体育解说作为受版权保护作品的特点

D. Doroshenko
{"title":"体育解说作为受版权保护作品的特点","authors":"D. Doroshenko","doi":"10.33731/32022.262620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keywords: sports commentary, sport broadcast, broadcast, speech, creative activity \nThe article analyses a sports commentary legal nature as a result of creative activityof sportscaster, and, correspondingly, the possibility of legal protection provisionfor such a commentary.Based on the analysis of multiple researches, devoted to sports commentary, and establishedpractice, the author determines that sports commentary can be seen as creativework that demands a significant level of knowledge from a sportscaster whose aimis to attract an audience to sports broadcast. Thereby, a high number of sports commentariesfeatured by unique author’s style and originality contains the signs of artistic workthat could be protected by copyright according to Berne Convention provisions. In general, such result of creative activity corresponds to speech as copyright protected work,since sports commentary combines an applying of material prepared and analysed in advanceand impromptu generating due to unpredictability of sports competition actions.At the same time, the author emphasizes the difference of legal approaches to settlementof disputes concerning sports commentary within legal frameworks in the USA, theEU, and Ukraine. In particular, the Supreme Court of Sweden denies to acknowledge thelevel of sports commentary originality enough for copyright protection. However, such aposition can hardly be considered as common regarding sports commentary, since it doesnot characterize the work of a sports commentator as in general due to the variety of approachescan be applied in this genre of sports journalism. Simultaneously, judiciary ofUkraine and US indirectly recognize a sportscaster work as a creative activity. Thus,even though sports commentary is not protected by copyright within existing legalframeworks, several judgements provides the way to solution of that discuss. Bearing inmind that for today a broadcast of sports events still has pretty inappropriate level oflegal protection to secure it from pirate activities, the protection of sports commentarycould prove another legal instrument aimed to strengthen sports broadcasting legal positionsand personal rights of sportscaster.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The features of sports commentary as copyright protected work\",\"authors\":\"D. Doroshenko\",\"doi\":\"10.33731/32022.262620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keywords: sports commentary, sport broadcast, broadcast, speech, creative activity \\nThe article analyses a sports commentary legal nature as a result of creative activityof sportscaster, and, correspondingly, the possibility of legal protection provisionfor such a commentary.Based on the analysis of multiple researches, devoted to sports commentary, and establishedpractice, the author determines that sports commentary can be seen as creativework that demands a significant level of knowledge from a sportscaster whose aimis to attract an audience to sports broadcast. Thereby, a high number of sports commentariesfeatured by unique author’s style and originality contains the signs of artistic workthat could be protected by copyright according to Berne Convention provisions. In general, such result of creative activity corresponds to speech as copyright protected work,since sports commentary combines an applying of material prepared and analysed in advanceand impromptu generating due to unpredictability of sports competition actions.At the same time, the author emphasizes the difference of legal approaches to settlementof disputes concerning sports commentary within legal frameworks in the USA, theEU, and Ukraine. In particular, the Supreme Court of Sweden denies to acknowledge thelevel of sports commentary originality enough for copyright protection. However, such aposition can hardly be considered as common regarding sports commentary, since it doesnot characterize the work of a sports commentator as in general due to the variety of approachescan be applied in this genre of sports journalism. Simultaneously, judiciary ofUkraine and US indirectly recognize a sportscaster work as a creative activity. Thus,even though sports commentary is not protected by copyright within existing legalframeworks, several judgements provides the way to solution of that discuss. Bearing inmind that for today a broadcast of sports events still has pretty inappropriate level oflegal protection to secure it from pirate activities, the protection of sports commentarycould prove another legal instrument aimed to strengthen sports broadcasting legal positionsand personal rights of sportscaster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33731/32022.262620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/32022.262620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键词:体育解说,体育转播,转播,演讲,创造性活动本文分析了体育解说由于体育解说的创造性活动而具有的法律性质,并相应地分析了对体育解说进行法律保护的可能性。基于对多项研究的分析,致力于体育解说和既定的实践,作者确定体育解说可以被视为一种创造性的工作,需要体育播音员的重要知识水平,其目的是吸引观众观看体育转播。因此,根据《伯尔尼公约》的规定,大量具有独特作者风格和独创性的体育解说具有受版权保护的艺术作品的特征。一般来说,这种创造性活动的结果对应于作为受版权保护的作品的言论,因为体育评论结合了对事先准备和分析的材料的应用,以及由于体育比赛动作的不可预测性而即兴产生的。同时,作者强调了在美国、欧盟和乌克兰的法律框架内解决体育解说纠纷的法律途径的差异。特别是,瑞典最高法院否认承认体育解说的独创性足以获得版权保护。然而,这种立场很难被认为是体育评论的普遍观点,因为它并没有像一般情况下那样描述体育评论员的工作,因为这种类型的体育新闻可以采用多种方法。同时,乌克兰和美国的司法机关也间接承认体育转播工作是一种创造性活动。因此,尽管在现有的法律框架内,体育评论不受版权保护,但一些判决为解决这一讨论提供了途径。记住,今天的体育赛事广播仍然有相当不适当的法律保护水平,以确保它免受盗版活动,保护体育评论可以证明另一个旨在加强体育广播法律地位和体育播音员个人权利的法律工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The features of sports commentary as copyright protected work
Keywords: sports commentary, sport broadcast, broadcast, speech, creative activity The article analyses a sports commentary legal nature as a result of creative activityof sportscaster, and, correspondingly, the possibility of legal protection provisionfor such a commentary.Based on the analysis of multiple researches, devoted to sports commentary, and establishedpractice, the author determines that sports commentary can be seen as creativework that demands a significant level of knowledge from a sportscaster whose aimis to attract an audience to sports broadcast. Thereby, a high number of sports commentariesfeatured by unique author’s style and originality contains the signs of artistic workthat could be protected by copyright according to Berne Convention provisions. In general, such result of creative activity corresponds to speech as copyright protected work,since sports commentary combines an applying of material prepared and analysed in advanceand impromptu generating due to unpredictability of sports competition actions.At the same time, the author emphasizes the difference of legal approaches to settlementof disputes concerning sports commentary within legal frameworks in the USA, theEU, and Ukraine. In particular, the Supreme Court of Sweden denies to acknowledge thelevel of sports commentary originality enough for copyright protection. However, such aposition can hardly be considered as common regarding sports commentary, since it doesnot characterize the work of a sports commentator as in general due to the variety of approachescan be applied in this genre of sports journalism. Simultaneously, judiciary ofUkraine and US indirectly recognize a sportscaster work as a creative activity. Thus,even though sports commentary is not protected by copyright within existing legalframeworks, several judgements provides the way to solution of that discuss. Bearing inmind that for today a broadcast of sports events still has pretty inappropriate level oflegal protection to secure it from pirate activities, the protection of sports commentarycould prove another legal instrument aimed to strengthen sports broadcasting legal positionsand personal rights of sportscaster.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accelerated examination of patent applications for «green» technologies: foreign experience for Ukraine Draft Regulation of the European Union about artificial intelligence and related initiatives Intellectual property rights in the context of biology, medicine and pharmacy: a look into the future The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation ABUSE OF PATENTABILITY CRITERIA WHEN PATENTING INVENTIONS RELATED TO MEDICINES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1