在家工作中教授和教育人员表现评估(Wfh):泗水州立大学案例研究

S Suprapto, Suparji Suparji, S. Harianto, A. E. Palupi, Suwarno Imam Samsul
{"title":"在家工作中教授和教育人员表现评估(Wfh):泗水州立大学案例研究","authors":"S Suprapto, Suparji Suparji, S. Harianto, A. E. Palupi, Suwarno Imam Samsul","doi":"10.26740/JPSI.V5N2.P90-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study aimed to describe the performance of lecturers and administration staff at Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa) during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This study was conducted in Unesa during the Covid-19 pandemic, from March to October 2020. This study was designed as a population study, namely research using all populations as samples that included all Unesa lecturers and administration staffs. The data were collected using open and closed questionnaires with the respondents from lecturers, Head of Subdivisions, and students. The obtained data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis with narrative explanation. The data portrayed the following conclusions: (1) In coping with the Unesa administration staffs’ performance based on the Head’s evaluation, the Head of Subdivision gave excellent appreciation with a mean score of 3.31; (2) In accordance with the Unesa administration staff’s performance based on student assessment, the students gave a very good score with a mean score of 3.21; (3) Student assessment of lecturer’s performance for each faculty and postgraduate program, the highest planning score was postgraduate with an average score of 3.62 and the lowest score was the Faculty of Sports Science with an average score of 3.27, the highest implementation score was postgraduate with a mean score of 3.61 and the lowest was The Faculty of Sports Science with an average score of 3.2, the highest evaluation score was postgraduate with a score of 3.60 and the lowest was the Faculty of Sports Science with a score of 3.26; (4) based on the self-assessment of lecturer performance, the three biggest problems and constraints were 35.15% of signal problems; 20.78% of problems with costs and limited internet quota; and 12.84% of literacy problems. Three suggestions for improvements for online lectures were 33.87% of requirment to improve Vinesa: 32.80% of assistance with facilities and 8.28% of training/preparation/online lecture manuals. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kinerja dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa) selama masa Pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Unesa selama pandemi Covid-19 yaitu bulan Maret sampai dengan bulan Oktober 2020. Penelitian ini didesain sebagai penelitian populasi yaitu penelitian dengan menggunakan semua populasi sebagai sampel yaitu semua dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Unesa. Data diambil menggunakan teknik pengambilan data berupa angket terbuka dan tertutup dengan responden dosen, Kepala Sub Bagian dan mahasiswa. Data akan dianalisis dengan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif dengan penjelasan secara narasi. Data hasil penelitian memperoleh simpulan sebagai berikut: (1) Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa Berdasarkan Penilaian Atasan, Kasubbag memberikan apresiasi yang sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,31; (2) Rerata Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa berdasarkan Penilaian Mahasiswa memberikan penilaian sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,21; (3) Penilaian Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Perkuliahan Dosen Setiap Fakultas dan Pascasarjana, tahap perencanaan skor tertinggi adalah Pascasarjana dengan skor rerata 3,62 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor rerata 3,27, tahap pelaksanaan tertinggi Pascasarjana dengan skor rerata 3,61 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor rerata 3,2, tahap evaluasi tertinggi Pascasarjana dengan skor 3,60 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor 3,26; (4) Berdasarkan Self Assesment Kinerja Dosen, tiga permasalahan dan kendala terbesar adalah 35,15% masalah signal; 20,78% masalah biaya dan keterbatasan kuota internet; dan 12,84% masalah literasi. Tiga saran perbaikan untuk perkuliahan on line adalah 33,87% perlu dilakukannya penyempurnaan Vinesa; 32,80% bantuan fasilitas dan 8,28% adanya pelatihan/persiapan/buku pedoman kuliah daring.","PeriodicalId":345914,"journal":{"name":"JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dan Tenaga Kependidikan Selama Work From Home (Wfh): Studi Kasus Di Universitas Negeri Surabaya\",\"authors\":\"S Suprapto, Suparji Suparji, S. Harianto, A. E. Palupi, Suwarno Imam Samsul\",\"doi\":\"10.26740/JPSI.V5N2.P90-99\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study aimed to describe the performance of lecturers and administration staff at Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa) during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This study was conducted in Unesa during the Covid-19 pandemic, from March to October 2020. This study was designed as a population study, namely research using all populations as samples that included all Unesa lecturers and administration staffs. The data were collected using open and closed questionnaires