影响大学生跨学科研究计划的因素分析

Sheri Leder, Kristin Weger, Bryan L. Mesmer
{"title":"影响大学生跨学科研究计划的因素分析","authors":"Sheri Leder, Kristin Weger, Bryan L. Mesmer","doi":"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enhancing undergraduate programs with interdisciplinary collaboration is increasingly important to prepare students for the demands of the competitive multi-stakeholder market. In this study, the Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Experience (INCLUDE) program brings undergraduates from disciplines such as industrial and systems engineering, computer science, psychology, ethics, art, and marketing together and grants them the opportunity to network with practitioner mentors from large stakeholder organizations (e.g., NASA, Dynetics, AOA, the U.S. Army, and Navy) to solve a Grand Challenge. Although interdisciplinary teams are key to innovation, monodisciplinary programs tend to be divergent in nature and may not expose students to project teamwork. Problems arise when trying to foster effective outcomes for students who are unfamiliar with the skills necessary for self-managed teamwork. The purpose of this study is to share the results of exploratory qualitative research designed to better understand the challenges that senior undergraduates from two separate teams (Fall 2020 - Spring 2021 and Fall 2021 - Spring 2022) faced in the INCLUDE program at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). This analysis focuses on the individual, institutional, and gender factors that shaped student perceptions between the two focus groups who were tasked with different Grand Challenges and access to the same campus resources. Data sets from observations and interviews are used in this study. This approach, combined with extensive literature research, provides valuable insight into their perceptions and attitudes about interdisciplinary teamwork and possible conflict resolutions. The results are expected to reveal the complexity of interdisciplinary collaboration for educational researchers.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis on the Factors Affecting Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Research Programs\",\"authors\":\"Sheri Leder, Kristin Weger, Bryan L. Mesmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Enhancing undergraduate programs with interdisciplinary collaboration is increasingly important to prepare students for the demands of the competitive multi-stakeholder market. In this study, the Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Experience (INCLUDE) program brings undergraduates from disciplines such as industrial and systems engineering, computer science, psychology, ethics, art, and marketing together and grants them the opportunity to network with practitioner mentors from large stakeholder organizations (e.g., NASA, Dynetics, AOA, the U.S. Army, and Navy) to solve a Grand Challenge. Although interdisciplinary teams are key to innovation, monodisciplinary programs tend to be divergent in nature and may not expose students to project teamwork. Problems arise when trying to foster effective outcomes for students who are unfamiliar with the skills necessary for self-managed teamwork. The purpose of this study is to share the results of exploratory qualitative research designed to better understand the challenges that senior undergraduates from two separate teams (Fall 2020 - Spring 2021 and Fall 2021 - Spring 2022) faced in the INCLUDE program at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). This analysis focuses on the individual, institutional, and gender factors that shaped student perceptions between the two focus groups who were tasked with different Grand Challenges and access to the same campus resources. Data sets from observations and interviews are used in this study. This approach, combined with extensive literature research, provides valuable insight into their perceptions and attitudes about interdisciplinary teamwork and possible conflict resolutions. The results are expected to reveal the complexity of interdisciplinary collaboration for educational researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加强跨学科合作的本科课程,为学生准备好应对竞争激烈的多方利益相关者市场的需求变得越来越重要。在这项研究中,跨学科本科生体验(INCLUDE)项目将来自工业和系统工程、计算机科学、心理学、伦理学、艺术和市场营销等学科的本科生聚集在一起,并为他们提供与来自大型利益相关者组织(如NASA、dynamics、AOA、美国陆军和海军)的实践者导师建立联系的机会,以解决一个重大挑战。虽然跨学科的团队是创新的关键,但单学科的项目往往在本质上是发散的,可能不会让学生接触到项目团队合作。当学生不熟悉自我管理团队的必要技能时,试图培养有效的结果就会出现问题。本研究的目的是分享探索性定性研究的结果,旨在更好地理解来自两个独立团队(2020年秋季- 2021年春季和2021年秋季- 2022年春季)的高年级本科生在亨茨维尔阿拉巴马大学(UAH)的INCLUDE项目中面临的挑战。这一分析侧重于个人、机构和性别因素,这些因素影响了学生对两个焦点群体的看法,这两个焦点群体面临着不同的大挑战,并获得相同的校园资源。本研究使用了来自观察和访谈的数据集。这种方法与广泛的文献研究相结合,为他们对跨学科团队合作和可能的冲突解决方案的看法和态度提供了有价值的见解。研究结果有望为教育研究者揭示跨学科合作的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis on the Factors Affecting Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Research Programs
Enhancing undergraduate programs with interdisciplinary collaboration is increasingly important to prepare students for the demands of the competitive multi-stakeholder market. In this study, the Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Experience (INCLUDE) program brings undergraduates from disciplines such as industrial and systems engineering, computer science, psychology, ethics, art, and marketing together and grants them the opportunity to network with practitioner mentors from large stakeholder organizations (e.g., NASA, Dynetics, AOA, the U.S. Army, and Navy) to solve a Grand Challenge. Although interdisciplinary teams are key to innovation, monodisciplinary programs tend to be divergent in nature and may not expose students to project teamwork. Problems arise when trying to foster effective outcomes for students who are unfamiliar with the skills necessary for self-managed teamwork. The purpose of this study is to share the results of exploratory qualitative research designed to better understand the challenges that senior undergraduates from two separate teams (Fall 2020 - Spring 2021 and Fall 2021 - Spring 2022) faced in the INCLUDE program at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). This analysis focuses on the individual, institutional, and gender factors that shaped student perceptions between the two focus groups who were tasked with different Grand Challenges and access to the same campus resources. Data sets from observations and interviews are used in this study. This approach, combined with extensive literature research, provides valuable insight into their perceptions and attitudes about interdisciplinary teamwork and possible conflict resolutions. The results are expected to reveal the complexity of interdisciplinary collaboration for educational researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering Convergence Across Behavioral and Self-report Measures Evaluating Individuals' Trust in an Autonomous Golf Cart Investigating the Illicit Trade of Cultural Property with an Automated Data Pipeline Architecture Investigating Disinformation Through the Lens of Mass Media: A System Design Dynamic Coal Production Line: Plant Design and Analysis Tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1