在住房和养老金制度慷慨之间是否存在权衡?来自卢森堡财富研究的实证证据

Edyta Marcinkiewicz, F. Chybalski
{"title":"在住房和养老金制度慷慨之间是否存在权衡?来自卢森堡财富研究的实证证据","authors":"Edyta Marcinkiewicz, F. Chybalski","doi":"10.1111/spol.12865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to the discussion about the housing-pensions nexus. However, it aims to explore housing in the context of welfare provision from a different perspective. Unlike the vast majority of the previous studies, we do not focus on homeownership per se or housing deprivation as a dimension of poverty, but on the significance of housing wealth. Additionally, the presented analysis is based on the more comprehensive concept of pension generosity assessment which includes empirical replacement rates. The study employs micro-data from the Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) dataset. Using statistical analysis and multinomial logistic regression modelling we examine housing wealth patterns among elderly households with a special focus on the possible linkage between housing and pension system’s generosity. The results of cross-country comparisons imply that there are large country differences in terms of housing wealth accumulation. Analyses of the relationship between (average) pension system generosity and the (average) share of housing assets in total assets at the country level using aggregated values do not provide any evidence for the pensions-housing trade-off. However, when the level of aggregation is reduced, a different picture emerges. Especially when the households having very small or no housing assets relative to total assets are excluded, it becomes clearer that individuals receiving higher pension tend to differentiate their asset portfolio.","PeriodicalId":271904,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a trade‐off between housing and pension system generosity? Empirical evidence from the Luxembourg Wealth Study\",\"authors\":\"Edyta Marcinkiewicz, F. Chybalski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spol.12865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study contributes to the discussion about the housing-pensions nexus. However, it aims to explore housing in the context of welfare provision from a different perspective. Unlike the vast majority of the previous studies, we do not focus on homeownership per se or housing deprivation as a dimension of poverty, but on the significance of housing wealth. Additionally, the presented analysis is based on the more comprehensive concept of pension generosity assessment which includes empirical replacement rates. The study employs micro-data from the Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) dataset. Using statistical analysis and multinomial logistic regression modelling we examine housing wealth patterns among elderly households with a special focus on the possible linkage between housing and pension system’s generosity. The results of cross-country comparisons imply that there are large country differences in terms of housing wealth accumulation. Analyses of the relationship between (average) pension system generosity and the (average) share of housing assets in total assets at the country level using aggregated values do not provide any evidence for the pensions-housing trade-off. However, when the level of aggregation is reduced, a different picture emerges. Especially when the households having very small or no housing assets relative to total assets are excluded, it becomes clearer that individuals receiving higher pension tend to differentiate their asset portfolio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Policy & Administration\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Policy & Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究有助于探讨住房与养老金的关系。然而,它旨在从不同的角度探讨福利提供背景下的住房。与之前的绝大多数研究不同,我们并不关注房屋所有权本身或住房剥夺作为贫困的一个维度,而是关注住房财富的重要性。此外,所提出的分析是根据更全面的养恤金慷慨评估概念,其中包括经验替代率。该研究采用了卢森堡财富研究(LWS)数据集的微观数据。利用统计分析和多项逻辑回归模型,我们研究了老年家庭的住房财富模式,特别关注住房与养老金制度慷慨之间可能存在的联系。跨国比较的结果表明,在住房财富积累方面存在较大的国家差异。对国家一级(平均)养恤金制度慷慨程度与住房资产在总资产中所占(平均)份额之间的关系进行的综合价值分析没有提供养恤金-住房权衡的任何证据。然而,当聚合水平降低时,就会出现不同的画面。特别是如果排除在总资产中住宅资产非常少或没有住宅资产的家庭,就会更清楚地看到,领取较高养老金的个人倾向于区分资产组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is there a trade‐off between housing and pension system generosity? Empirical evidence from the Luxembourg Wealth Study
This study contributes to the discussion about the housing-pensions nexus. However, it aims to explore housing in the context of welfare provision from a different perspective. Unlike the vast majority of the previous studies, we do not focus on homeownership per se or housing deprivation as a dimension of poverty, but on the significance of housing wealth. Additionally, the presented analysis is based on the more comprehensive concept of pension generosity assessment which includes empirical replacement rates. The study employs micro-data from the Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) dataset. Using statistical analysis and multinomial logistic regression modelling we examine housing wealth patterns among elderly households with a special focus on the possible linkage between housing and pension system’s generosity. The results of cross-country comparisons imply that there are large country differences in terms of housing wealth accumulation. Analyses of the relationship between (average) pension system generosity and the (average) share of housing assets in total assets at the country level using aggregated values do not provide any evidence for the pensions-housing trade-off. However, when the level of aggregation is reduced, a different picture emerges. Especially when the households having very small or no housing assets relative to total assets are excluded, it becomes clearer that individuals receiving higher pension tend to differentiate their asset portfolio.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A path to professional capability: The Career Start Programme in Bulgaria as a strategy to youth development How do OECD countries differ in population ageing and the situation of people aged 65 and older? Evidence using cluster analysis Developing a novel inclusive policy analysis framework based on capability approach and institutional analysis and development method A decade of outsourcing in health and social care in England: What was it meant to achieve? Education for all? Literature, culture and education development in Britain and Denmark. By Cathie JoMartin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2024. pp. 286. £85 (hardback). ISBN: 9781009419659
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1