自检检查器的多卡故障可测试性

T. Nanya, S. Mourad, E. McCluskey
{"title":"自检检查器的多卡故障可测试性","authors":"T. Nanya, S. Mourad, E. McCluskey","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1988.5347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a feasibility study on offline testing of VLSI systems with concurrent error checking capability, the multiple fault testability is evaluated for self-testing checkers. New offline testing schema called codeword testing and noncodeword testing are introduced, in which all codewords and a small number of noncodewords are used as test inputs and the checker outputs are observed to decide if the circuit under test is faulty or not. It is proved that all the multiple stuck-at faults in tree-structured two-rail code checkers are detected with codeword testing followed by noncodeword testing. It is shown by simulation experiments that codeword testing can detect more than 99% of all possible double and triple faults in existing self-testing checkers for two-rail codes, Berger codes, and k-out-of-2k codes. The simulation experiments also show that all of the double and triple faults that elude the codeword testing are detected by noncodeword testing in which a small number of noncodewords are needed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":171148,"journal":{"name":"[1988] The Eighteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers","volume":"131 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple stuck-at fault testability of self-testing checkers\",\"authors\":\"T. Nanya, S. Mourad, E. McCluskey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FTCS.1988.5347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a feasibility study on offline testing of VLSI systems with concurrent error checking capability, the multiple fault testability is evaluated for self-testing checkers. New offline testing schema called codeword testing and noncodeword testing are introduced, in which all codewords and a small number of noncodewords are used as test inputs and the checker outputs are observed to decide if the circuit under test is faulty or not. It is proved that all the multiple stuck-at faults in tree-structured two-rail code checkers are detected with codeword testing followed by noncodeword testing. It is shown by simulation experiments that codeword testing can detect more than 99% of all possible double and triple faults in existing self-testing checkers for two-rail codes, Berger codes, and k-out-of-2k codes. The simulation experiments also show that all of the double and triple faults that elude the codeword testing are detected by noncodeword testing in which a small number of noncodewords are needed.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":171148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] The Eighteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers\",\"volume\":\"131 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] The Eighteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1988.5347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] The Eighteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1988.5347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

作为具有并发错误检测能力的超大规模集成电路系统离线测试的可行性研究,对自检检测器的多故障可测试性进行了评估。引入了一种新的离线测试模式,即码字测试和非码字测试,将所有的码字和少量的非码字作为测试输入,通过观察检查器输出来判断被测电路是否故障。证明了用码字测试和非码字测试来检测树结构双轨码检器的多卡故障。仿真实验表明,在现有的双轨码、伯杰码和k-out- 2k码自检检查器中,码字测试可以检测出99%以上的可能的双重和三重故障。仿真实验还表明,在只需要少量非码字的情况下,所有无法通过码字检测的双重和三重故障都可以通过非码字检测出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiple stuck-at fault testability of self-testing checkers
As a feasibility study on offline testing of VLSI systems with concurrent error checking capability, the multiple fault testability is evaluated for self-testing checkers. New offline testing schema called codeword testing and noncodeword testing are introduced, in which all codewords and a small number of noncodewords are used as test inputs and the checker outputs are observed to decide if the circuit under test is faulty or not. It is proved that all the multiple stuck-at faults in tree-structured two-rail code checkers are detected with codeword testing followed by noncodeword testing. It is shown by simulation experiments that codeword testing can detect more than 99% of all possible double and triple faults in existing self-testing checkers for two-rail codes, Berger codes, and k-out-of-2k codes. The simulation experiments also show that all of the double and triple faults that elude the codeword testing are detected by noncodeword testing in which a small number of noncodewords are needed.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of workload influence on dependability Reliability analysis of non repairable systems using stochastic Petri nets Advanced automatic test pattern generation and redundancy identification techniques An on-line error-detectable array divider with a redundant binary representation and a residue code An efficient multi-dimensional grids reconfiguration algorithm on hypercube
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1