people learn a new rule, given minimal evidence, they tend to think that the rule prohibits people from producing a certain consequence, rather than that the rule dictates that such a consequence should be minimized. One explanation is that people have an innate bias to think rules are act-based. This chapter suggests an alternative empiricist proposal. The expectation that rules will be act-based might be explained as a prior that is itself the result of earlier learning. In particular, given that most rules that people have learned are act-based rules, the prior for act-based rules might be acquired through a process of overhypothesis construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rational Rules\",\"volume\":\"213 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rational Rules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rational Rules","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869153.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

人们似乎期望规则是基于行为而不是结果的。例如,当人们学习一条新规则时,在证据很少的情况下,他们倾向于认为这条规则禁止人们产生某种后果,而不是认为这条规则规定这种后果应该最小化。一种解释是,人们有一种天生的偏见,认为规则是基于行为的。本章提出了另一种经验主义的建议。规则将基于行为的预期可以解释为先验,它本身就是早期学习的结果。特别是,考虑到人们学习的大多数规则都是基于行为的规则,基于行为的规则的先验可能是通过一个过度假设构建的过程获得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Priors
People seem to expect that rules will be act-based rather than consequence-based. For instance, when people learn a new rule, given minimal evidence, they tend to think that the rule prohibits people from producing a certain consequence, rather than that the rule dictates that such a consequence should be minimized. One explanation is that people have an innate bias to think rules are act-based. This chapter suggests an alternative empiricist proposal. The expectation that rules will be act-based might be explained as a prior that is itself the result of earlier learning. In particular, given that most rules that people have learned are act-based rules, the prior for act-based rules might be acquired through a process of overhypothesis construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rationality and Morality Closure Scope Moral Empiricism Priors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1