教育中“技术领导”研究的趋势:范围审查

Özgen Korkmaz, Asena Özge Kutlu, Şifanur Yavuz
{"title":"教育中“技术领导”研究的趋势:范围审查","authors":"Özgen Korkmaz, Asena Özge Kutlu, Şifanur Yavuz","doi":"10.51535/tell.1088511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of technology and the effective use of technology in education systems have revealed the concept of technology leadership. In this study, a total of 32 master's and doctoral dissertations on 'technology leadership' published in the National Thesis Center of Turkey (YÖKTEZ) between 2009-2020 were examined. PRISMA (2009) model was preferred in the selection of published thesis studies. This review was carried out using the Scopping Review method of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). In this direction, the scope of the research consisted of 28 master's and 1 doctoral thesis ‘in the field of education and training’, ‘the language of publication is Turkish’, which ‘has the conditions of publication and permission’. Of the examined studies, 26 were conducted using quantitative, 2 qualitative and 1 mixed research method. In the sample distributions in the studies, it is seen that there are 52% teacher participants and 24% administrator participants. When the findings of the studies were examined, it was determined that school administrators' self-efficacy regarding technology leadership, role perceptions and teacher views on technology leadership were the most researched dependent variables. In studies on ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) and NETS-A (National Educational Technology Standards for Administrators) standards, it has been concluded that school administrators are seen as technology leaders. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the studies on technology leadership in education have increased in recent years, but doctoral studies are not sufficient in the general distribution.","PeriodicalId":127236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","volume":"1985 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in 'Technology Leadership' Research in Education: Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Özgen Korkmaz, Asena Özge Kutlu, Şifanur Yavuz\",\"doi\":\"10.51535/tell.1088511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid development of technology and the effective use of technology in education systems have revealed the concept of technology leadership. In this study, a total of 32 master's and doctoral dissertations on 'technology leadership' published in the National Thesis Center of Turkey (YÖKTEZ) between 2009-2020 were examined. PRISMA (2009) model was preferred in the selection of published thesis studies. This review was carried out using the Scopping Review method of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). In this direction, the scope of the research consisted of 28 master's and 1 doctoral thesis ‘in the field of education and training’, ‘the language of publication is Turkish’, which ‘has the conditions of publication and permission’. Of the examined studies, 26 were conducted using quantitative, 2 qualitative and 1 mixed research method. In the sample distributions in the studies, it is seen that there are 52% teacher participants and 24% administrator participants. When the findings of the studies were examined, it was determined that school administrators' self-efficacy regarding technology leadership, role perceptions and teacher views on technology leadership were the most researched dependent variables. In studies on ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) and NETS-A (National Educational Technology Standards for Administrators) standards, it has been concluded that school administrators are seen as technology leaders. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the studies on technology leadership in education have increased in recent years, but doctoral studies are not sufficient in the general distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning\",\"volume\":\"1985 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1088511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1088511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

技术的快速发展和技术在教育系统中的有效应用揭示了技术领导的概念。在本研究中,共检查了2009-2020年期间在土耳其国家论文中心(YÖKTEZ)发表的32篇关于“技术领导力”的硕士和博士论文。在已发表论文研究的选择中,首选PRISMA(2009)模型。本综述采用Arksey和O'Malley(2005)的scoping review方法进行。在这个方向上,研究范围包括“教育和培训领域”的28篇硕士论文和1篇博士论文,“出版语言为土耳其语”,“具有出版和许可条件”。在被检查的研究中,26项采用定量研究方法,2项采用定性研究方法,1项采用混合研究方法。在研究的样本分布中,教师参与者占52%,管理人员参与者占24%。当对研究结果进行检验时,确定学校管理者对技术领导的自我效能感、角色认知和教师对技术领导的看法是研究最多的因变量。在对ISTE(国际教育技术学会)和NETS-A(国家管理人员教育技术标准)标准的研究中,得出的结论是,学校管理人员被视为技术领导者。通过对文献的梳理,可以发现近年来关于教育中的技术领导的研究有所增加,但总体分布上博士研究并不充足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in 'Technology Leadership' Research in Education: Scoping Review
The rapid development of technology and the effective use of technology in education systems have revealed the concept of technology leadership. In this study, a total of 32 master's and doctoral dissertations on 'technology leadership' published in the National Thesis Center of Turkey (YÖKTEZ) between 2009-2020 were examined. PRISMA (2009) model was preferred in the selection of published thesis studies. This review was carried out using the Scopping Review method of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). In this direction, the scope of the research consisted of 28 master's and 1 doctoral thesis ‘in the field of education and training’, ‘the language of publication is Turkish’, which ‘has the conditions of publication and permission’. Of the examined studies, 26 were conducted using quantitative, 2 qualitative and 1 mixed research method. In the sample distributions in the studies, it is seen that there are 52% teacher participants and 24% administrator participants. When the findings of the studies were examined, it was determined that school administrators' self-efficacy regarding technology leadership, role perceptions and teacher views on technology leadership were the most researched dependent variables. In studies on ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) and NETS-A (National Educational Technology Standards for Administrators) standards, it has been concluded that school administrators are seen as technology leaders. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the studies on technology leadership in education have increased in recent years, but doctoral studies are not sufficient in the general distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Emergency Distance Education Based Lifelong Learning Environment Use from Student Perspective: A Phenomenological Research The Effect of The Modified Solve It! Strategy on The Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Students with Learning Difficulties Determination of Secondary School Students' Misconceptions About the Concept of Seed with the Four-Tier Misconception Diagnostic Test Assessment of an In-Service Training Activity Transformed into an E-Learning Environment Using the Kirkpatrick Model The Mediating Role of Positive Rumination and Negative Rumination in the Relationship between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Interpersonal Problem Solving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1