疼痛的经典条件反射:一个定制的单案例实验设计的发展

Tu De, V. J. Madden
{"title":"疼痛的经典条件反射:一个定制的单案例实验设计的发展","authors":"Tu De, V. J. Madden","doi":"10.36850/e8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-case experiments are increasingly popular in the behavioral sciences. Due to their flexibility, single-\ncase designs can be customized to test a variety of experimental hypotheses. We were interested in\nusing a single-case experimental approach to test whether pain thresholds can be influenced by Pavlovian\nclassical conditioning. Following the example of earlier studies into this topic, we planned to measure\nwhether participants would more frequently report specific electrocutaneous stimuli as painful when\nthey were presented with specific vibrotactile stimuli that had previously been associated with painful\nelectrocutaneous stimuli. First, we decided on a mean difference effect size measure derived from the\nSensation and Pain Rating Scale ratings for the electrocutaneous stimuli provided by the participants. Next,\nwe discussed several possible single-case designs and evaluated their benefits and shortcomings. Then,\nwe ran pilot tests with a few participants based on the possible single-case designs. We also conducted\na simulation study to estimate the power of a randomization test to test our hypothesis using different\nvalues for effect size, number of participants, and number of measurements. Finally, we decided on a\nsequentially replicated AB phase design with 30 participants based on the results from the pilot tests\nand the power study. We plan to implement this single-case design in a future experiment to test our\nhypothesis","PeriodicalId":275817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trial and Error","volume":"13 19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical Conditioning for Pain: The Development of a Customized Single-Case Experimental Design\",\"authors\":\"Tu De, V. J. Madden\",\"doi\":\"10.36850/e8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single-case experiments are increasingly popular in the behavioral sciences. Due to their flexibility, single-\\ncase designs can be customized to test a variety of experimental hypotheses. We were interested in\\nusing a single-case experimental approach to test whether pain thresholds can be influenced by Pavlovian\\nclassical conditioning. Following the example of earlier studies into this topic, we planned to measure\\nwhether participants would more frequently report specific electrocutaneous stimuli as painful when\\nthey were presented with specific vibrotactile stimuli that had previously been associated with painful\\nelectrocutaneous stimuli. First, we decided on a mean difference effect size measure derived from the\\nSensation and Pain Rating Scale ratings for the electrocutaneous stimuli provided by the participants. Next,\\nwe discussed several possible single-case designs and evaluated their benefits and shortcomings. Then,\\nwe ran pilot tests with a few participants based on the possible single-case designs. We also conducted\\na simulation study to estimate the power of a randomization test to test our hypothesis using different\\nvalues for effect size, number of participants, and number of measurements. Finally, we decided on a\\nsequentially replicated AB phase design with 30 participants based on the results from the pilot tests\\nand the power study. We plan to implement this single-case design in a future experiment to test our\\nhypothesis\",\"PeriodicalId\":275817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trial and Error\",\"volume\":\"13 19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trial and Error\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36850/e8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trial and Error","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36850/e8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

单例实验在行为科学中越来越受欢迎。由于它们的灵活性,单例设计可以定制以测试各种实验假设。我们感兴趣的是使用单例实验方法来测试疼痛阈值是否会受到巴甫洛夫经典条件反射的影响。根据该主题早期研究的例子,我们计划测量当参与者被呈现特定的振动触觉刺激时,他们是否会更频繁地报告特定的皮肤电刺激是疼痛的,而这些刺激之前与疼痛的皮肤电刺激有关。首先,我们根据参与者提供的皮肤电刺激的感觉和疼痛评定量表评分,确定了平均差异效应大小测量。接下来,我们讨论了几种可能的单案例设计,并评估了它们的优点和缺点。然后,我们根据可能的单一案例设计对一些参与者进行了试点测试。我们还进行了模拟研究,以估计随机化测试的能力,以使用不同的效应大小、参与者数量和测量数量来检验我们的假设。最后,根据中试测试和功率研究的结果,我们决定30名参与者依次重复AB阶段设计。我们计划在未来的实验中实施这种单案例设计来验证我们的假设
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classical Conditioning for Pain: The Development of a Customized Single-Case Experimental Design
Single-case experiments are increasingly popular in the behavioral sciences. Due to their flexibility, single- case designs can be customized to test a variety of experimental hypotheses. We were interested in using a single-case experimental approach to test whether pain thresholds can be influenced by Pavlovian classical conditioning. Following the example of earlier studies into this topic, we planned to measure whether participants would more frequently report specific electrocutaneous stimuli as painful when they were presented with specific vibrotactile stimuli that had previously been associated with painful electrocutaneous stimuli. First, we decided on a mean difference effect size measure derived from the Sensation and Pain Rating Scale ratings for the electrocutaneous stimuli provided by the participants. Next, we discussed several possible single-case designs and evaluated their benefits and shortcomings. Then, we ran pilot tests with a few participants based on the possible single-case designs. We also conducted a simulation study to estimate the power of a randomization test to test our hypothesis using different values for effect size, number of participants, and number of measurements. Finally, we decided on a sequentially replicated AB phase design with 30 participants based on the results from the pilot tests and the power study. We plan to implement this single-case design in a future experiment to test our hypothesis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serendipity in Scientific Research Three Persistent Myths about Open Science The Music Must Play On: The Music Therapy Sessions that Should not Have Stopped Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents A Manifesto for Rewarding and Recognizing Team Infrastructure Roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1