with the respondents from lecturers, Head of Subdivisions, and students. The obtained data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis with narrative explanation. The data portrayed the following conclusions: (1) In coping with the Unesa administration staffs’ performance based on the Head’s evaluation, the Head of Subdivision gave excellent appreciation with a mean score of 3.31; (2) In accordance with the Unesa administration staff’s performance based on student assessment, the students gave a very good score with a mean score of 3.21; (3) Student assessment of lecturer’s performance for each faculty and postgraduate program, the highest planning score was postgraduate with an average score of 3.62 and the lowest score was the Faculty of Sports Science with an average score of 3.27, the highest implementation score was postgraduate with a mean score of 3.61 and the lowest was The Faculty of Sports Science with an average score of 3.2, the highest evaluation score was postgraduate with a score of 3.60 and the lowest was the Faculty of Sports Science with a score of 3.26; (4) based on the self-assessment of lecturer performance, the three biggest problems and constraints were 35.15% of signal problems; 20.78% of problems with costs and limited internet quota; and 12.84% of literacy problems. Three suggestions for improvements for online lectures were 33.87% of requirment to improve Vinesa: 32.80% of assistance with facilities and 8.28% of training/preparation/online lecture manuals. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kinerja dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa) selama masa Pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Unesa selama pandemi Covid-19 yaitu bulan Maret sampai dengan bulan Oktober 2020. Penelitian ini didesain sebagai penelitian populasi yaitu penelitian dengan menggunakan semua populasi sebagai sampel yaitu semua dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Unesa. Data diambil menggunakan teknik pengambilan data berupa angket terbuka dan tertutup dengan responden dosen, Kepala Sub Bagian dan mahasiswa. Data akan dianalisis dengan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif dengan penjelasan secara narasi. Data hasil penelitian memperoleh simpulan sebagai berikut: (1) Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa Berdasarkan Penilaian Atasan, Kasubbag memberikan apresiasi yang sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,31; (2) Rerata Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa berdasarkan Penilaian Mahasiswa memberikan penilaian sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,21; (3) Penilaian Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Perkuliahan Dosen Setiap Fakultas dan Pascasarjana, tahap perencanaan skor tertinggi adalah Pascasarjana dengan skor rerata 3,62 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor rerata 3,27, tahap pelaksanaan tertinggi Pascasarjana dengan skor rerata 3,61 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor rerata 3,2, tahap evaluasi tertinggi Pascasarjana dengan skor 3,60 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor 3,26; (4) Berdasarkan Self Assesment Kinerja Dosen, tiga permasalahan dan kendala terbesar adalah 35,15% masalah signal; 20,78% masalah biaya dan keterbatasan kuota internet; dan 12,84% masalah literasi. Tiga saran perbaikan untuk perkuliahan on line adalah 33,87% perlu dilakukannya penyempurnaan Vinesa; 32,80% bantuan fasilitas dan 8,28% adanya pelatihan/persiapan/buku pedoman kuliah daring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26740/JPSI.V5N2.P90-99\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/JPSI.V5N2.P90-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究旨在描述泗水大学(Unesa)讲师和行政人员在Covid-19大流行期间的表现。这项研究是在2020年3月至10月Covid-19大流行期间在联合国经社厅进行的。本研究被设计为一项人口研究,即使用所有人口作为样本的研究,其中包括联合国环境署所有讲师和行政人员。数据是通过开放式和封闭式问卷收集的,受访者来自讲师、分部负责人和学生。所获得的数据采用定量描述性分析和叙事解释进行分析。这些数据显示了以下结论:(1)在处理联合国经社厅行政工作人员根据主管评价的工作成绩时,分科主管给予了极好的评价,平均得分为3.31分;(2)根据Unesa行政人员根据学生评估的表现,学生的成绩非常好,平均成绩为3.21分;(3)学生对各院系和研究生专业讲师表现的评价,规划得分最高的是研究生,平均得分为3.62分,最低的是体育科学学院,平均得分为3.27分;执行得分最高的是研究生,平均得分为3.61分,最低的是体育科学学院,平均得分为3.2分;评价分数最高的是研究生,为3.60分;最低的是体育科学学院,为3.26分;(4)基于讲师绩效自我评价,三个最大的问题和约束占信号问题的35.15%;20.78%的问题是成本和上网配额有限;12.84%的人有读写问题。对在线讲座提出的三个改进建议占改进Vinesa要求的33.87%:设备协助的32.80%和培训/准备/在线讲座手册的8.28%。[摘要]江苏泗水大学(Unesa)预防新冠肺炎疫情。2020年10月,新冠肺炎新冠肺炎疫情暴发。Penelitian ini didesain sebagai Penelitian populasi yitu Penelitian dengan menggunakan semua populasi sebagai样本yitu semua dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Unesa。数据diambil menggunakan teknik pengambilan数据berupa angket terbuka dantututuka denengan响应数据,Kepala subbagian dan mahasiswa。数据可以分析,数据可以分析,数据可以分析,数据可以分析,数据可以分析。(1) Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa Berdasarkan Penilaian Atasan, Kasubbag memberikan apresasi yang sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,31;(2) Rerata Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa berdasarkan Penilaian Mahasiswa memberikan Penilaian sangat baik dengan skor Rerata 3,21;(3) Penilaian Mahasiswa terhaha - Kinerja Perkuliahan Dosen seapakultas和Pascasarjana,即perhasiswa和skkteringi,即perhasiswa和skkteringi,即perhasiswa和skkteringi,即olaharjana和skkteringi,即olaharjana和skkteringi, 3,27,即perhasiswa和teringi,即paskasarjana和skkteringi,即olaharjana和skkteringi,即3,2,即perhasiswa和teringi,即评估teringi,即Pascasarjana和skkteringi,即3,2,即评估teringi,即Pascasarjana和skkteringi,即3,26;(4) Berdasarkan自我评价Kinerja Dosen, tiga permasalahan和kendala terbesar adalah 35,15% masalah信号;20,78% masalah biaya Dan keterbatasan kuota互联网;但12,84% masalah literasi。