Jan Kochanowski的《Foricoenia》和《Quattuor》中的Robortello

F. Cabras
{"title":"Jan Kochanowski的《Foricoenia》和《Quattuor》中的Robortello","authors":"F. Cabras","doi":"10.15804/iw.2021.12.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article aims to study Jan Kochanowski’s Foricoenia and Elegiarum Libri Quattuor in the light of Francesco Robortello’s treatise Eorum omnium quae ad methodum et artificium scribendi epigrammatis spectant explicatio . After having set Robortello’s treatise in its historical and literary context, the article shows how Jan Kochanowski, who probably attended Robortello’s classes during his first two stays in Padua (1552–1555; 1556–1557), agreed with the ideas presented in the treatise. The fact that Kochanowski agrees with his professor’s ideas on the epigram does not mean that he behaves in a totally passive and uncritical way, for he clearly shows his independence when writing his Latin epigrams, sometimes refusing to comply with Robortello’s suggestions (e.g., Kochanowski does not avoid the use of elegant and rare Graecisms, which Robortello advises against excessively using). Kochanowski owes Robortello his high consideration for Catullus: when imitating Catullus’s epigrams, Kochanowski often chooses to imitate (or to hint at) the same epigrams Robortello commends in his treatises (for instance, Cat. LXIX is clearly imitated in Foricoenia XXV, while Cat. XV is quoted in elegy I 7). We encounter the same situation when Kochanowski deals with Martial: although Robortello clearly prefers Catullus over Martial, he praises the love epigrams written by the latter poet, and Kochanowski, in writing his foricoenium CV, imitates Cat. XCIX as well as Mart. III 65 and XI 8, the latter two epigrams not quoted explicitly by Robortello, but chosen by Kochanowski himself.","PeriodicalId":424702,"journal":{"name":"Italica Wratislaviensia","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robortello nei Foricoenia e negli Elegiarum Libri Quattuor di Jan Kochanowski\",\"authors\":\"F. Cabras\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/iw.2021.12.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This article aims to study Jan Kochanowski’s Foricoenia and Elegiarum Libri Quattuor in the light of Francesco Robortello’s treatise Eorum omnium quae ad methodum et artificium scribendi epigrammatis spectant explicatio . After having set Robortello’s treatise in its historical and literary context, the article shows how Jan Kochanowski, who probably attended Robortello’s classes during his first two stays in Padua (1552–1555; 1556–1557), agreed with the ideas presented in the treatise. The fact that Kochanowski agrees with his professor’s ideas on the epigram does not mean that he behaves in a totally passive and uncritical way, for he clearly shows his independence when writing his Latin epigrams, sometimes refusing to comply with Robortello’s suggestions (e.g., Kochanowski does not avoid the use of elegant and rare Graecisms, which Robortello advises against excessively using). Kochanowski owes Robortello his high consideration for Catullus: when imitating Catullus’s epigrams, Kochanowski often chooses to imitate (or to hint at) the same epigrams Robortello commends in his treatises (for instance, Cat. LXIX is clearly imitated in Foricoenia XXV, while Cat. XV is quoted in elegy I 7). We encounter the same situation when Kochanowski deals with Martial: although Robortello clearly prefers Catullus over Martial, he praises the love epigrams written by the latter poet, and Kochanowski, in writing his foricoenium CV, imitates Cat. XCIX as well as Mart. III 65 and XI 8, the latter two epigrams not quoted explicitly by Robortello, but chosen by Kochanowski himself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italica Wratislaviensia\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italica Wratislaviensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/iw.2021.12.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italica Wratislaviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/iw.2021.12.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在借鉴罗博泰罗的著作《人之法》和《人工抄写警句的方法》,对科查诺夫斯基的《四世图书馆论》和《四世图书馆论》进行研究。在将罗博特罗的论文置于其历史和文学背景之后,这篇文章展示了Jan Kochanowski,他可能在罗博特罗在帕多瓦的头两次停留(1552-1555)期间参加了他的课程;(1556-1557),同意论文中提出的观点。Kochanowski同意他的教授关于警句的观点并不意味着他的行为是完全被动和不批判的,因为他在写拉丁警句时清楚地显示出他的独立性,有时拒绝遵守Robortello的建议(例如,Kochanowski不避免使用优雅和罕见的希腊语,而Robortello建议不要过度使用)。科查诺夫斯基对卡图卢斯给予了罗博泰罗很高的评价:在模仿卡图卢斯的警句时,科查诺夫斯基经常选择模仿(或暗示)罗博泰罗在他的论文中赞扬的警句(例如,《猫》)。LXIX显然是Foricoenia第二十五章所模仿的,而Cat。当Kochanowski处理Martial时,我们遇到了同样的情况:虽然Robortello显然更喜欢Catullus而不是Martial,但他赞扬了后者写的爱情警句,Kochanowski在写他的foricoenium CV时模仿了Cat。XCIX和Mart。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robortello nei Foricoenia e negli Elegiarum Libri Quattuor di Jan Kochanowski
: This article aims to study Jan Kochanowski’s Foricoenia and Elegiarum Libri Quattuor in the light of Francesco Robortello’s treatise Eorum omnium quae ad methodum et artificium scribendi epigrammatis spectant explicatio . After having set Robortello’s treatise in its historical and literary context, the article shows how Jan Kochanowski, who probably attended Robortello’s classes during his first two stays in Padua (1552–1555; 1556–1557), agreed with the ideas presented in the treatise. The fact that Kochanowski agrees with his professor’s ideas on the epigram does not mean that he behaves in a totally passive and uncritical way, for he clearly shows his independence when writing his Latin epigrams, sometimes refusing to comply with Robortello’s suggestions (e.g., Kochanowski does not avoid the use of elegant and rare Graecisms, which Robortello advises against excessively using). Kochanowski owes Robortello his high consideration for Catullus: when imitating Catullus’s epigrams, Kochanowski often chooses to imitate (or to hint at) the same epigrams Robortello commends in his treatises (for instance, Cat. LXIX is clearly imitated in Foricoenia XXV, while Cat. XV is quoted in elegy I 7). We encounter the same situation when Kochanowski deals with Martial: although Robortello clearly prefers Catullus over Martial, he praises the love epigrams written by the latter poet, and Kochanowski, in writing his foricoenium CV, imitates Cat. XCIX as well as Mart. III 65 and XI 8, the latter two epigrams not quoted explicitly by Robortello, but chosen by Kochanowski himself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bibliografia dell’italianistica polacca del 2021 Andrea Camilleri in Polonia: un contributo alla ricerca Il libro degli animali di Mario Rigoni Stern: un messaggio ecologıco rivolto ai ragazzi Lumberjanes e Hilda, serie a fumetti scout tra ecocritica ed ecofemminismo Letteratura per l’infanzia e l’adolescenza dal/del Nord-Est Italia. Una analisi degli eco-assi da Salgari a Scarpa (1901–2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1