竞争的单向基本补充:网络中立性被遗忘的一面

Sébastien Broos, A. Gautier
{"title":"竞争的单向基本补充:网络中立性被遗忘的一面","authors":"Sébastien Broos, A. Gautier","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2570924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the incentives of internet service providers (ISPs) to break net neutrality by excluding internet applications competing with their own products, a typical example being the exclusion of VoIP applications by telecom companies offering internet and voice services. Exclusion is not a concern when the ISP is a monopoly because it can extract the additional surplus created by the application through price rebalancing. When ISPs compete, it could lead to a fragmented internet where only one firm offers the application. We show that, both in monopoly and duopoly, prohibiting the exclusion of the app and surcharges for its use ‚Aia strong form of net neutrality‚Ai is not welfare improving.","PeriodicalId":306463,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","volume":"37 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing One-Way Essential Complements: The Forgotten Side of Net Neutrality\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Broos, A. Gautier\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2570924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze the incentives of internet service providers (ISPs) to break net neutrality by excluding internet applications competing with their own products, a typical example being the exclusion of VoIP applications by telecom companies offering internet and voice services. Exclusion is not a concern when the ISP is a monopoly because it can extract the additional surplus created by the application through price rebalancing. When ISPs compete, it could lead to a fragmented internet where only one firm offers the application. We show that, both in monopoly and duopoly, prohibiting the exclusion of the app and surcharges for its use ‚Aia strong form of net neutrality‚Ai is not welfare improving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"37 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2570924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2570924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们分析了互联网服务提供商(isp)通过排除与自己产品竞争的互联网应用程序来打破网络中立性的动机,一个典型的例子是提供互联网和语音服务的电信公司排除VoIP应用程序。当ISP是垄断时,排除不是一个问题,因为它可以通过价格再平衡提取应用程序产生的额外盈余。当互联网服务提供商相互竞争时,可能会导致互联网碎片化,只有一家公司提供应用程序。我们表明,无论是在垄断还是双寡头垄断中,禁止排除应用程序并对其使用收取附加费,这是一种强有力的网络中立性形式,Ai并没有改善福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competing One-Way Essential Complements: The Forgotten Side of Net Neutrality
We analyze the incentives of internet service providers (ISPs) to break net neutrality by excluding internet applications competing with their own products, a typical example being the exclusion of VoIP applications by telecom companies offering internet and voice services. Exclusion is not a concern when the ISP is a monopoly because it can extract the additional surplus created by the application through price rebalancing. When ISPs compete, it could lead to a fragmented internet where only one firm offers the application. We show that, both in monopoly and duopoly, prohibiting the exclusion of the app and surcharges for its use ‚Aia strong form of net neutrality‚Ai is not welfare improving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Competition Overdose': Curing Markets from Themselves? Ten Points for Discussion Exploitative Abuses: Recent Trends and Comparative Perspectives Setting the Edge: How the NCAA Can Defend Amateurism by Allowing Third Party Compensation Competition in Digital Markets: A Review of Expert Reports The Israeli Statute on National Book Price Maintenance - A Critical Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1