{"title":"填补空白","authors":"B. Frier","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780197573211.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Roman system of contracts left out of account many agreements that deserved enforcement, especially in a developed economy. The jurists clearly recognized the limits of their system, in particular the sometimes obscure boundaries of recognized contracts and the difficulty in recognizing new ones. For agreements that could not be accommodated, they eventually developed a rather awkward mechanism whereby, in principle, a contractual promise only became enforceable after one party performed its side, after which it could demand that the other party either carry out its promise or provide restitution of unjustified enrichment. This mechanism provides relief, but is obviously imperfect. Still, the jurists were at least willing to carry over from the recognized contracts some implied rights and duties.","PeriodicalId":181337,"journal":{"name":"A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filling in the Gaps\",\"authors\":\"B. Frier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780197573211.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Roman system of contracts left out of account many agreements that deserved enforcement, especially in a developed economy. The jurists clearly recognized the limits of their system, in particular the sometimes obscure boundaries of recognized contracts and the difficulty in recognizing new ones. For agreements that could not be accommodated, they eventually developed a rather awkward mechanism whereby, in principle, a contractual promise only became enforceable after one party performed its side, after which it could demand that the other party either carry out its promise or provide restitution of unjustified enrichment. This mechanism provides relief, but is obviously imperfect. Still, the jurists were at least willing to carry over from the recognized contracts some implied rights and duties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780197573211.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780197573211.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗马的合同制度忽略了许多值得执行的协议,特别是在发达经济体中。法学家们清楚地认识到他们的制度的局限性,特别是有时被承认的合同的界限模糊不清,以及承认新合同的困难。对于无法适应的协议,它们最终发展出一种相当尴尬的机制,即在原则上,合同承诺只有在一方履行其义务后才具有可执行性,之后它可以要求另一方履行其承诺或归还不合理的致富。这种机制提供了缓解,但显然是不完善的。不过,法学家们至少愿意从公认的合同中保留一些默示的权利和义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Filling in the Gaps
The Roman system of contracts left out of account many agreements that deserved enforcement, especially in a developed economy. The jurists clearly recognized the limits of their system, in particular the sometimes obscure boundaries of recognized contracts and the difficulty in recognizing new ones. For agreements that could not be accommodated, they eventually developed a rather awkward mechanism whereby, in principle, a contractual promise only became enforceable after one party performed its side, after which it could demand that the other party either carry out its promise or provide restitution of unjustified enrichment. This mechanism provides relief, but is obviously imperfect. Still, the jurists were at least willing to carry over from the recognized contracts some implied rights and duties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Roman Contract Law Quasi-Contract Capacity to Contract Filling in the Gaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1