米底帝国,公元前547年乌拉尔图和居鲁士大帝战役的结束

R. Rollinger
{"title":"米底帝国,公元前547年乌拉尔图和居鲁士大帝战役的结束","authors":"R. Rollinger","doi":"10.2143/AWE.7.0.2033252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this paper is, first, the reading of the toponym in Nabonidus Chronicle II 16 of which only the first character is preserved, and, second, an historical reassessment according to which the territory loosely controlled by a Median ‘confederation’ cannot be called an ‘empire’. Contrary to the generally held view the first character cannot be read as ‘LU’ which would require us to restore the text as lu-[ud-di], i.e. Lydia. Collation shows beyond doubt the character represents ‘Ú’ and the only plausible restoration is ú-[ras-†u], i.e. Urartu. Urartu was therefore not destroyed by the Medes at the end of the 7th century BC but continued to exist as an independent political entity until the mid-6th century BC. Thus Nabonidus Chronicle II 16 shows that it was the conquest by Cyrus the Great which brought about the end of Urartu. Introduction In 1988, 1994 and 1995, the late Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg questioned with arguments of considerable weight, the existence of a Median ‘empire’ as a political entity with structures comparable with those of the so called Neo-Assyrian, NeoBabylonian or the Achaemenid ‘empires’.1 She called for a methodologically fresh approach, cast doubt on the general validity of our most important source, i.e. Herodotus’ Medikos Logos, and pointed out gaps in the non-classical sources, primarily for the first half of the 6th century BC. She also considered anthropological models of state formation and conceptual systems used in the social sciences. Independent from each other Burkhart Kienast and I questioned the alleged vassal status of the early Persians vis-à-vis the Medes.2 Amélie Kuhrt recently showed that the Assyrian heartland as well as its eastern fringes (the region around ArrapÌa) * This paper was originally intended to be published as part of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ancient Cultural Relations Between Iran and West Asia. An earlier draft was also placed at www.achemenet.com/ressources/souspresse/annonces/annonces.htm. Since these Proceedings are no longer scheduled to appear, the article was updated, and the totally revised (and definitive) version is now published here. I would like to thank Konrad Kinzl (Peterborough) for reading the manuscript and improving my English and Wilfrid Allinger (Innsbruck) for creating the map (Fig. 1). 1 Sancisi-Weerdenburg 1988; 1994; 1995. Cf. Briant 1996, 36-37. 2 Kienast 1999, 65; Rollinger 1999, 127-34. 1197-08_Anc.West&East_03 12-18-2008, 11:11 51","PeriodicalId":413595,"journal":{"name":"Ancient West & East","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Median 'Empire', the End of Urartu and Cyrus the Great's Campaign in 547 BC\",\"authors\":\"R. Rollinger\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/AWE.7.0.2033252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The focus of this paper is, first, the reading of the toponym in Nabonidus Chronicle II 16 of which only the first character is preserved, and, second, an historical reassessment according to which the territory loosely controlled by a Median ‘confederation’ cannot be called an ‘empire’. Contrary to the generally held view the first character cannot be read as ‘LU’ which would require us to restore the text as lu-[ud-di], i.e. Lydia. Collation shows beyond doubt the character represents ‘Ú’ and the only plausible restoration is ú-[ras-†u], i.e. Urartu. Urartu was therefore not destroyed by the Medes at the end of the 7th century BC but continued to exist as an independent political entity until the mid-6th century BC. Thus Nabonidus Chronicle II 16 shows that it was the conquest by Cyrus the Great which brought about the end of Urartu. Introduction In 1988, 1994 and 1995, the late Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg questioned with arguments of considerable weight, the existence of a Median ‘empire’ as a political entity with structures comparable with those of the so called Neo-Assyrian, NeoBabylonian or the Achaemenid ‘empires’.1 She called for a methodologically fresh approach, cast doubt on the general validity of our most important source, i.e. Herodotus’ Medikos Logos, and pointed out gaps in the non-classical sources, primarily for the first half of the 6th century BC. She also considered anthropological models of state formation and conceptual systems used in the social sciences. Independent from each other Burkhart Kienast and I questioned the alleged vassal status of the early Persians vis-à-vis the Medes.2 Amélie Kuhrt recently showed that the Assyrian heartland as well as its eastern fringes (the region around ArrapÌa) * This paper was originally intended to be published as part of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ancient Cultural Relations Between Iran and West Asia. An earlier draft was also placed at www.achemenet.com/ressources/souspresse/annonces/annonces.htm. Since these Proceedings are no longer scheduled to appear, the article was updated, and the totally revised (and definitive) version is now published here. I would like to thank Konrad Kinzl (Peterborough) for reading the manuscript and improving my English and Wilfrid Allinger (Innsbruck) for creating the map (Fig. 1). 