多分量心电图心跳检测算法的评估:三种不同噪声伪影的影响

T. Last, C. Nugent, F. Owens, D. Finlay
{"title":"多分量心电图心跳检测算法的评估:三种不同噪声伪影的影响","authors":"T. Last, C. Nugent, F. Owens, D. Finlay","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2007.4745537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motion artifacts, caused by changes in the electrode-skin impedance, electromyographic (EMG) interference, caused by muscle contractions, and possible baseline drifts are three of the most common sources of noise present in ECG recordings. The present study investigates the effects of these noise sources on the performance of ECG beat detection algorithms. Four different beat detection methods were used to evaluate the influence of noise sources with varying signal to noise ratios (SNRs). A database consisting of recordings from approximately 100 subjects consisting of approximately 3000 cardiac cycles was used for evaluation. Hence, 1200 records were subsequently tested by the detectors after adding three different noise sources with four different SNRs of 24 dB, 12 dB, 6 dB and -6 dB to the original 100 records. The four classifiers achieved beat detection results from 98% down to 68% for correctly detected QRS-complexes at SNRs between 24 dB and 6 dB.","PeriodicalId":406683,"journal":{"name":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of multi-component Electrocardiogram beat detection algorithms: Implications of three different noise artifacts\",\"authors\":\"T. Last, C. Nugent, F. Owens, D. Finlay\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIC.2007.4745537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motion artifacts, caused by changes in the electrode-skin impedance, electromyographic (EMG) interference, caused by muscle contractions, and possible baseline drifts are three of the most common sources of noise present in ECG recordings. The present study investigates the effects of these noise sources on the performance of ECG beat detection algorithms. Four different beat detection methods were used to evaluate the influence of noise sources with varying signal to noise ratios (SNRs). A database consisting of recordings from approximately 100 subjects consisting of approximately 3000 cardiac cycles was used for evaluation. Hence, 1200 records were subsequently tested by the detectors after adding three different noise sources with four different SNRs of 24 dB, 12 dB, 6 dB and -6 dB to the original 100 records. The four classifiers achieved beat detection results from 98% down to 68% for correctly detected QRS-complexes at SNRs between 24 dB and 6 dB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 Computers in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 Computers in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由电极-皮肤阻抗变化引起的运动伪影、由肌肉收缩引起的肌电图(EMG)干扰以及可能的基线漂移是心电图记录中最常见的三个噪声源。本研究探讨了这些噪声源对心电心跳检测算法性能的影响。采用四种不同的拍频检测方法,对不同信噪比的噪声源对图像的影响进行了评价。评估使用了一个由大约100名受试者的记录组成的数据库,其中包括大约3000个心脏周期。因此,在原始100条记录的基础上,添加了24 dB、12 dB、6 dB和-6 dB四种不同信噪比的三种不同噪声源,随后对1200条记录进行了检测。对于在24 dB到6 dB的信噪比范围内正确检测到的qrs复合物,这四种分类器实现了从98%到68%的节拍检测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of multi-component Electrocardiogram beat detection algorithms: Implications of three different noise artifacts
Motion artifacts, caused by changes in the electrode-skin impedance, electromyographic (EMG) interference, caused by muscle contractions, and possible baseline drifts are three of the most common sources of noise present in ECG recordings. The present study investigates the effects of these noise sources on the performance of ECG beat detection algorithms. Four different beat detection methods were used to evaluate the influence of noise sources with varying signal to noise ratios (SNRs). A database consisting of recordings from approximately 100 subjects consisting of approximately 3000 cardiac cycles was used for evaluation. Hence, 1200 records were subsequently tested by the detectors after adding three different noise sources with four different SNRs of 24 dB, 12 dB, 6 dB and -6 dB to the original 100 records. The four classifiers achieved beat detection results from 98% down to 68% for correctly detected QRS-complexes at SNRs between 24 dB and 6 dB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and use of a patient data management system in the intensive care unit: A two-year experience Modelling effects of sotalol on T-wave morphology Vulnerability to reentry in a 3D regionally ischemic ventricular slab preparation: A simulation study Evaluation of multi-component Electrocardiogram beat detection algorithms: Implications of three different noise artifacts Dynamic 4D blood flow representation in the aorta and analysis from cine-MRI in patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1