77国集团与经济外交:非洲粮食安全的挑战与前景

B. Nkrumah
{"title":"77国集团与经济外交:非洲粮食安全的挑战与前景","authors":"B. Nkrumah","doi":"10.25159/0256-6060/465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing countries demonstrated their collective commitment to address their common economic problems through the formation of the Group of 77 (G77). The coalition has attempted to use its caucus to influence the reform of major international  trade  and  investment  policies  through  the  United  Nations  (UN)  fora. Two of such successes were the adoption of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). These instruments seek to improve Africa’s poverty and food insecurity by making the international market  accessible  to  African  farmers  and  prevent  dumping  of  developed countries’ agricultural commodities through phasing out high subsidies. Yet, to adopt a legal instrument at the UN level is one thing, but to implement it by states is another. These and other agro-trade initiatives have grossly failed to benefit the  African  rural  farmers  and  combat  chronic  hunger.  Against  this  backdrop,   it is logical to conclude that the G77 has failed to transform its lofty ideal into  practice.  In  summary,  while  this  bloc  of  nations  has  previously  managed  to   maintain some degree of solidarity along essential socio-economic issues, the existence  of  its  internal  differences  remain  worrying  for  the  advancement  of   Africa’s food security agenda","PeriodicalId":442570,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Report","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The G77 and economic diplomacy : challenges and prospects for Africa's food security\",\"authors\":\"B. Nkrumah\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/0256-6060/465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developing countries demonstrated their collective commitment to address their common economic problems through the formation of the Group of 77 (G77). The coalition has attempted to use its caucus to influence the reform of major international  trade  and  investment  policies  through  the  United  Nations  (UN)  fora. Two of such successes were the adoption of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). These instruments seek to improve Africa’s poverty and food insecurity by making the international market  accessible  to  African  farmers  and  prevent  dumping  of  developed countries’ agricultural commodities through phasing out high subsidies. Yet, to adopt a legal instrument at the UN level is one thing, but to implement it by states is another. These and other agro-trade initiatives have grossly failed to benefit the  African  rural  farmers  and  combat  chronic  hunger.  Against  this  backdrop,   it is logical to conclude that the G77 has failed to transform its lofty ideal into  practice.  In  summary,  while  this  bloc  of  nations  has  previously  managed  to   maintain some degree of solidarity along essential socio-economic issues, the existence  of  its  internal  differences  remain  worrying  for  the  advancement  of   Africa’s food security agenda\",\"PeriodicalId\":442570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Report\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

发展中国家通过成立77国集团(77国集团)表明了它们解决共同经济问题的集体承诺。该联盟试图利用其核心小组通过联合国论坛影响主要国际贸易和投资政策的改革。其中两个成功是普遍优惠制(GSP)和农业协定(AoA)的通过。这些文书力求改善非洲的贫穷和粮食不安全状况,办法是使非洲农民能够进入国际市场,并通过逐步取消高额补贴来防止发达国家的农产品倾销。然而,在联合国层面通过一项法律文书是一回事,但由国家执行又是另一回事。这些和其他农业贸易倡议严重未能使非洲农村农民受益,也未能战胜长期饥饿。在这种背景下,我们有理由认为,77国集团未能将其崇高的理想转化为现实。总而言之,虽然这个国家集团以前曾设法在基本的社会经济问题上保持一定程度的团结,但其内部分歧的存在仍然令人担忧,影响着非洲粮食安全议程的推进
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The G77 and economic diplomacy : challenges and prospects for Africa's food security
Developing countries demonstrated their collective commitment to address their common economic problems through the formation of the Group of 77 (G77). The coalition has attempted to use its caucus to influence the reform of major international  trade  and  investment  policies  through  the  United  Nations  (UN)  fora. Two of such successes were the adoption of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). These instruments seek to improve Africa’s poverty and food insecurity by making the international market  accessible  to  African  farmers  and  prevent  dumping  of  developed countries’ agricultural commodities through phasing out high subsidies. Yet, to adopt a legal instrument at the UN level is one thing, but to implement it by states is another. These and other agro-trade initiatives have grossly failed to benefit the  African  rural  farmers  and  combat  chronic  hunger.  Against  this  backdrop,   it is logical to conclude that the G77 has failed to transform its lofty ideal into  practice.  In  summary,  while  this  bloc  of  nations  has  previously  managed  to   maintain some degree of solidarity along essential socio-economic issues, the existence  of  its  internal  differences  remain  worrying  for  the  advancement  of   Africa’s food security agenda
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Underlying Drivers of Transnational Terrorism in Africa’s Sahel Region and Counter-terrorism Policy Interventions Echoes from the Global South: Reflections on the Student Public Intellectual, Hashtags and Neoliberal Themes in the #FeesMustFall Student Protests in South Africa (2015–2016) Geopolitical Conflict around the Climate Emergency: The Case of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Latin America and the Caribbean: Trends Outlook for Quarter 1, 2020 Can ASEAN Play a Leading Role in Resolving Myanmar’s Crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1