开发和测试算法,用于停止大型系统或程序的测试、筛选和运行

V. Loll
{"title":"开发和测试算法,用于停止大型系统或程序的测试、筛选和运行","authors":"V. Loll","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2000.816295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When large hardware-software systems are run-in or an acceptance testing is made, a problem is when to stop the test and deliver/accept the system. The same problem exists when a large software program is tested with simulated operations data. Based on two theses from the Technical University of Denmark, the paper describes and evaluates 7 possible algorithms. Of these algorithms, the three most promising are tested with simulated data. 27 different systems are simulated, and 50 Monte Carlo simulations made on each system. The stop times generated by the algorithm is compared with the known perfect stop time. Of the three algorithms two is selected as good. These two algorithms are then tested on 10 sets of real data. The algorithms are tested with three different levels of confidence. The number of correct and wrong stop decisions are counted. The conclusion is that the Weibull algorithm with 90% confidence level takes the right decision in every one of the 10 cases.","PeriodicalId":178321,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and testing algorithms for stopping testing, screening, run-in of large systems or programs\",\"authors\":\"V. Loll\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2000.816295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When large hardware-software systems are run-in or an acceptance testing is made, a problem is when to stop the test and deliver/accept the system. The same problem exists when a large software program is tested with simulated operations data. Based on two theses from the Technical University of Denmark, the paper describes and evaluates 7 possible algorithms. Of these algorithms, the three most promising are tested with simulated data. 27 different systems are simulated, and 50 Monte Carlo simulations made on each system. The stop times generated by the algorithm is compared with the known perfect stop time. Of the three algorithms two is selected as good. These two algorithms are then tested on 10 sets of real data. The algorithms are tested with three different levels of confidence. The number of correct and wrong stop decisions are counted. The conclusion is that the Weibull algorithm with 90% confidence level takes the right decision in every one of the 10 cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2000.816295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2000.816295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

当大型软硬件系统运行或进行验收测试时,问题是何时停止测试并交付/验收系统。在用模拟操作数据测试大型软件程序时也存在同样的问题。基于丹麦技术大学的两篇论文,本文描述并评估了7种可能的算法。在这些算法中,三种最有前途的算法用模拟数据进行了测试。模拟了27个不同的系统,并对每个系统进行了50次蒙特卡罗模拟。将算法生成的停止时间与已知的完美停止时间进行比较。在三种算法中,选择了两种算法。然后在10组真实数据上对这两种算法进行了测试。这些算法在三种不同的置信度下进行了测试。计数正确和错误的停止决定的数量。得出的结论是,置信水平为90%的威布尔算法在10种情况下都做出了正确的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing and testing algorithms for stopping testing, screening, run-in of large systems or programs
When large hardware-software systems are run-in or an acceptance testing is made, a problem is when to stop the test and deliver/accept the system. The same problem exists when a large software program is tested with simulated operations data. Based on two theses from the Technical University of Denmark, the paper describes and evaluates 7 possible algorithms. Of these algorithms, the three most promising are tested with simulated data. 27 different systems are simulated, and 50 Monte Carlo simulations made on each system. The stop times generated by the algorithm is compared with the known perfect stop time. Of the three algorithms two is selected as good. These two algorithms are then tested on 10 sets of real data. The algorithms are tested with three different levels of confidence. The number of correct and wrong stop decisions are counted. The conclusion is that the Weibull algorithm with 90% confidence level takes the right decision in every one of the 10 cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to enhance reliability of electronic systems through effective modeling and risk assessment Evaluating the residual risks of infusing new technologies into NASA missions Advisory board - tools for reliability and maintainability practitioners Use of fault tree analysis for evaluation of system-reliability improvements in design phase Power-related failure mechanisms in the analysis of wireless system availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1