关系资本和媒体品牌

S. Erickson, Helen Rothberg
{"title":"关系资本和媒体品牌","authors":"S. Erickson, Helen Rothberg","doi":"10.34190/eckm.24.1.1350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuing a research program studying new metrics for relational capital, this paper reports on a new analysis of media brands, both traditional and newer entrants.  Relational capital is a key aspect of the knowledge assets or intellectual capital of the firm.  Unlike human capital (job-related knowledge) or structural capital (knowledge incorporated into the firm itself), relational capital has to do with external relationships.  Specifically, knowledge about handling external relationships, especially those with customers.  Relational capital is not a widely studied topic in knowledge management (KM) or intellectual capital (IC), including potential metrics.  Brand equity, on the other hand, is an idea from another field that is well-known and much studied.  While not the same concept as relational capital, it is clearly related as brand equity comes from a history of customer interactions and the value of the relationships built by the firm.  Better knowledge of what satisfies customers plays an obvious role in building brand equity.  But brand equity does not have a single, recognized method for calculation.  Annual reports and rankings from marketing consulting firms routinely provide estimates of brand equity for high-value, well-known brands.  Most of the other brands, not so much.  Even so, if we know the brands with the highest equity values and can tie some additional metrics to that status, we can begin to uncover the level of customer knowledge held by individual firms and, by extension, relational capital in a wider variety of organizations.  This study focuses on a brand sentiment analysis, using commercial software from Salesforce Social Studio.  The web-scraping software collects mentions of a brand (or any keyword) across the web, not only social media but reviews, aggregators, and other sources of brand commentary.  From that capability, an assessment of the brand’s meaning to users can be assessed at a point in time.  In particular, this study looked at established media brands (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.) and new media brands (Buzzfeed, Techcrunch, etc.) over a three-month period in early 2023.  Data were collected on brand activity (volume), sentiment (positive/negative), sources, influencers, country of origin/language, and other indicators, including the variance of all the above measures.  From there, comparisons can be made across the more established brands and the developing ones, as well as to high-equity brands from other industries (covered in other studies).  As noted, some suggestions can then be made concerning what metrics to track over time to assess the ongoing value of relational capital.","PeriodicalId":107011,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational Capital & Media Brands\",\"authors\":\"S. Erickson, Helen Rothberg\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/eckm.24.1.1350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Continuing a research program studying new metrics for relational capital, this paper reports on a new analysis of media brands, both traditional and newer entrants.  Relational capital is a key aspect of the knowledge assets or intellectual capital of the firm.  Unlike human capital (job-related knowledge) or structural capital (knowledge incorporated into the firm itself), relational capital has to do with external relationships.  Specifically, knowledge about handling external relationships, especially those with customers.  Relational capital is not a widely studied topic in knowledge management (KM) or intellectual capital (IC), including potential metrics.  Brand equity, on the other hand, is an idea from another field that is well-known and much studied.  While not the same concept as relational capital, it is clearly related as brand equity comes from a history of customer interactions and the value of the relationships built by the firm.  Better knowledge of what satisfies customers plays an obvious role in building brand equity.  But brand equity does not have a single, recognized method for calculation.  Annual reports and rankings from marketing consulting firms routinely provide estimates of brand equity for high-value, well-known brands.  Most of the other brands, not so much.  Even so, if we know the brands with the highest equity values and can tie some additional metrics to that status, we can begin to uncover the level of customer knowledge held by individual firms and, by extension, relational capital in a wider variety of organizations.  This study focuses on a brand sentiment analysis, using commercial software from Salesforce Social Studio.  The web-scraping software collects mentions of a brand (or any keyword) across the web, not only social media but reviews, aggregators, and other sources of brand commentary.  From that capability, an assessment of the brand’s meaning to users can be assessed at a point in time.  