量子纠缠,关系的形而上学,气质论和Е。罗氏本体论

N. Golovko
{"title":"量子纠缠,关系的形而上学,气质论和Е。罗氏本体论","authors":"N. Golovko","doi":"10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-8-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to make а fair supplement to the concept of \"metaphysics of relations\" (bу М. Esfeld) with а coгrect coгresponding interpretation of the dispositional natшe of characteristics within Е. J. Lowe's ontology. А reasoning from science to philosophy leads М. Esfeld to the conclusion that \"quantum entanglement understood in terms of non-separability of states speaks for the metaphysics of relations that denies the presence of intrinsic characteristics of the related systems\". The same naturalistic argument provides rationale for the Е. J. Lowe's claim that \"the attribution of а characteristics to а given kind could bе metaphysically contingent\" for \"the laws of nature can bе exactly what they are revealed to us, only because there are no other substantial kinds that could instantiate objects\". As а heuristics for the intentional interpretation ofE. J. Lowe's dispositionalism we deal with the requirements of \"time-relativeness\" and \"relevance to causality\" from W. Malzkorn's list of criteria of satisfactory representation of dispositions.","PeriodicalId":240316,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Journal of Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantum Entanglement, Metaphysics of Relations, Dispositionalism and Е. J. Lowe's Ontology\",\"authors\":\"N. Golovko\",\"doi\":\"10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-8-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper aims to make а fair supplement to the concept of \\\"metaphysics of relations\\\" (bу М. Esfeld) with а coгrect coгresponding interpretation of the dispositional natшe of characteristics within Е. J. Lowe's ontology. А reasoning from science to philosophy leads М. Esfeld to the conclusion that \\\"quantum entanglement understood in terms of non-separability of states speaks for the metaphysics of relations that denies the presence of intrinsic characteristics of the related systems\\\". The same naturalistic argument provides rationale for the Е. J. Lowe's claim that \\\"the attribution of а characteristics to а given kind could bе metaphysically contingent\\\" for \\\"the laws of nature can bе exactly what they are revealed to us, only because there are no other substantial kinds that could instantiate objects\\\". As а heuristics for the intentional interpretation ofE. J. Lowe's dispositionalism we deal with the requirements of \\\"time-relativeness\\\" and \\\"relevance to causality\\\" from W. Malzkorn's list of criteria of satisfactory representation of dispositions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siberian Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siberian Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-8-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-8-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是对“关系的形而上学”的概念(网址:М)作一个公平的补充。Esfeld)用coгrect coгresponding解释Е内部的特征的配置natшe。J. Lowe的本体论。А从科学到哲学的推理引导М。埃斯菲尔德得出的结论是,“从状态不可分性的角度来理解的量子纠缠,说明了关系的形而上学,否认了相关系统内在特征的存在”。同样的自然主义论点为Е提供了基本原理。J. Lowe的主张,“将特征归属于某一特定种类可能是形而上学上偶然的”,因为“自然法则可以完全是它们向我们揭示的东西,只是因为没有其他实体种类可以实例化对象”。作为e的意向性解释的启发式。在J. Lowe的性格论中,我们从W. Malzkorn的性格满意表征标准列表中处理“时间相对性”和“因果相关性”的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantum Entanglement, Metaphysics of Relations, Dispositionalism and Е. J. Lowe's Ontology
The paper aims to make а fair supplement to the concept of "metaphysics of relations" (bу М. Esfeld) with а coгrect coгresponding interpretation of the dispositional natшe of characteristics within Е. J. Lowe's ontology. А reasoning from science to philosophy leads М. Esfeld to the conclusion that "quantum entanglement understood in terms of non-separability of states speaks for the metaphysics of relations that denies the presence of intrinsic characteristics of the related systems". The same naturalistic argument provides rationale for the Е. J. Lowe's claim that "the attribution of а characteristics to а given kind could bе metaphysically contingent" for "the laws of nature can bе exactly what they are revealed to us, only because there are no other substantial kinds that could instantiate objects". As а heuristics for the intentional interpretation ofE. J. Lowe's dispositionalism we deal with the requirements of "time-relativeness" and "relevance to causality" from W. Malzkorn's list of criteria of satisfactory representation of dispositions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Projects and Technologies: Shaping the Worldview of Modern Russian Students Vladimir Lenin, Jared Diamond and Martin Heidegger: On one aspect of understanding of early modern history Anaximander and his «Apeiron» Philosophy of J. Wahl as an independent phenomenon and as an interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy Local self-government in the Russian Federation: the trajectory of conceptual development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1