帮助苦苦挣扎的读者追踪自己的学习成长

S. Szabo
{"title":"帮助苦苦挣扎的读者追踪自己的学习成长","authors":"S. Szabo","doi":"10.56887/galiteracy.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a classroom strategy that helps the student become responsible for their own learning. Have you ever been in a classroom where your struggling readers say, “This is stupid” or “I don’t know anything anyway, I’m dumb?” These statements, made by struggling students validate that the affective side of learning is a powerful determiner on how struggling students’ approach learning and show just how discouraged they are with the reading/learning process when they are asked to work at a frustrational level. However, effective teachers have long recognized that attitudes, activating prior knowledge, peer discussion and summarizing are activities that support struggling readers as they learn to read (Alderman, 2003; Bandura, 1997; Bandura, Schunk, 1981; Keene & Zimmerman, 1997/2007; Rosenblatt, 1969, 1978; Wang, 2000). Therefore, the purpose of this article is to share an old strategy, the KWL, which was modified and used in a new way (see Appendix A). This new way provided a means for students to track their own learning growth, which in turn changed their attitudes toward learning. This is an important step, as the common core standards state that students are to work toward meeting expectations so they are prepared to enter college and/or the workforce (Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association, 2010).  ","PeriodicalId":111992,"journal":{"name":"Georgia Journal of Literacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helping Struggling Readers Track Their Own Learning Growth\",\"authors\":\"S. Szabo\",\"doi\":\"10.56887/galiteracy.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a classroom strategy that helps the student become responsible for their own learning. Have you ever been in a classroom where your struggling readers say, “This is stupid” or “I don’t know anything anyway, I’m dumb?” These statements, made by struggling students validate that the affective side of learning is a powerful determiner on how struggling students’ approach learning and show just how discouraged they are with the reading/learning process when they are asked to work at a frustrational level. However, effective teachers have long recognized that attitudes, activating prior knowledge, peer discussion and summarizing are activities that support struggling readers as they learn to read (Alderman, 2003; Bandura, 1997; Bandura, Schunk, 1981; Keene & Zimmerman, 1997/2007; Rosenblatt, 1969, 1978; Wang, 2000). Therefore, the purpose of this article is to share an old strategy, the KWL, which was modified and used in a new way (see Appendix A). This new way provided a means for students to track their own learning growth, which in turn changed their attitudes toward learning. This is an important step, as the common core standards state that students are to work toward meeting expectations so they are prepared to enter college and/or the workforce (Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association, 2010).  \",\"PeriodicalId\":111992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgia Journal of Literacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgia Journal of Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56887/galiteracy.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgia Journal of Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56887/galiteracy.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一种帮助学生对自己的学习负责的课堂策略。你是否曾经在课堂上遇到过这样的情况:那些苦苦挣扎的读者说:“这太蠢了”或者“反正我什么都不懂,我很蠢”?这些由学习困难的学生所做的陈述证实了学习的情感方面是一个强大的决定因素,它决定了学习困难的学生如何学习,并表明当他们被要求在令人沮丧的水平上工作时,他们对阅读/学习过程有多沮丧。然而,有效的教师很早就认识到,态度、激活先验知识、同伴讨论和总结是支持困难读者学习阅读的活动(Alderman, 2003;班杜拉,1997;Bandura, Schunk, 1981;Keene & Zimmerman, 1997/2007;Rosenblatt, 1969,1978;王,2000)。因此,本文的目的是分享一个旧的策略,即KWL,它被修改并以一种新的方式使用(见附录a)。这种新方法为学生提供了一种跟踪自己学习成长的手段,从而改变了他们的学习态度。这是重要的一步,因为共同的核心标准指出,学生们要努力达到期望,这样他们就可以进入大学和/或劳动力市场(首席州学校官员委员会和全国州长协会,2010年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Helping Struggling Readers Track Their Own Learning Growth
This is a classroom strategy that helps the student become responsible for their own learning. Have you ever been in a classroom where your struggling readers say, “This is stupid” or “I don’t know anything anyway, I’m dumb?” These statements, made by struggling students validate that the affective side of learning is a powerful determiner on how struggling students’ approach learning and show just how discouraged they are with the reading/learning process when they are asked to work at a frustrational level. However, effective teachers have long recognized that attitudes, activating prior knowledge, peer discussion and summarizing are activities that support struggling readers as they learn to read (Alderman, 2003; Bandura, 1997; Bandura, Schunk, 1981; Keene & Zimmerman, 1997/2007; Rosenblatt, 1969, 1978; Wang, 2000). Therefore, the purpose of this article is to share an old strategy, the KWL, which was modified and used in a new way (see Appendix A). This new way provided a means for students to track their own learning growth, which in turn changed their attitudes toward learning. This is an important step, as the common core standards state that students are to work toward meeting expectations so they are prepared to enter college and/or the workforce (Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association, 2010).  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tips for Planning a Successful Author Visit Out with the Old, in with the New: Digital Interactive Journals in an Elementary Language Arts Methods Course Reading-Aloud to Children: A Cautionary Tale with Recommendations for Success Building Classroom Community in Elementary Literacy Methods Courses Diverging Ideologies of Disability: A Critique of Literature on Inclusive Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1