工作规范化与滥用监管的关系

Hsiao-Yen Mao, An-Tien Hsieh, Chueh-Wei Mao
{"title":"工作规范化与滥用监管的关系","authors":"Hsiao-Yen Mao,&nbsp;An-Tien Hsieh,&nbsp;Chueh-Wei Mao","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Job standardization is widely used to ensure uniform, efficient, and effective production and resultant organizational performance. However, phenomena suggests that employees with high job standardization seem to have a negative relationship with their supervisors. Using job demands–resources theory as an underlying explanation, this study proposes that job standardization enhances a negative supervisor–subordinate relationship characterized by abusive supervision. Three-wave panel and two-source survey data were collected from 255 employees and their supervisors. Empirical results indicated job standardization enhanced abusive supervision partially through the decreased appraisal respect of subordinates for supervisors and that of supervisors for subordinates. The results indicate a dilemma in employing the job design of standardization: on the one hand, it facilitates managerial effectiveness; on the other hand, it can decrease that effectiveness by deteriorating the supervisor–subordinate relationship. This study extends and shifts the understanding of the consequences of job standardization from the employee perspective to the managerial perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"39 1","pages":"48-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between job standardization and abusive supervision\",\"authors\":\"Hsiao-Yen Mao,&nbsp;An-Tien Hsieh,&nbsp;Chueh-Wei Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjas.1646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Job standardization is widely used to ensure uniform, efficient, and effective production and resultant organizational performance. However, phenomena suggests that employees with high job standardization seem to have a negative relationship with their supervisors. Using job demands–resources theory as an underlying explanation, this study proposes that job standardization enhances a negative supervisor–subordinate relationship characterized by abusive supervision. Three-wave panel and two-source survey data were collected from 255 employees and their supervisors. Empirical results indicated job standardization enhanced abusive supervision partially through the decreased appraisal respect of subordinates for supervisors and that of supervisors for subordinates. The results indicate a dilemma in employing the job design of standardization: on the one hand, it facilitates managerial effectiveness; on the other hand, it can decrease that effectiveness by deteriorating the supervisor–subordinate relationship. This study extends and shifts the understanding of the consequences of job standardization from the employee perspective to the managerial perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"48-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1646\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作标准化被广泛用于确保统一、高效和有效的生产以及由此产生的组织绩效。然而,现象表明,工作标准化程度高的员工与上级的关系似乎是负向的。本研究以工作需求-资源理论为基础解释,提出工作标准化强化了以滥用监管为特征的负向上下级关系。对255名员工及其主管进行了三波面板双源调查。实证结果表明,工作标准化部分通过降低下属对主管的评价尊重和主管对下属的评价尊重来增强滥用监督。结果表明,采用标准化的岗位设计存在一个困境:一方面,它有利于管理的有效性;另一方面,它也会通过恶化上下级关系而降低这种有效性。本研究扩展并转移了对工作标准化后果的理解,从员工的角度到管理的角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between job standardization and abusive supervision

Job standardization is widely used to ensure uniform, efficient, and effective production and resultant organizational performance. However, phenomena suggests that employees with high job standardization seem to have a negative relationship with their supervisors. Using job demands–resources theory as an underlying explanation, this study proposes that job standardization enhances a negative supervisor–subordinate relationship characterized by abusive supervision. Three-wave panel and two-source survey data were collected from 255 employees and their supervisors. Empirical results indicated job standardization enhanced abusive supervision partially through the decreased appraisal respect of subordinates for supervisors and that of supervisors for subordinates. The results indicate a dilemma in employing the job design of standardization: on the one hand, it facilitates managerial effectiveness; on the other hand, it can decrease that effectiveness by deteriorating the supervisor–subordinate relationship. This study extends and shifts the understanding of the consequences of job standardization from the employee perspective to the managerial perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information A person-centered perspective on employees' human resource management values and their implication for organizational commitment The content, evolution and determinants of COVID-19 disclosures in Canadian financial statements and MD&A documents: An impression management perspective La contribution des fournisseurs à la résilience de la chaîne logistique d'équipements de protection individuelle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1