Tiga saran perbaikan untuk perkuliahan在线adalah 33,87% perlu dilakukannya penyempurnaan Vinesa;32,8,28% adanya pelatihan/ persian /buku pedoman kuliah daring。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dan Tenaga Kependidikan Selama Work From Home (Wfh): Studi Kasus Di Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ABSTRACTThis study aimed to describe the performance of lecturers and administration staff at Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa) during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This study was conducted in Unesa during the Covid-19 pandemic, from March to October 2020. This study was designed as a population study, namely research using all populations as samples that included all Unesa lecturers and administration staffs. The data were collected using open and closed questionnaires with the respondents from lecturers, Head of Subdivisions, and students. The obtained data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis with narrative explanation. The data portrayed the following conclusions: (1) In coping with the Unesa administration staffs’ performance based on the Head’s evaluation, the Head of Subdivision gave excellent appreciation with a mean score of 3.31; (2) In accordance with the Unesa administration staff’s performance based on student assessment, the students gave a very good score with a mean score of 3.21; (3) Student assessment of lecturer’s performance for each faculty and postgraduate program, the highest planning score was postgraduate with an average score of 3.62 and the lowest score was the Faculty of Sports Science with an average score of 3.27, the highest implementation score was postgraduate with a mean score of 3.61 and the lowest was The Faculty of Sports Science with an average score of 3.2, the highest evaluation score was postgraduate with a score of 3.60 and the lowest was the Faculty of Sports Science with a score of 3.26; (4) based on the self-assessment of lecturer performance, the three biggest problems and constraints were 35.15% of signal problems; 20.78% of problems with costs and limited internet quota; and 12.84% of literacy problems. Three suggestions for improvements for online lectures were 33.87% of requirment to improve Vinesa: 32.80% of assistance with facilities and 8.28% of training/preparation/online lecture manuals. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kinerja dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa) selama masa Pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Unesa selama pandemi Covid-19 yaitu bulan Maret sampai dengan bulan Oktober 2020. Penelitian ini didesain sebagai penelitian populasi yaitu penelitian dengan menggunakan semua populasi sebagai sampel yaitu semua dosen dan tenaga kependidikan Unesa. Data diambil menggunakan teknik pengambilan data berupa angket terbuka dan tertutup dengan responden dosen, Kepala Sub Bagian dan mahasiswa. Data akan dianalisis dengan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif dengan penjelasan secara narasi. Data hasil penelitian memperoleh simpulan sebagai berikut: (1) Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa Berdasarkan Penilaian Atasan, Kasubbag memberikan apresiasi yang sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,31; (2) Rerata Kinerja Tendik seluruh Unesa berdasarkan Penilaian Mahasiswa memberikan penilaian sangat baik dengan skor rerata 3,21; (3) Penilaian Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Perkuliahan Dosen Setiap Fakultas dan Pascasarjana, tahap perencanaan skor tertinggi adalah Pascasarjana dengan skor rerata 3,62 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor rerata 3,27, tahap pelaksanaan tertinggi Pascasarjana dengan skor rerata 3,61 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor rerata 3,2, tahap evaluasi tertinggi Pascasarjana dengan skor 3,60 dan terendah Fakultas Ilmu Olahraga dengan skor 3,26; (4) Berdasarkan Self Assesment Kinerja Dosen, tiga permasalahan dan kendala terbesar adalah 35,15% masalah signal; 20,78% masalah biaya dan keterbatasan kuota internet; dan 12,84% masalah literasi. Tiga saran perbaikan untuk perkuliahan on line adalah 33,87% perlu dilakukannya penyempurnaan Vinesa; 32,80% bantuan fasilitas dan 8,28% adanya pelatihan/persiapan/buku pedoman kuliah daring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Nagari Panti Timur Kecamatan Panti Kabupaten Pasaman Strategic Management of The Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, State University of Surabaya, in Improving The Quality of Education during The Covid-19 Pandemic Refining The Dengue Vulnerability Assessment Based on Dengue Vulnerability Framework Malaysia (DVFM) Evaluasi Kinerja Jabatan Fungsional Tenaga Kependidikan di Universitas Negeri Surabaya Pengembangan Ekonomi Daerah melalui Sektor Unggulan Kota Surabaya dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1