用GPS位置和OBDII速度传感器测量老年驾驶员的车辆加速度

R. B. Wallace, Michael Rockwood, R. Goubran, F. Knoefel, S. Marshall, M. Porter
{"title":"用GPS位置和OBDII速度传感器测量老年驾驶员的车辆加速度","authors":"R. B. Wallace, Michael Rockwood, R. Goubran, F. Knoefel, S. Marshall, M. Porter","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates the validity of vehicle acceleration/deceleration signals derived from 1Hz sampled GPS position and OBDII velocity sensors through comparison to 40Hz sampled accelerometer measurements. Measurement of driver acceleration and deceleration is important because it is a key measure of driving habits. Ideally, these measurements should not require the cost and complexity of installing dedicated accelerometers for long term studies when alternatives are available. The OBDII interface is built-in and GPS sensors can be easily deployed and both are shown to allow derivation of alternative acceleration signals. The results show a maximum average correlation of 0.810 between the GPS and the accelerometers and 0.808 between the OBDII and the accelerometer. This paper analyzes the effects of noise on each of the derivative difference equations and shows that the Central 2-point formula provides the best noise performance whereas the Central 4-point formula (correlation 0.801) would be expected to provide the best performance in a noise free signal. Forward/Backward 3-point are predicted to have similar performance to Central 2-point in noise free signals but are shown to have poor performance (correlation of 0.667 and 0.687 respectively) in the presence of noise.","PeriodicalId":277757,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","volume":"169 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of vehicle acceleration in studies of older drivers from GPS position and OBDII velocity sensors\",\"authors\":\"R. B. Wallace, Michael Rockwood, R. Goubran, F. Knoefel, S. Marshall, M. Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper demonstrates the validity of vehicle acceleration/deceleration signals derived from 1Hz sampled GPS position and OBDII velocity sensors through comparison to 40Hz sampled accelerometer measurements. Measurement of driver acceleration and deceleration is important because it is a key measure of driving habits. Ideally, these measurements should not require the cost and complexity of installing dedicated accelerometers for long term studies when alternatives are available. The OBDII interface is built-in and GPS sensors can be easily deployed and both are shown to allow derivation of alternative acceleration signals. The results show a maximum average correlation of 0.810 between the GPS and the accelerometers and 0.808 between the OBDII and the accelerometer. This paper analyzes the effects of noise on each of the derivative difference equations and shows that the Central 2-point formula provides the best noise performance whereas the Central 4-point formula (correlation 0.801) would be expected to provide the best performance in a noise free signal. Forward/Backward 3-point are predicted to have similar performance to Central 2-point in noise free signals but are shown to have poor performance (correlation of 0.667 and 0.687 respectively) in the presence of noise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本文通过与40Hz采样加速度计测量结果的比较,证明了1Hz采样GPS位置和OBDII速度传感器获得的车辆加速/减速信号的有效性。驾驶员加速和减速的测量很重要,因为它是衡量驾驶习惯的关键指标。理想情况下,这些测量不需要为长期研究安装专用加速度计的成本和复杂性。OBDII接口是内置的,GPS传感器可以很容易地部署,两者都显示允许派生替代加速信号。结果表明,GPS与加速度计的最大平均相关系数为0.810,OBDII与加速度计的最大平均相关系数为0.808。本文分析了噪声对每个微分差分方程的影响,并表明中心2点公式提供了最佳的噪声性能,而中心4点公式(相关性0.801)将有望在无噪声信号中提供最佳性能。预测前向/后向3点在无噪声信号中具有与中央2点相似的性能,但在存在噪声时表现出较差的性能(相关性分别为0.667和0.687)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement of vehicle acceleration in studies of older drivers from GPS position and OBDII velocity sensors
This paper demonstrates the validity of vehicle acceleration/deceleration signals derived from 1Hz sampled GPS position and OBDII velocity sensors through comparison to 40Hz sampled accelerometer measurements. Measurement of driver acceleration and deceleration is important because it is a key measure of driving habits. Ideally, these measurements should not require the cost and complexity of installing dedicated accelerometers for long term studies when alternatives are available. The OBDII interface is built-in and GPS sensors can be easily deployed and both are shown to allow derivation of alternative acceleration signals. The results show a maximum average correlation of 0.810 between the GPS and the accelerometers and 0.808 between the OBDII and the accelerometer. This paper analyzes the effects of noise on each of the derivative difference equations and shows that the Central 2-point formula provides the best noise performance whereas the Central 4-point formula (correlation 0.801) would be expected to provide the best performance in a noise free signal. Forward/Backward 3-point are predicted to have similar performance to Central 2-point in noise free signals but are shown to have poor performance (correlation of 0.667 and 0.687 respectively) in the presence of noise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needle detection by electro-localization for a needle EMG exam robotic simulator Evaluation of control modes for head motion-based control with motion sensors A novel automatically initialized level set approach based on region correlation for lumbar vertebrae CT image segmentation Smart environments using near-field communication and HTML5 New FEM 3D model for arm-cuff interface simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1