{"title":"从<s:1>莱曼Şükrü《Seyahatü l k<e:1> bra》和康有为《土耳其游记》看奥斯曼帝国与清朝的比较","authors":"Fatma Ecem Ceylan","doi":"10.30613/curesosc.1267199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1906, Traveller Karçınzade Süleyman Şükrü, starting from Anatolia, travelled to Iran, Ashgabat, Bukhara, Baku, West Turkistan, Caucasus, Austria, France, Marseille, African Continent, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Egypt, Aden, India, Kolkata, Colombo, Ceylon, Singapore and China and reached Russia as the last stop, St. Petersburg. During this trip, he also brought his notes together in his work named Seyahatü'l Kübra. The impressions of China found in Seyahatü'l Kübra are grouped under eleven headings. These are details of the outer seas through which the traveller crosses until he reaches Shanghai, Beijing, Taku Port, the Pier of Hong Kong; the sea to the east of the Indian Peninsula, the Pacific Ocean, Tin-i China (Tianjin), Beijing, Cancaku, Lancosin (Lanzhou), Hoço (Hezhou), Hami, Urumqi. Şükrü tried to reveal clear data about China's outer seas, rivers, architecture of cities, temples, mosques, the situation of European states in China, what foreigners do, and the number of Muslims and mosques in the section of impressions of China. \nSimilarly, in 1908, Kang Youwei, who came to Ottoman Empire, which he called the Turkish Country, collected his travel notes under the title of Turk Travelogue. In his travelogue, he gave detailed information about the political structure, military structure, education, architecture and historical places of the Turks. By comparing many points which he witnessed in Ottoman Empire with his own country or European countries, he examined the similarities or differences of these countries with the Ottoman Empire. \nThe importance of these two travelogues stems from the fact that the periods in which the travellers travelled correspond to the same periods and that they witnessed almost the same events in terms of periods even though they were in two different countries. The aim of this study, which is a comparative study, is to examine the similarities and differences between the two countries in line with the perspectives of Şükrü and Kang. For this reason, in addition to the comparison method, content analysis, text scanning and text analysis methods will be adopted as a review method in the study.","PeriodicalId":344498,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Social Sciences","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ottoman Empire and Qing Dynasty through Süleyman Şükrü's Seyahatü'l Kübra and Kang Youwei's Turk Travelogue\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Ecem Ceylan\",\"doi\":\"10.30613/curesosc.1267199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1906, Traveller Karçınzade Süleyman Şükrü, starting from Anatolia, travelled to Iran, Ashgabat, Bukhara, Baku, West Turkistan, Caucasus, Austria, France, Marseille, African Continent, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Egypt, Aden, India, Kolkata, Colombo, Ceylon, Singapore and China and reached Russia as the last stop, St. Petersburg. During this trip, he also brought his notes together in his work named Seyahatü'l Kübra. The impressions of China found in Seyahatü'l Kübra are grouped under eleven headings. These are details of the outer seas through which the traveller crosses until he reaches Shanghai, Beijing, Taku Port, the Pier of Hong Kong; the sea to the east of the Indian Peninsula, the Pacific Ocean, Tin-i China (Tianjin), Beijing, Cancaku, Lancosin (Lanzhou), Hoço (Hezhou), Hami, Urumqi. Şükrü tried to reveal clear data about China's outer seas, rivers, architecture of cities, temples, mosques, the situation of European states in China, what foreigners do, and the number of Muslims and mosques in the section of impressions of China. \\nSimilarly, in 1908, Kang Youwei, who came to Ottoman Empire, which he called the Turkish Country, collected his travel notes under the title of Turk Travelogue. In his travelogue, he gave