In particular, this study looked at established media brands (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.) and new media brands (Buzzfeed, Techcrunch, etc.) over a three-month period in early 2023.  Data were collected on brand activity (volume), sentiment (positive/negative), sources, influencers, country of origin/language, and other indicators, including the variance of all the above measures.  From there, comparisons can be made across the more established brands and the developing ones, as well as to high-equity brands from other industries (covered in other studies).  As noted, some suggestions can then be made concerning what metrics to track over time to assess the ongoing value of relational capital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Conference on Knowledge Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Conference on Knowledge Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.1.1350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.1.1350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文继续研究关系资本的新指标,对传统和新进入者的媒体品牌进行了新的分析。关系资本是企业知识资产或智力资本的一个重要方面。与人力资本(与工作相关的知识)或结构资本(融入企业自身的知识)不同,关系资本与外部关系有关。具体地说,是处理外部关系的知识,尤其是与客户的关系。关系资本并不是知识管理(KM)或智力资本(IC)中广泛研究的话题,包括潜在指标。另一方面,品牌资产是一个来自另一个领域的概念,它是众所周知的,也得到了很多研究。虽然与关系资本不是同一个概念,但它显然与品牌资产相关,因为品牌资产来自客户互动的历史和公司建立的关系的价值。更好地了解什么能让顾客满意,在建立品牌资产方面发挥着明显的作用。但品牌资产并没有一个公认的单一计算方法。营销咨询公司的年度报告和排名通常会提供高价值知名品牌的品牌资产估值。大多数其他品牌,没有这么多。即便如此,如果我们知道拥有最高股权价值的品牌,并将一些额外的指标与该地位联系起来,我们就可以开始揭示单个公司所拥有的客户知识水平,进而揭示更广泛组织中的关系资本。本研究着重于品牌情感分析,使用Salesforce Social Studio的商业软件。网络抓取软件收集网络上提及的品牌(或任何关键字),不仅包括社交媒体,还包括评论、聚合器和其他品牌评论来源。根据这种能力,可以在某个时间点评估品牌对用户的意义。特别是,这项研究在2023年初的三个月时间里调查了老牌媒体品牌(《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》等)和新媒体品牌(Buzzfeed、Techcrunch等)。收集了关于品牌活动(数量)、情绪(积极/消极)、来源、影响者、原产国/语言和其他指标的数据,包括上述所有措施的差异。在此基础上,可以比较更成熟的品牌和发展中的品牌,以及来自其他行业的高净值品牌(在其他研究中有涉及)。如前所述,然后可以提出一些建议,涉及随着时间的推移跟踪哪些指标以评估关系资本的持续价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relational Capital & Media Brands
Continuing a research program studying new metrics for relational capital, this paper reports on a new analysis of media brands, both traditional and newer entrants.  Relational capital is a key aspect of the knowledge assets or intellectual capital of the firm.  Unlike human capital (job-related knowledge) or structural capital (knowledge incorporated into the firm itself), relational capital has to do with external relationships.  Specifically, knowledge about handling external relationships, especially those with customers.  Relational capital is not a widely studied topic in knowledge management (KM) or intellectual capital (IC), including potential metrics.  Brand equity, on the other hand, is an idea from another field that is well-known and much studied.  While not the same concept as relational capital, it is clearly related as brand equity comes from a history of customer interactions and the value of the relationships built by the firm.  Better knowledge of what satisfies customers plays an obvious role in building brand equity.  But brand equity does not have a single, recognized method for calculation.  Annual reports and rankings from marketing consulting firms routinely provide estimates of brand equity for high-value, well-known brands.  Most of the other brands, not so much.  Even so, if we know the brands with the highest equity values and can tie some additional metrics to that status, we can begin to uncover the level of customer knowledge held by individual firms and, by extension, relational capital in a wider variety of organizations.  This study focuses on a brand sentiment analysis, using commercial software from Salesforce Social Studio.  The web-scraping software collects mentions of a brand (or any keyword) across the web, not only social media but reviews, aggregators, and other sources of brand commentary.  From that capability, an assessment of the brand’s meaning to users can be assessed at a point in time.  In particular, this study looked at established media brands (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.) and new media brands (Buzzfeed, Techcrunch, etc.) over a three-month period in early 2023.  Data were collected on brand activity (volume), sentiment (positive/negative), sources, influencers, country of origin/language, and other indicators, including the variance of all the above measures.  From there, comparisons can be made across the more established brands and the developing ones, as well as to high-equity brands from other industries (covered in other studies).  As noted, some suggestions can then be made concerning what metrics to track over time to assess the ongoing value of relational capital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Psychological Contracts in Knowledge Sharing Through Startups Knowledge Transfer in the Craft Beer Business Networks in Portugal Meaning of the Power Users in the Wikipedia Working Environment Effectiveness of the Lessons Learned Process in ESA OPS Directorate Knowledge Management and Interorganizational Networks of the Wine Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1