观点环保口号:解读分歧的模因

C. Fabricius, Samantha McCulloch
{"title":"观点环保口号:解读分歧的模因","authors":"C. Fabricius, Samantha McCulloch","doi":"10.4314/SAJEE.V32I1.152746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental slogans can be seen as memes, i.e. cultural constructs that, not unlike genes, replicate themselves from one generation to the next. Memes may, however, be divergently interpreted and some memes can even have unwanted side-effects. We wanted to find out how supporters of an environmental non-governmental organisation (NGO) interpreted their slogan ‘People Caring for the Earth’. During a celebratory event of one of the NGO’s branches we asked 65 supporters of the organisation to write down their interpretation of the meaning of the slogan, as well as the actions that they regularly engage in to give substance to it. Fifty-eight per cent of the 34 respondents gave social-ecological systems  interpretations of ‘Caring for the Earth’ and interpreted it as humans living  sustainably with nature. Their associated actions centred around sustainable living principles. Forty-two per cent of respondents held strong naturecentric interpretations of the slogan, understanding it as a call to conserve species and ecosystems. Their associated actions centred around awareness raising and educating others. While these were broad patterns rather than exclusive, distinct categories, our results suggest that environmental memes should be used with circumspection, that their meaning should be clarified through actions rather than words, and that organisations should give as much attention to the meaning of their slogan as they do to the environmental causes they aim to address. The way  environmental slogans are perpetuated within an organisation has implications for the membership they attract or deter.","PeriodicalId":272843,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viewpoint Environmental Slogans: Memes with Diverging Interpretations\",\"authors\":\"C. Fabricius, Samantha McCulloch\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SAJEE.V32I1.152746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental slogans can be seen as memes, i.e. cultural constructs that, not unlike genes, replicate themselves from one generation to the next. Memes may, however, be divergently interpreted and some memes can even have unwanted side-effects. We wanted to find out how supporters of an environmental non-governmental organisation (NGO) interpreted their slogan ‘People Caring for the Earth’. During a celebratory event of one of the NGO’s branches we asked 65 supporters of the organisation to write down their interpretation of the meaning of the slogan, as well as the actions that they regularly engage in to give substance to it. Fifty-eight per cent of the 34 respondents gave social-ecological systems  interpretations of ‘Caring for the Earth’ and interpreted it as humans living  sustainably with nature. Their associated actions centred around sustainable living principles. Forty-two per cent of respondents held strong naturecentric interpretations of the slogan, understanding it as a call to conserve species and ecosystems. Their associated actions centred around awareness raising and educating others. While these were broad patterns rather than exclusive, distinct categories, our results suggest that environmental memes should be used with circumspection, that their meaning should be clarified through actions rather than words, and that organisations should give as much attention to the meaning of their slogan as they do to the environmental causes they aim to address. The way  environmental slogans are perpetuated within an organisation has implications for the membership they attract or deter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJEE.V32I1.152746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJEE.V32I1.152746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境口号可以被视为模因,即文化结构,与基因一样,从一代复制到下一代。然而,模因可能会被不同地解释,有些模因甚至会产生意想不到的副作用。我们想知道一个环保非政府组织(NGO)的支持者是如何理解他们的口号“人们关心地球”的。在一个非政府组织分支机构的庆祝活动中,我们请65名组织支持者写下他们对口号含义的理解,以及他们为实现口号而经常采取的行动。在34名受访者中,58%的人给出了“关爱地球”的社会生态系统解释,并将其解释为人类与自然的可持续生活。他们的相关行动以可持续生活原则为中心。42%的受访者对这一口号持强烈的以自然为中心的解读,将其理解为保护物种和生态系统的呼吁。他们的相关行动以提高认识和教育他人为中心。虽然这些都是广泛的模式,而不是排他的、不同的类别,但我们的研究结果表明,环境模因应该谨慎使用,它们的含义应该通过行动而不是语言来澄清,组织应该像关注他们旨在解决的环境问题一样关注他们口号的含义。环境口号在一个组织内流传的方式会影响到它们吸引或阻止的成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Viewpoint Environmental Slogans: Memes with Diverging Interpretations
Environmental slogans can be seen as memes, i.e. cultural constructs that, not unlike genes, replicate themselves from one generation to the next. Memes may, however, be divergently interpreted and some memes can even have unwanted side-effects. We wanted to find out how supporters of an environmental non-governmental organisation (NGO) interpreted their slogan ‘People Caring for the Earth’. During a celebratory event of one of the NGO’s branches we asked 65 supporters of the organisation to write down their interpretation of the meaning of the slogan, as well as the actions that they regularly engage in to give substance to it. Fifty-eight per cent of the 34 respondents gave social-ecological systems  interpretations of ‘Caring for the Earth’ and interpreted it as humans living  sustainably with nature. Their associated actions centred around sustainable living principles. Forty-two per cent of respondents held strong naturecentric interpretations of the slogan, understanding it as a call to conserve species and ecosystems. Their associated actions centred around awareness raising and educating others. While these were broad patterns rather than exclusive, distinct categories, our results suggest that environmental memes should be used with circumspection, that their meaning should be clarified through actions rather than words, and that organisations should give as much attention to the meaning of their slogan as they do to the environmental causes they aim to address. The way  environmental slogans are perpetuated within an organisation has implications for the membership they attract or deter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating Environmental Awareness using an Eco-Feedback Application at a Higher Education Institution The Practice of Environmental Training: A case of ISO 14001 Certified Businesses in Durban, South Africa Use of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Crop and Livestock Production and Implication to Social Ecology: A Case Study of Chimanimani District of Zimbabwe Challenges of Teaching Akans (Ghana) Culturally-Specific Environmental Ethics in Senior High Schools: Voices of Akans and Biology Teachers Territory and ontology in the educational practices of an indigenous Zapotecan community in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1