detailed information about the political structure, military structure, education, architecture and historical places of the Turks. By comparing many points which he witnessed in Ottoman Empire with his own country or European countries, he examined the similarities or differences of these countries with the Ottoman Empire. \\nThe importance of these two travelogues stems from the fact that the periods in which the travellers travelled correspond to the same periods and that they witnessed almost the same events in terms of periods even though they were in two different countries. The aim of this study, which is a comparative study, is to examine the similarities and differences between the two countries in line with the perspectives of Şükrü and Kang. For this reason, in addition to the comparison method, content analysis, text scanning and text analysis methods will be adopted as a review method in the study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1267199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1267199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
1906年,旅行家Karçınzade sellleyman Şükrü从安纳托利亚出发,游历了伊朗、阿什哈巴德、布哈拉、巴库、西突厥斯坦、高加索、奥地利、法国、马赛、非洲大陆、突尼斯、摩洛哥、阿尔及利亚、埃及、亚丁、印度、加尔各答、科伦坡、锡兰、新加坡和中国,最后到达俄罗斯的圣彼得堡。在这次旅行中,他还把他的笔记汇集在他的作品Seyahatü'l k bra中。在Seyahatü'l k bra中发现的中国印象分为11个标题。这些是旅行者穿过的外海的细节,直到他到达上海、北京、大库港、香港码头;东临印度洋半岛、太平洋、天津(天津)、北京、坎库、兰科辛(兰州)、贺州、哈密、乌鲁木齐。Şükrü在“中国印象”部分,试图展示中国的外海、河流、城市建筑、寺庙、清真寺、欧洲国家在中国的情况、外国人的活动、穆斯林和清真寺的数量等清晰的数据。同样,1908年,康有为来到他称之为土耳其国的奥斯曼帝国,收集了他的游记,并以《土耳其游记》为题。在他的游记中,他详细介绍了土耳其人的政治结构、军事结构、教育、建筑和历史遗迹。通过将他在奥斯曼帝国与他自己的国家或欧洲国家所看到的许多方面进行比较,他研究了这些国家与奥斯曼帝国的异同。这两本游记之所以重要,是因为这两位旅行者所经历的时期是相同的,而且他们在两个不同的国家目睹了几乎相同的事件。本研究是一项比较研究,目的是根据Şükrü和Kang的观点来考察两国之间的异同。因此,在研究中除了采用对比法外,还将采用内容分析法、文本扫描法和文本分析法作为复习方法。
Comparison of Ottoman Empire and Qing Dynasty through Süleyman Şükrü's Seyahatü'l Kübra and Kang Youwei's Turk Travelogue
In 1906, Traveller Karçınzade Süleyman Şükrü, starting from Anatolia, travelled to Iran, Ashgabat, Bukhara, Baku, West Turkistan, Caucasus, Austria, France, Marseille, African Continent, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Egypt, Aden, India, Kolkata, Colombo, Ceylon, Singapore and China and reached Russia as the last stop, St. Petersburg. During this trip, he also brought his notes together in his work named Seyahatü'l Kübra. The impressions of China found in Seyahatü'l Kübra are grouped under eleven headings. These are details of the outer seas through which the traveller crosses until he reaches Shanghai, Beijing, Taku Port, the Pier of Hong Kong; the sea to the east of the Indian Peninsula, the Pacific Ocean, Tin-i China (Tianjin), Beijing, Cancaku, Lancosin (Lanzhou), Hoço (Hezhou), Hami, Urumqi. Şükrü tried to reveal clear data about China's outer seas, rivers, architecture of cities, temples, mosques, the situation of European states in China, what foreigners do, and the number of Muslims and mosques in the section of impressions of China.
Similarly, in 1908, Kang Youwei, who came to Ottoman Empire, which he called the Turkish Country, collected his travel notes under the title of Turk Travelogue. In his travelogue, he gave detailed information about the political structure, military structure, education, architecture and historical places of the Turks. By comparing many points which he witnessed in Ottoman Empire with his own country or European countries, he examined the similarities or differences of these countries with the Ottoman Empire.
The importance of these two travelogues stems from the fact that the periods in which the travellers travelled correspond to the same periods and that they witnessed almost the same events in terms of periods even though they were in two different countries. The aim of this study, which is a comparative study, is to examine the similarities and differences between the two countries in line with the perspectives of Şükrü and Kang. For this reason, in addition to the comparison method, content analysis, text scanning and text analysis methods will be adopted as a review method in the study.