2000-2019年中美创业话语的跨文化比较研究

Jaeyeon Jang, Byungjun Kim, Kveo Re Lee, J. Kim
{"title":"2000-2019年中美创业话语的跨文化比较研究","authors":"Jaeyeon Jang, Byungjun Kim, Kveo Re Lee, J. Kim","doi":"10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores significant cultural differences on startup discourses between United States and China by demonstrating a big data analysis through Structural Topic Modeling. Results and findings were interpreted with Hofstede”s cultural dimensions, indicating that the conventional theory of social science was applicable when it comes to explaining technological subjects","PeriodicalId":275121,"journal":{"name":"2021 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study on the Startup Discourse in 2000–2019 between United States and China\",\"authors\":\"Jaeyeon Jang, Byungjun Kim, Kveo Re Lee, J. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay explores significant cultural differences on startup discourses between United States and China by demonstrating a big data analysis through Structural Topic Modeling. Results and findings were interpreted with Hofstede”s cultural dimensions, indicating that the conventional theory of social science was applicable when it comes to explaining technological subjects\",\"PeriodicalId\":275121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过结构主题模型的大数据分析,探讨了中美两国创业话语的显著文化差异。结果和发现用Hofstede的文化维度来解释,表明传统的社会科学理论在解释技术主题时是适用的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study on the Startup Discourse in 2000–2019 between United States and China
This essay explores significant cultural differences on startup discourses between United States and China by demonstrating a big data analysis through Structural Topic Modeling. Results and findings were interpreted with Hofstede”s cultural dimensions, indicating that the conventional theory of social science was applicable when it comes to explaining technological subjects
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On a Partially Verifiable Multi-party Multi-argument Zero-knowledge Proof EnvBERT: Multi-Label Text Classification for Imbalanced, Noisy Environmental News Data Method for Changing Users' Attitudes Towards Fashion Styling by Showing Evaluations After Coordinate Selection The Analysis of Web Search Snippets Displaying User's Knowledge An Energy Management System with Edge Computing for Industrial Facility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1