比较印尼的国家标准和非国家标准的碳水化合物水平

Nurfadilah Nurfadilah, Anton Yuntarso, Dheasy Herawati
{"title":"比较印尼的国家标准和非国家标准的碳水化合物水平","authors":"Nurfadilah Nurfadilah, Anton Yuntarso, Dheasy Herawati","doi":"10.51804/jsh.v3i2.601.37-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbohydrates are a source of energy needed by the body because carbohydrates are an important food component. According to SNI (Standar Nasional Indonesia), carbohydrate content in food must not be less than 60%. In this study, researchers wanted to compare the method of determining carbohydrate content according to SNI and according to AOAC (Non-SNI), both methods used Luff Schoorl, in the SNI method there was an addition of CH3COOH, whereas the Non-SNI method did not add CH3COOH. In this study a sample of a mixture of glucose, sucrose and NaCl was used. From the research results obtained indicate that there is a difference between the SNI method and Non-SNI method, where the Non-SNI method is better used at a 10% sample concentration with 250X dilution and 20% sample concentration at 500x dilution, whereas on the SNI method is better used at 30% sample concentration with 500X dilution, and the accuracy value obtained is 94.14% to 97.23%.","PeriodicalId":326360,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal SainHealth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERBANDINGAN METODE STANDAR NASIONAL INDONESIA DAN NON STANDAR NASIONAL INDONESIA DALAM PENENTUAN KADAR KARBOHIDRAT TOTAL\",\"authors\":\"Nurfadilah Nurfadilah, Anton Yuntarso, Dheasy Herawati\",\"doi\":\"10.51804/jsh.v3i2.601.37-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Carbohydrates are a source of energy needed by the body because carbohydrates are an important food component. According to SNI (Standar Nasional Indonesia), carbohydrate content in food must not be less than 60%. In this study, researchers wanted to compare the method of determining carbohydrate content according to SNI and according to AOAC (Non-SNI), both methods used Luff Schoorl, in the SNI method there was an addition of CH3COOH, whereas the Non-SNI method did not add CH3COOH. In this study a sample of a mixture of glucose, sucrose and NaCl was used. From the research results obtained indicate that there is a difference between the SNI method and Non-SNI method, where the Non-SNI method is better used at a 10% sample concentration with 250X dilution and 20% sample concentration at 500x dilution, whereas on the SNI method is better used at 30% sample concentration with 500X dilution, and the accuracy value obtained is 94.14% to 97.23%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal SainHealth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal SainHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51804/jsh.v3i2.601.37-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal SainHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51804/jsh.v3i2.601.37-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳水化合物是人体所需能量的来源,因为碳水化合物是重要的食物成分。根据SNI (standard Nasional Indonesia),食品中的碳水化合物含量不得低于60%。在本研究中,研究者想比较根据SNI和根据AOAC (Non-SNI)测定碳水化合物含量的方法,两种方法都使用了Luff Schoorl, SNI方法中添加了CH3COOH,而Non-SNI方法没有添加CH3COOH。在本研究中,使用了葡萄糖、蔗糖和NaCl的混合物样品。从得到的研究结果来看,SNI方法与非SNI方法存在差异,其中非SNI方法在10%的样品浓度、250倍的稀释和20%的样品浓度、500倍的稀释下使用效果较好,而SNI方法在30%的样品浓度、500倍的稀释下使用效果较好,得到的准确度值为94.14% ~ 97.23%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PERBANDINGAN METODE STANDAR NASIONAL INDONESIA DAN NON STANDAR NASIONAL INDONESIA DALAM PENENTUAN KADAR KARBOHIDRAT TOTAL
Carbohydrates are a source of energy needed by the body because carbohydrates are an important food component. According to SNI (Standar Nasional Indonesia), carbohydrate content in food must not be less than 60%. In this study, researchers wanted to compare the method of determining carbohydrate content according to SNI and according to AOAC (Non-SNI), both methods used Luff Schoorl, in the SNI method there was an addition of CH3COOH, whereas the Non-SNI method did not add CH3COOH. In this study a sample of a mixture of glucose, sucrose and NaCl was used. From the research results obtained indicate that there is a difference between the SNI method and Non-SNI method, where the Non-SNI method is better used at a 10% sample concentration with 250X dilution and 20% sample concentration at 500x dilution, whereas on the SNI method is better used at 30% sample concentration with 500X dilution, and the accuracy value obtained is 94.14% to 97.23%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS KADAR FERRITIN SERUM DENGAN NILAI LAJU ENDAP DARAH PADA IBU HAMIL TRIMESTER II PENGARUH VARIASI WAKTU SENTRIFUGASI NILAI HEMATOKRIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE MIKROHEMATOKRIT DI UNIVERSITAS BINAWAN PERBANDINGAN HASIL MIKROSKOPIS LANJUTAN PENDERITA TBC PARU SETELAH PENGOBATAN DENGAN RIWAYAT DM DAN TANPA DM DI PUSKESMAS KEDUNDUNG EVALUASI HAPUSAN DARAH TEPI DARAH K3EDTA SEGERA DI PERIKSA DAN DI TUNDA 24 JAM DALAM SUHU 2-8C IDENTIFIKASI TELUR SOIL TRANSMITTED HELMINT (STH) PADA TANAH PERSAWAHAN DI DESA SUKODONO MENGGUNAKAN METODE NATIF
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1