{"title":"二进制传染通道的最大似然和最小距离解码在什么时候是等价的?","authors":"Ghady Azar, F. Alajaji","doi":"10.1109/CWIT.2013.6621584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study optimal maximum likelihood block decoding of binary codes sent over binary contagion channels with infinite and finite memory. We derive conditions on the codes and channels parameters under which maximum likelihood and minimum Hamming distance are equivalent. We also note that under these conditions, minimum distance decoding can perform better without the use of channel interleaving.","PeriodicalId":398936,"journal":{"name":"2013 13th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When are maximum likelihood and minimum distance decoding equivalent for binary contagion channels?\",\"authors\":\"Ghady Azar, F. Alajaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CWIT.2013.6621584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study optimal maximum likelihood block decoding of binary codes sent over binary contagion channels with infinite and finite memory. We derive conditions on the codes and channels parameters under which maximum likelihood and minimum Hamming distance are equivalent. We also note that under these conditions, minimum distance decoding can perform better without the use of channel interleaving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 13th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 13th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CWIT.2013.6621584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 13th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CWIT.2013.6621584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
When are maximum likelihood and minimum distance decoding equivalent for binary contagion channels?
We study optimal maximum likelihood block decoding of binary codes sent over binary contagion channels with infinite and finite memory. We derive conditions on the codes and channels parameters under which maximum likelihood and minimum Hamming distance are equivalent. We also note that under these conditions, minimum distance decoding can perform better without the use of channel interleaving.