J. Ellershaw, J. Riding, A. Tran, L. Guan, T. Smith
{"title":"澳大利亚农村和偏远地区宽带接入的经济分析","authors":"J. Ellershaw, J. Riding, A. Tran, L. Guan, T. Smith","doi":"10.1109/ATNAC.2008.4783285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We model and compare the deployment costs of three broadband access technologies, namely digital subscriber loops (DSL), passive optical networks (PON), and WiMAX wireless access, in Australian rural and remote areas. The analysis shows that wireless technologies are cheapest for a 20 Mbit/s rate when the number of homes per square kilometer is less than one. For 50+ Mbit/s, passive optical networks are the most economic.","PeriodicalId":143803,"journal":{"name":"2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Analysis of Broadband Access for Australian Rural and Remote Areas\",\"authors\":\"J. Ellershaw, J. Riding, A. Tran, L. Guan, T. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATNAC.2008.4783285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We model and compare the deployment costs of three broadband access technologies, namely digital subscriber loops (DSL), passive optical networks (PON), and WiMAX wireless access, in Australian rural and remote areas. The analysis shows that wireless technologies are cheapest for a 20 Mbit/s rate when the number of homes per square kilometer is less than one. For 50+ Mbit/s, passive optical networks are the most economic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATNAC.2008.4783285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATNAC.2008.4783285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic Analysis of Broadband Access for Australian Rural and Remote Areas
We model and compare the deployment costs of three broadband access technologies, namely digital subscriber loops (DSL), passive optical networks (PON), and WiMAX wireless access, in Australian rural and remote areas. The analysis shows that wireless technologies are cheapest for a 20 Mbit/s rate when the number of homes per square kilometer is less than one. For 50+ Mbit/s, passive optical networks are the most economic.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
