以消费为导向的扩张将导致未来产出增长放缓

M. Virén
{"title":"以消费为导向的扩张将导致未来产出增长放缓","authors":"M. Virén","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.2352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When assessing future growth prospects, does the current structure of demand matter, i.e. does it affect the future growth? This question is analysed in our paper by using global and EU panel data. The result is quite striking: consumption-led growth either in terms of private or public or total consumption is slower than investment-led or exports-led growth. The same qualitative result is obtained irrespectively of the length of the past growth period (lag window), yet the more often the past is characterised by consumption-led growth, the slower the growth rate is in the future. In this context, our research provides important insights from the point of view of both structural and cyclical policies.","PeriodicalId":357447,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Statystyczny","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumption-led expansions lead to lower future output growth\",\"authors\":\"M. Virén\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.2352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When assessing future growth prospects, does the current structure of demand matter, i.e. does it affect the future growth? This question is analysed in our paper by using global and EU panel data. The result is quite striking: consumption-led growth either in terms of private or public or total consumption is slower than investment-led or exports-led growth. The same qualitative result is obtained irrespectively of the length of the past growth period (lag window), yet the more often the past is characterised by consumption-led growth, the slower the growth rate is in the future. In this context, our research provides important insights from the point of view of both structural and cyclical policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegląd Statystyczny\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegląd Statystyczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Statystyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在评估未来的增长前景时,当前的需求结构是否重要,即是否会影响未来的增长?本文利用全球和欧盟面板数据对这一问题进行了分析。其结果相当惊人:无论是从私人还是公共或总消费的角度来看,消费拉动型增长都慢于投资拉动型或出口拉动型增长。无论过去的增长期(滞后窗口)有多长,都可以得到相同的定性结果,但过去越是以消费主导的增长为特征,未来的增长率就越慢。在此背景下,我们的研究从结构性和周期性政策的角度提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumption-led expansions lead to lower future output growth
When assessing future growth prospects, does the current structure of demand matter, i.e. does it affect the future growth? This question is analysed in our paper by using global and EU panel data. The result is quite striking: consumption-led growth either in terms of private or public or total consumption is slower than investment-led or exports-led growth. The same qualitative result is obtained irrespectively of the length of the past growth period (lag window), yet the more often the past is characterised by consumption-led growth, the slower the growth rate is in the future. In this context, our research provides important insights from the point of view of both structural and cyclical policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of a priori positive information on the results of voting methods Comparison of the accuracy of forecasts bsed on neural networks before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic on the example of selected exchange rates Estimation of Yu and Meyer bivariate stochastic volatility model by iterated filtering Sample size in clinical trials – challenges and approaches Alternative investments during turbulent times comparison of dynamic relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1