信息不对称下的公共投资决策分析

Yun-Sug Baik, S. H. Seog
{"title":"信息不对称下的公共投资决策分析","authors":"Yun-Sug Baik, S. H. Seog","doi":"10.1080/12265934.1998.9693419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines inefficient budget allocation between “certainly” public projects whose values are known to the public and “uncertainty” public projects whose values are not known to the public, where monitoring systems of government are less developed. Using a simple agency model in a political economy setting, we theoretically explain how information asymmetry and political agency costs induce inefficiency in public investments. A government agent with political concerns about the next election may primarily choose certainty public projects even if the certainty public projects are less socially beneficial than uncertainty public projects. The results of our model suggest that the increase/decrease in budget size without appropriately reducing information asymmetry problem cannot be a fully useful policy to control the inefficient budget allocation between two types of public projects.","PeriodicalId":131083,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Urban Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Public Investment Decision-Making under Information Asymmetry\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Sug Baik, S. H. Seog\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12265934.1998.9693419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines inefficient budget allocation between “certainly” public projects whose values are known to the public and “uncertainty” public projects whose values are not known to the public, where monitoring systems of government are less developed. Using a simple agency model in a political economy setting, we theoretically explain how information asymmetry and political agency costs induce inefficiency in public investments. A government agent with political concerns about the next election may primarily choose certainty public projects even if the certainty public projects are less socially beneficial than uncertainty public projects. The results of our model suggest that the increase/decrease in budget size without appropriately reducing information asymmetry problem cannot be a fully useful policy to control the inefficient budget allocation between two types of public projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Urban Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Urban Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.1998.9693419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Urban Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.1998.9693419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了价值为公众所知的“确定性”公共项目与价值不为公众所知的“不确定性”公共项目之间的低效率预算分配,其中政府监督系统较不发达。本文运用一个简单的政治经济学代理模型,从理论上解释了信息不对称和政治代理成本如何导致公共投资效率低下。对下届选举有政治关切的政府代理人可能主要选择确定性公共项目,即使确定性公共项目的社会效益不如不确定性公共项目。模型结果表明,没有适当减少信息不对称问题,预算规模的增减不能完全有效地控制两类公共项目之间的低效率预算分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Public Investment Decision-Making under Information Asymmetry
This study examines inefficient budget allocation between “certainly” public projects whose values are known to the public and “uncertainty” public projects whose values are not known to the public, where monitoring systems of government are less developed. Using a simple agency model in a political economy setting, we theoretically explain how information asymmetry and political agency costs induce inefficiency in public investments. A government agent with political concerns about the next election may primarily choose certainty public projects even if the certainty public projects are less socially beneficial than uncertainty public projects. The results of our model suggest that the increase/decrease in budget size without appropriately reducing information asymmetry problem cannot be a fully useful policy to control the inefficient budget allocation between two types of public projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-Nation Comparison on Mayors' Policy Preferences: Korea, Japan, and the USA Regional Financial Markets and Financial Restructuring in Korea Local Agenda 21: Seoul Toward an Environmental City Approximate Solutions for KI and COD in CCT and CT Specimens Subjected to Closure Obstruction on the Crack Surface The Use of Tourist Money Flow Analysis in Measuring the Impact of Tourism Development on the Regional Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1