政策分析和政府沟通解散伊斯兰捍卫者阵线(FPI)

Pitoyo Ismail, Edy Prihantoro, N. Ohorella
{"title":"政策分析和政府沟通解散伊斯兰捍卫者阵线(FPI)","authors":"Pitoyo Ismail, Edy Prihantoro, N. Ohorella","doi":"10.32509/wacana.v20i2.1590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The news of the prohibition of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia against the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) seized the public's attention. Several national media such as kompas.com, detik.com and republica.co.id have different points of view. Each media reported this phenomenon with different framing according to media ideology. The purpose of this research is to see the news framing of the news of the ban on the Government of the Republic of Indonesia against the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) in the national online mass media. Methodologically this research uses a constructivism approach by applying textual analysis consisting of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the form of framing analysis. In addition, using intertextual analysis which includes analysis of text production and socio-cultural framing Robert Enmant. The results showed different frames on the 3 online portals. Kompas.com frames FPI news with a humanism frame, seeing the social impact of FPI's presence in society. The legal basis for the disbandment of FPI is clearly explained to show the truth to the public. Detik.com is almost the same as Kompas.com in framing the FPI phenomenon, by showing data and the fact that FPI has not yet received a permit again due to the organization's AD/ART problems. This is different from the Republika online frame which frames this reality in a straightforward manner, by showing evidence that FPI continues to fight injustice. The formation of negative opinions continues to be fought to provide a correct understanding of the community.","PeriodicalId":251187,"journal":{"name":"WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN DAN KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH DALAM MEMBUBARKAN FRONT PEMBELA ISLAM (FPI)\",\"authors\":\"Pitoyo Ismail, Edy Prihantoro, N. Ohorella\",\"doi\":\"10.32509/wacana.v20i2.1590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The news of the prohibition of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia against the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) seized the public's attention. Several national media such as kompas.com, detik.com and republica.co.id have different points of view. Each media reported this phenomenon with different framing according to media ideology. The purpose of this research is to see the news framing of the news of the ban on the Government of the Republic of Indonesia against the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) in the national online mass media. Methodologically this research uses a constructivism approach by applying textual analysis consisting of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the form of framing analysis. In addition, using intertextual analysis which includes analysis of text production and socio-cultural framing Robert Enmant. The results showed different frames on the 3 online portals. Kompas.com frames FPI news with a humanism frame, seeing the social impact of FPI's presence in society. The legal basis for the disbandment of FPI is clearly explained to show the truth to the public. Detik.com is almost the same as Kompas.com in framing the FPI phenomenon, by showing data and the fact that FPI has not yet received a permit again due to the organization's AD/ART problems. This is different from the Republika online frame which frames this reality in a straightforward manner, by showing evidence that FPI continues to fight injustice. The formation of negative opinions continues to be fought to provide a correct understanding of the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v20i2.1590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v20i2.1590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

印度尼西亚共和国政府禁止打击伊斯兰捍卫者阵线的消息引起了公众的注意。几家全国性媒体,如kompas.com、detik.com和republica.co.id都有不同的观点。根据媒体意识形态的不同,各媒体对这一现象的报道有着不同的框架。这项研究的目的是了解印尼共和国政府对伊斯兰捍卫者阵线(FPI)的禁令在全国网络大众媒体上的新闻框架。在方法论上,本研究采用建构主义的研究方法,以框架分析的形式运用定量和定性的文本分析方法。此外,使用互文分析,其中包括分析文本生产和社会文化框架。结果显示,3个在线门户网站的框架不同。康普网以人文主义的框架来看待FPI新闻,看到FPI在社会中的存在所带来的社会影响。为了向公众展示真相,明确了解散FPI的法律依据。Detik.com在描述FPI现象方面与Kompas.com几乎相同,通过展示数据和FPI由于组织的AD/ART问题尚未再次获得许可的事实。这与Republika的在线框架不同,后者通过显示FPI继续与不公正作斗争的证据,以直截了当的方式描绘了这一现实。不断与负面舆论的形成作斗争,为社会提供正确的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN DAN KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH DALAM MEMBUBARKAN FRONT PEMBELA ISLAM (FPI)
The news of the prohibition of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia against the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) seized the public's attention. Several national media such as kompas.com, detik.com and republica.co.id have different points of view. Each media reported this phenomenon with different framing according to media ideology. The purpose of this research is to see the news framing of the news of the ban on the Government of the Republic of Indonesia against the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) in the national online mass media. Methodologically this research uses a constructivism approach by applying textual analysis consisting of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the form of framing analysis. In addition, using intertextual analysis which includes analysis of text production and socio-cultural framing Robert Enmant. The results showed different frames on the 3 online portals. Kompas.com frames FPI news with a humanism frame, seeing the social impact of FPI's presence in society. The legal basis for the disbandment of FPI is clearly explained to show the truth to the public. Detik.com is almost the same as Kompas.com in framing the FPI phenomenon, by showing data and the fact that FPI has not yet received a permit again due to the organization's AD/ART problems. This is different from the Republika online frame which frames this reality in a straightforward manner, by showing evidence that FPI continues to fight injustice. The formation of negative opinions continues to be fought to provide a correct understanding of the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tantangan Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility Perusahaan Saat Pandemi Covid-19 Tahun 2020-2022 Penerapan Omnichannel Untuk Caring Pelanggan Indihome Pada Customer Care Telkom Witel Bandung Peran Komunikasi Hexahelix Dalam Konstruksi Sosial Mitigasi Covid-19 Pada Masyarakat Badui Luar Cultural Proximity of Korean and Indonesian in Korean Dramas The Korean Wave as the Globalization of South Korean Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1