法国和德国欧洲规范7对岩土设计极限状态的验证

R. Frank, B. Schuppener, N. Vogt, A. Weissenbach
{"title":"法国和德国欧洲规范7对岩土设计极限状态的验证","authors":"R. Frank, B. Schuppener, N. Vogt, A. Weissenbach","doi":"10.1080/17747120.2007.9692948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper describes the three design approaches (DA 1, DA 2 and DA 3) offered by Eurocode 7 on “Geotechnical design” for verifying ultimate limit states in persistent or transient design situations (i.e. under fundamental combinations). They are applied and compared in the case of a strip footing under eccentric and inclined loading. Both in France and in Germany, DA 2 has been selected for most geotechnical structures, though with some differences between the two countries for a limited number of cases. The principles and the choices made for the selection of the design approach, as well as of the values for the partial factors of safety, are explained for the two countries.","PeriodicalId":368904,"journal":{"name":"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of ultimate limit states in geotechnical design by Eurocode 7 in France and Germany\",\"authors\":\"R. Frank, B. Schuppener, N. Vogt, A. Weissenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17747120.2007.9692948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper describes the three design approaches (DA 1, DA 2 and DA 3) offered by Eurocode 7 on “Geotechnical design” for verifying ultimate limit states in persistent or transient design situations (i.e. under fundamental combinations). They are applied and compared in the case of a strip footing under eccentric and inclined loading. Both in France and in Germany, DA 2 has been selected for most geotechnical structures, though with some differences between the two countries for a limited number of cases. The principles and the choices made for the selection of the design approach, as well as of the values for the partial factors of safety, are explained for the two countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17747120.2007.9692948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17747120.2007.9692948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文描述了欧洲规范7在“岩土设计”中提供的三种设计方法(da1, da2和da3),用于验证持久或瞬态设计情况下的极限状态(即在基本组合下)。对偏心和倾斜荷载作用下的条形基础进行了应用和比较。在法国和德国,大多数土工结构都选择了da2,尽管两国在有限数量的情况下存在一些差异。阐述了两国在选择设计方法时的原则和选择,以及部分安全系数的取值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Verification of ultimate limit states in geotechnical design by Eurocode 7 in France and Germany
ABSTRACT This paper describes the three design approaches (DA 1, DA 2 and DA 3) offered by Eurocode 7 on “Geotechnical design” for verifying ultimate limit states in persistent or transient design situations (i.e. under fundamental combinations). They are applied and compared in the case of a strip footing under eccentric and inclined loading. Both in France and in Germany, DA 2 has been selected for most geotechnical structures, though with some differences between the two countries for a limited number of cases. The principles and the choices made for the selection of the design approach, as well as of the values for the partial factors of safety, are explained for the two countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index des titres Volume 11/2007 A new experimental device for assessing the radial strains of concrete at high temperatures Réponses mécaniques d'une suspension de bentonite activée Modélisation par éléments discrets d'ouvrages 3D en génie civil Index des auteurs Volume 11/2007
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1