多分类器集成的多模态脑肿瘤自动分割

M. El-Melegy, Khaled M. Abo El-Magd, Samia A. Ali, K. Hussain, Yousef B. Mahdy
{"title":"多分类器集成的多模态脑肿瘤自动分割","authors":"M. El-Melegy, Khaled M. Abo El-Magd, Samia A. Ali, K. Hussain, Yousef B. Mahdy","doi":"10.1109/ITCE.2019.8646431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ensembles of classifiers can improve the performance of individual classifiers on several classification tasks. In this paper, we investigate the employment of ensemble methods for improving the accuracy of multimodal brain tumor segmentation. Four different ensemble methods are evaluated: Adaboost, bagging, stacking, and voting, on MICCAI BRATS 2016 challenge’s MRI dataset. Our experimental results confirm the performance improvement produced by the ensemble methods over those of 20 different individual classifiers. Majority voting based ensemble method performed the best among the four ensemble methods.","PeriodicalId":391488,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensemble of Multiple Classifiers for Automatic Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation\",\"authors\":\"M. El-Melegy, Khaled M. Abo El-Magd, Samia A. Ali, K. Hussain, Yousef B. Mahdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITCE.2019.8646431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ensembles of classifiers can improve the performance of individual classifiers on several classification tasks. In this paper, we investigate the employment of ensemble methods for improving the accuracy of multimodal brain tumor segmentation. Four different ensemble methods are evaluated: Adaboost, bagging, stacking, and voting, on MICCAI BRATS 2016 challenge’s MRI dataset. Our experimental results confirm the performance improvement produced by the ensemble methods over those of 20 different individual classifiers. Majority voting based ensemble method performed the best among the four ensemble methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCE.2019.8646431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCE.2019.8646431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

分类器的集成可以提高单个分类器在多个分类任务上的性能。在本文中,我们研究了使用集成方法来提高多模态脑肿瘤分割的准确性。在MICCAI BRATS 2016挑战赛的MRI数据集上,评估了四种不同的集成方法:Adaboost、装袋、堆叠和投票。我们的实验结果证实了集成方法比20种不同的单个分类器产生的性能改进。基于多数投票的集成方法在四种集成方法中表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ensemble of Multiple Classifiers for Automatic Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation
Ensembles of classifiers can improve the performance of individual classifiers on several classification tasks. In this paper, we investigate the employment of ensemble methods for improving the accuracy of multimodal brain tumor segmentation. Four different ensemble methods are evaluated: Adaboost, bagging, stacking, and voting, on MICCAI BRATS 2016 challenge’s MRI dataset. Our experimental results confirm the performance improvement produced by the ensemble methods over those of 20 different individual classifiers. Majority voting based ensemble method performed the best among the four ensemble methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
System Design and Implementation of Wall Climbing Robot for Wind Turbine Blade Inspection Application of Fuzzy Logic on Astronomical Images Focus Measure Comparative Evaluation of PWM Techniques Used at Mega 328/p with PI Control for Inverter-Fed Induction Motor Simulating The Thermoelectric Behaviour of CNT Based Harvester Characterization of the sources of degradation in remote sensing satellite images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1