1 Sancisi-Weerdenburg 1988; 1994; 1995. Cf. Briant 1996, 36-37. 2 Kienast 1999, 65; Rollinger 1999, 127-34. 1197-08_Anc.West&East_03 12-18-2008, 11:11 51\",\"PeriodicalId\":413595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ancient West & East\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ancient West & East\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/AWE.7.0.2033252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient West & East","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/AWE.7.0.2033252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文的重点是,首先,阅读《Nabonidus编年史II》16中的地名,其中只有第一个字被保留下来,其次,根据历史重新评估,由米底人“联盟”松散控制的领土不能被称为“帝国”。与普遍持有的观点相反,第一个字符不能被读成“LU”,这将要求我们将文本还原为LU -[ud-di],即Lydia。整理显示,毫无疑问,这个字符代表“Ú”,唯一可信的修复是ú-[ras-†u],即乌拉尔图。因此,乌拉尔图并没有在公元前7世纪末被米底人摧毁,而是作为一个独立的政治实体继续存在,直到公元前6世纪中叶。因此,《那波尼德纪事》II 16表明,是居鲁士大帝的征服导致了乌拉尔图的灭亡。在1988年、1994年和1995年,已故的海伦·桑西西-威登堡提出了相当重要的论点,质疑米底“帝国”作为一个政治实体的存在,其结构可与所谓的新亚述、新巴比伦或阿契美尼德“帝国”相媲美她呼吁采用一种方法论上的新方法,对我们最重要的来源,即希罗多德的《Medikos Logos》的普遍有效性提出质疑,并指出了非经典来源中的空白,主要是在公元前6世纪上半叶。她还考虑了国家形成的人类学模型和社会科学中使用的概念系统。Burkhart Kienast和我彼此独立,质疑早期波斯人对-à-vis米底斯的所谓附属国地位。am lie Kuhrt最近表明,亚述的中心地带及其东部边缘(ArrapÌa周围地区)*这篇论文最初是打算作为第一届伊朗与西亚古代文化关系国际会议记录的一部分发表的。早些时候的一份草案也被放在www.achemenet.com/ressources/souspresse/annonces/annonces.htm上。由于这些会议记录不再计划出现,文章被更新,并且完全修订(和最终)版本现在在这里发布。我要感谢Konrad Kinzl(彼得伯勒)阅读了手稿并提高了我的英语水平,感谢Wilfrid Allinger(因斯布鲁克)绘制了地图(图1)。1994;1995. Cf. Briant 1996, 36-37。2 .吉林大学学报1999,65;罗林格1999,127-34。1197 - 08 - _anc。西部&东部[03]12-18-2008,11:11 51
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Median 'Empire', the End of Urartu and Cyrus the Great's Campaign in 547 BC
The focus of this paper is, first, the reading of the toponym in Nabonidus Chronicle II 16 of which only the first character is preserved, and, second, an historical reassessment according to which the territory loosely controlled by a Median ‘confederation’ cannot be called an ‘empire’. Contrary to the generally held view the first character cannot be read as ‘LU’ which would require us to restore the text as lu-[ud-di], i.e. Lydia. Collation shows beyond doubt the character represents ‘Ú’ and the only plausible restoration is ú-[ras-†u], i.e. Urartu. Urartu was therefore not destroyed by the Medes at the end of the 7th century BC but continued to exist as an independent political entity until the mid-6th century BC. Thus Nabonidus Chronicle II 16 shows that it was the conquest by Cyrus the Great which brought about the end of Urartu. Introduction In 1988, 1994 and 1995, the late Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg questioned with arguments of considerable weight, the existence of a Median ‘empire’ as a political entity with structures comparable with those of the so called Neo-Assyrian, NeoBabylonian or the Achaemenid ‘empires’.1 She called for a methodologically fresh approach, cast doubt on the general validity of our most important source, i.e. Herodotus’ Medikos Logos, and pointed out gaps in the non-classical sources, primarily for the first half of the 6th century BC. She also considered anthropological models of state formation and conceptual systems used in the social sciences. Independent from each other Burkhart Kienast and I questioned the alleged vassal status of the early Persians vis-à-vis the Medes.2 Amélie Kuhrt recently showed that the Assyrian heartland as well as its eastern fringes (the region around ArrapÌa) * This paper was originally intended to be published as part of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ancient Cultural Relations Between Iran and West Asia. An earlier draft was also placed at www.achemenet.com/ressources/souspresse/annonces/annonces.htm. Since these Proceedings are no longer scheduled to appear, the article was updated, and the totally revised (and definitive) version is now published here. I would like to thank Konrad Kinzl (Peterborough) for reading the manuscript and improving my English and Wilfrid Allinger (Innsbruck) for creating the map (Fig. 1). 1 Sancisi-Weerdenburg 1988; 1994; 1995. Cf. Briant 1996, 36-37. 2 Kienast 1999, 65; Rollinger 1999, 127-34. 1197-08_Anc.West&East_03 12-18-2008, 11:11 51
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Greeks in the East Cypriot Taste in Early Greek Ceramic Imports Hecataeus of Miletus and the Greek Encounter with Egypt Rethinking Cultural Contacts Ancient Chronology, Eratosthenes and the Dating of the Fall of Troy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1