当事情出错时谁来买单?斯堪的纳维亚和欧洲的网络金融欺诈和消费者保护

Marte Eidsand Kjørven
{"title":"当事情出错时谁来买单?斯堪的纳维亚和欧洲的网络金融欺诈和消费者保护","authors":"Marte Eidsand Kjørven","doi":"10.54648/eulr2020004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online financial fraud targeted at consumers through phishing attacks and identity theft, for example, is a growing problem. Because it can be difficult to recover losses from the person who committed the fraud, the loss will often remain with either the financial institution or the consumer. This paper’s research question relates to how losses following online financial fraud are and should be allocated between these two parties according to relevant Scandinavian and European law. For payment-transaction fraud, questions of loss allocation are regulated by national rules implementing the liability regime for unauthorised payment transactions under the payment services directive. For other financial services, these questions are resolved according to general rules on contract and tort. The analysis shows that consumers are often left to deal with the losses caused by online financial fraud. It is argued that the digitalisation of the financial services industry has in practice led to a shift in who bears the risk for attacks against financial institutions. This conflicts with the EU’s stated policy goals to provide strong consumer protection in the field of cybercrime. The paper concludes that a larger portion of the losses incurred from online financial fraud should be allocated to financial institutions.\nfinancial services, digitalisation, fraud, consumer protection, payment services, liability, unauthorised payment transactions, electronic signatures, cyber security","PeriodicalId":255992,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Financial Fraud eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Pays When Things Go Wrong? Online Financial Fraud and Consumer Protection in Scandinavia and Europe\",\"authors\":\"Marte Eidsand Kjørven\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2020004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online financial fraud targeted at consumers through phishing attacks and identity theft, for example, is a growing problem. Because it can be difficult to recover losses from the person who committed the fraud, the loss will often remain with either the financial institution or the consumer. This paper’s research question relates to how losses following online financial fraud are and should be allocated between these two parties according to relevant Scandinavian and European law. For payment-transaction fraud, questions of loss allocation are regulated by national rules implementing the liability regime for unauthorised payment transactions under the payment services directive. For other financial services, these questions are resolved according to general rules on contract and tort. The analysis shows that consumers are often left to deal with the losses caused by online financial fraud. It is argued that the digitalisation of the financial services industry has in practice led to a shift in who bears the risk for attacks against financial institutions. This conflicts with the EU’s stated policy goals to provide strong consumer protection in the field of cybercrime. The paper concludes that a larger portion of the losses incurred from online financial fraud should be allocated to financial institutions.\\nfinancial services, digitalisation, fraud, consumer protection, payment services, liability, unauthorised payment transactions, electronic signatures, cyber security\",\"PeriodicalId\":255992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumer Financial Fraud eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumer Financial Fraud eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2020004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Financial Fraud eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2020004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

例如,通过网络钓鱼攻击和身份盗窃针对消费者的在线金融欺诈是一个日益严重的问题。由于很难从诈骗者那里追回损失,因此损失通常由金融机构或消费者承担。本文的研究问题是,根据斯堪的纳维亚和欧洲的相关法律,网络金融欺诈造成的损失应该如何在这两方之间分配。对于支付交易欺诈,损失分配问题由国家规则管理,根据支付服务指令实施未经授权的支付交易责任制度。对于其他金融服务,这些问题根据合同和侵权的一般规则来解决。分析显示,消费者往往要自己处理网络金融欺诈造成的损失。有人认为,金融服务业的数字化在实践中导致了谁来承担针对金融机构的攻击风险的转变。这与欧盟在网络犯罪领域提供强有力的消费者保护的政策目标相冲突。本文的结论是,网络金融诈骗造成的损失更大一部分应该分配给金融机构。金融服务、数字化、欺诈、消费者保护、支付服务、责任、未经授权的支付交易、电子签名、网络安全
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Pays When Things Go Wrong? Online Financial Fraud and Consumer Protection in Scandinavia and Europe
Online financial fraud targeted at consumers through phishing attacks and identity theft, for example, is a growing problem. Because it can be difficult to recover losses from the person who committed the fraud, the loss will often remain with either the financial institution or the consumer. This paper’s research question relates to how losses following online financial fraud are and should be allocated between these two parties according to relevant Scandinavian and European law. For payment-transaction fraud, questions of loss allocation are regulated by national rules implementing the liability regime for unauthorised payment transactions under the payment services directive. For other financial services, these questions are resolved according to general rules on contract and tort. The analysis shows that consumers are often left to deal with the losses caused by online financial fraud. It is argued that the digitalisation of the financial services industry has in practice led to a shift in who bears the risk for attacks against financial institutions. This conflicts with the EU’s stated policy goals to provide strong consumer protection in the field of cybercrime. The paper concludes that a larger portion of the losses incurred from online financial fraud should be allocated to financial institutions. financial services, digitalisation, fraud, consumer protection, payment services, liability, unauthorised payment transactions, electronic signatures, cyber security
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insider Trading Profitability in Turkey Delving into Ponzi Schemes - Evolution Impact and Enforcement Scammed and Scarred: Effects of Investment Fraud on its Victims Turn-of-the-Month Effect, FX Influence, and Efficient Market Hypothesis: New Perspectives from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Correlates of Compliance: Examining Consumer Fraud Risk Factors by Scam Type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1