英国电力市场转型中的可选性与决策

M. Chronopoulos, D. Bunn, A. Siddiqui
{"title":"英国电力市场转型中的可选性与决策","authors":"M. Chronopoulos, D. Bunn, A. Siddiqui","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.3.2.MCHR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional models to support policymaking for the energy sector have been largely based on deterministic or static settings that focus on planning welfare- maximising investment pathways. But, in a liberalised market, since investments are made by competitive, profit-maximising companies, the increased intervention of government policy in the trading arrangements creates uncertain responses to incentives. Industry may perceive policy risks to be high, and major companies may choose to act more cautiously than governments expect. This presents a modelling challenge, and we propose an extension to the use of real options in this context. We model several features of the low-carbon investment context, viz., irreversibility, delay, and competition, which impinge upon the radical policy imperatives for structural change in electricity markets to meet ambitious sustainability targets.","PeriodicalId":385400,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optionality and Policymaking in Re-Transforming the British Power Market\",\"authors\":\"M. Chronopoulos, D. Bunn, A. Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.5547/2160-5890.3.2.MCHR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional models to support policymaking for the energy sector have been largely based on deterministic or static settings that focus on planning welfare- maximising investment pathways. But, in a liberalised market, since investments are made by competitive, profit-maximising companies, the increased intervention of government policy in the trading arrangements creates uncertain responses to incentives. Industry may perceive policy risks to be high, and major companies may choose to act more cautiously than governments expect. This presents a modelling challenge, and we propose an extension to the use of real options in this context. We model several features of the low-carbon investment context, viz., irreversibility, delay, and competition, which impinge upon the radical policy imperatives for structural change in electricity markets to meet ambitious sustainability targets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.3.2.MCHR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.3.2.MCHR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

支持能源部门政策制定的传统模型在很大程度上基于确定性或静态设置,这些设置侧重于规划福利最大化的投资途径。但是,在一个自由化的市场中,由于投资是由追求利润最大化的竞争性企业进行的,政府政策对贸易安排的干预力度加大,会对激励措施产生不确定的反应。行业可能认为政策风险很高,大公司可能会选择比政府预期更谨慎的行动。这提出了一个建模挑战,我们建议在这种情况下扩展使用实物期权。我们模拟了低碳投资环境的几个特征,即不可逆性、延迟性和竞争性,这些特征影响到电力市场结构性变革的激进政策要求,以实现雄心勃勃的可持续性目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optionality and Policymaking in Re-Transforming the British Power Market
Conventional models to support policymaking for the energy sector have been largely based on deterministic or static settings that focus on planning welfare- maximising investment pathways. But, in a liberalised market, since investments are made by competitive, profit-maximising companies, the increased intervention of government policy in the trading arrangements creates uncertain responses to incentives. Industry may perceive policy risks to be high, and major companies may choose to act more cautiously than governments expect. This presents a modelling challenge, and we propose an extension to the use of real options in this context. We model several features of the low-carbon investment context, viz., irreversibility, delay, and competition, which impinge upon the radical policy imperatives for structural change in electricity markets to meet ambitious sustainability targets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Transmission Expansion to Support Efficient Decarbonization of the Electricity Sector Modelling Net Zero and Sector Coupling: Lessons for European Policy Makers The Cost of Finance and the Cost of Carbon: A Case Study of Britain’s only PWR Biomethane for Electricity in Mexico: A Prospective Economic Analysis Aiming for Carbon Neutrality: Which Environmental Taxes Does Spain Need by 2030?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1