礼貌和明确的请求有助于帮助自动送货机器人和有利的社会归因

Annika Boos, Markus Zimmermann, Monika M. Zych, K. Bengler
{"title":"礼貌和明确的请求有助于帮助自动送货机器人和有利的社会归因","authors":"Annika Boos, Markus Zimmermann, Monika M. Zych, K. Bengler","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robots are increasingly involved in tasks that require them to navigate social spaces shared with humans. Following social norms is considered a key requirement for such robots to ensure their acceptance and long-term use. This paper focuses on delivery robots as these often encounter problems in their operational areas–in this case a busy university campus– when they find their way blocked by people and they cannot move on towards their goal destination. We explored automated cue triggering to resolve this situation autonomously without the help of remote operators. Eighty-three pedestrians participated in a real-world study using a delivery robot. Four different cues were tested for their perceived politeness and ambiguity. The four different cues differed in the presence or absence of an instruction and the presence or absence of a justification for the request to let the robot pass as well as source orientation within the justification, which was either internally (self-) directed or externally (user-) directed. The results reveal a complex picture. Overall, a positive effect of verbal instructions in comparison to staying mute on social attributions to the robot was found. Contrary to our expectations, there was no significant difference in politeness between the different requests. Participants’ willingness to let the robot pass was positively correlated with perceived politeness, and negatively correlated with ambiguity of the requests.","PeriodicalId":250997,"journal":{"name":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polite and Unambiguous Requests Facilitate Willingness to Help an Autonomous Delivery Robot and Favourable Social Attributions\",\"authors\":\"Annika Boos, Markus Zimmermann, Monika M. Zych, K. Bengler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robots are increasingly involved in tasks that require them to navigate social spaces shared with humans. Following social norms is considered a key requirement for such robots to ensure their acceptance and long-term use. This paper focuses on delivery robots as these often encounter problems in their operational areas–in this case a busy university campus– when they find their way blocked by people and they cannot move on towards their goal destination. We explored automated cue triggering to resolve this situation autonomously without the help of remote operators. Eighty-three pedestrians participated in a real-world study using a delivery robot. Four different cues were tested for their perceived politeness and ambiguity. The four different cues differed in the presence or absence of an instruction and the presence or absence of a justification for the request to let the robot pass as well as source orientation within the justification, which was either internally (self-) directed or externally (user-) directed. The results reveal a complex picture. Overall, a positive effect of verbal instructions in comparison to staying mute on social attributions to the robot was found. Contrary to our expectations, there was no significant difference in politeness between the different requests. Participants’ willingness to let the robot pass was positively correlated with perceived politeness, and negatively correlated with ambiguity of the requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人越来越多地参与到需要它们在与人类共享的社交空间中导航的任务中。遵守社会规范被认为是确保这类机器人被接受和长期使用的关键要求。这篇论文的重点是送货机器人,因为它们经常在它们的操作区域遇到问题——在这个例子中是一个繁忙的大学校园——当它们发现自己的路被人挡住了,它们无法继续向目的地移动。我们探索了自动提示触发来自主解决这种情况,而无需远程操作人员的帮助。83名行人参与了一项使用送货机器人的现实世界研究。研究人员测试了四种不同线索的礼貌感和模糊性。这四种不同的线索在是否存在指令、是否存在允许机器人通过的理由以及理由内的源方向(内部(自我)指导或外部(用户)指导)方面存在差异。研究结果揭示了一幅复杂的图景。总的来说,与保持沉默相比,口头指示对机器人的社会归因有积极的影响。与我们的预期相反,不同请求之间的礼貌程度没有显著差异。参与者让机器人通过的意愿与感知到的礼貌正相关,与请求的模糊性负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polite and Unambiguous Requests Facilitate Willingness to Help an Autonomous Delivery Robot and Favourable Social Attributions
Robots are increasingly involved in tasks that require them to navigate social spaces shared with humans. Following social norms is considered a key requirement for such robots to ensure their acceptance and long-term use. This paper focuses on delivery robots as these often encounter problems in their operational areas–in this case a busy university campus– when they find their way blocked by people and they cannot move on towards their goal destination. We explored automated cue triggering to resolve this situation autonomously without the help of remote operators. Eighty-three pedestrians participated in a real-world study using a delivery robot. Four different cues were tested for their perceived politeness and ambiguity. The four different cues differed in the presence or absence of an instruction and the presence or absence of a justification for the request to let the robot pass as well as source orientation within the justification, which was either internally (self-) directed or externally (user-) directed. The results reveal a complex picture. Overall, a positive effect of verbal instructions in comparison to staying mute on social attributions to the robot was found. Contrary to our expectations, there was no significant difference in politeness between the different requests. Participants’ willingness to let the robot pass was positively correlated with perceived politeness, and negatively correlated with ambiguity of the requests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I Can’t Believe That Happened! : Exploring Expressivity in Collaborative Storytelling with the Tabletop Robot Haru Nothing About Us Without Us: a participatory design for an Inclusive Signing Tiago Robot Preliminary Investigation of Collision Risk Assessment with Vision for Selecting Targets Paid Attention to by Mobile Robot Step-by-Step Task Plan Explanations Beyond Causal Links Contributions of user tests in a Living Lab in the co-design process of human robot interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1