利用跑步机五项评分诊断冠状动脉疾病的实验研究

E. Thirumurugan, K. Gomathi, P. Swathy, H. S. Ali Afrin, T. Momeen, R. Famitha, B. Abinayasri
{"title":"利用跑步机五项评分诊断冠状动脉疾病的实验研究","authors":"E. Thirumurugan, K. Gomathi, P. Swathy, H. S. Ali Afrin, T. Momeen, R. Famitha, B. Abinayasri","doi":"10.25259/gjhsr_18_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nExercise is the first step of a cardiovascular stress test, including electrocardiography (ECG) and blood pressure monitoring. Typically, a treadmill or bicycle is used to carry out the exercise for this stress test. Computer-derived criteria and a scoring system have been proposed and tested in hopes of improving the diagnostic accuracy of the exercise ECG for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). Many treadmill scores have not been compared with one another in the same population, so questions remain concerning their diagnostic accuracy. The study aimed to correlate the diagnostic accuracy of ST segment response with various treadmill scores.\n\n\n\nA total of 100 consecutive patients with suspected CAD referred for exercise testing at ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, between December 2021 and June 2022 were included in the study. The Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol at our institution, and all patients provided written informed consent. A treadmill test was conducted using commercially available equipment. All patients were subjected to symptom-limited exercise testing following the standard Bruce and modified Bruce protocols. A series of five scores were calculated using data collected from the patients to calculate the probability of CAD occurrence.\n\n\n\nThe study included 100 patients with an average age of 48.4 ± 1 years. Obesity (41%), hypertension (80%), diabetes (86%), current smokers (62%), family history of CAD (46%), and hypercholesterolemia (46%) were all observed in the study. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) plot’s area under the curve (AUC) (standard error) for the Detrano score was 0.46 ± 0.59. This was significantly lower than the AUC of each treadmill score. The AUC of the ROC plots of the Duke treadmill score (DTS), veterans affairs (VA), and consensus scores were 0.47 ± 0.58, 0.63 ± 0.56, and 0.61 ± 0.57, respectively.\n\n\n\nThe Morise score remains helpful in our study population for detecting CAD and determining risk strata. DTS and Detrano had comparable accuracy when calculated from intermediate and high probability scores and ST responses (44% and 43%, respectively). VA and consensus had lower accuracy than others (37% and 29%, respectively).\n","PeriodicalId":369069,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experimental study to diagnose coronary artery disease using five treadmill scores\",\"authors\":\"E. Thirumurugan, K. Gomathi, P. Swathy, H. S. Ali Afrin, T. Momeen, R. Famitha, B. Abinayasri\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/gjhsr_18_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nExercise is the first step of a cardiovascular stress test, including electrocardiography (ECG) and blood pressure monitoring. Typically, a treadmill or bicycle is used to carry out the exercise for this stress test. Computer-derived criteria and a scoring system have been proposed and tested in hopes of improving the diagnostic accuracy of the exercise ECG for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). Many treadmill scores have not been compared with one another in the same population, so questions remain concerning their diagnostic accuracy. The study aimed to correlate the diagnostic accuracy of ST segment response with various treadmill scores.\\n\\n\\n\\nA total of 100 consecutive patients with suspected CAD referred for exercise testing at ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, between December 2021 and June 2022 were included in the study. The Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol at our institution, and all patients provided written informed consent. A treadmill test was conducted using commercially available equipment. All patients were subjected to symptom-limited exercise testing following the standard Bruce and modified Bruce protocols. A series of five scores were calculated using data collected from the patients to calculate the probability of CAD occurrence.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe study included 100 patients with an average age of 48.4 ± 1 years. Obesity (41%), hypertension (80%), diabetes (86%), current smokers (62%), family history of CAD (46%), and hypercholesterolemia (46%) were all observed in the study. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) plot’s area under the curve (AUC) (standard error) for the Detrano score was 0.46 ± 0.59. This was significantly lower than the AUC of each treadmill score. The AUC of the ROC plots of the Duke treadmill score (DTS), veterans affairs (VA), and consensus scores were 0.47 ± 0.58, 0.63 ± 0.56, and 0.61 ± 0.57, respectively.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe Morise score remains helpful in our study population for detecting CAD and determining risk strata. DTS and Detrano had comparable accuracy when calculated from intermediate and high probability scores and ST responses (44% and 43%, respectively). VA and consensus had lower accuracy than others (37% and 29%, respectively).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":369069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/gjhsr_18_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/gjhsr_18_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动是心血管压力测试的第一步,包括心电图(ECG)和血压监测。通常,跑步机或自行车被用来进行这项压力测试。为了提高运动心电图诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的准确性,提出并测试了计算机衍生的标准和评分系统。许多跑步机得分没有在同一人群中相互比较,因此关于其诊断准确性的问题仍然存在。该研究旨在将ST段反应的诊断准确性与各种跑步机评分相关联。在2021年12月至2022年6月期间,在泰米尔纳德邦金奈的ACS医学院和医院接受运动测试的连续100例疑似CAD患者被纳入研究。机构审查委员会批准了我们机构的研究方案,所有患者都提供了书面知情同意书。使用市售设备进行了跑步机测试。所有患者都按照标准布鲁斯和修改布鲁斯方案进行了症状限制运动测试。从患者收集的数据中计算一系列五分,以计算CAD发生的概率。纳入100例患者,平均年龄48.4±1岁。肥胖(41%)、高血压(80%)、糖尿病(86%)、当前吸烟者(62%)、冠心病家族史(46%)和高胆固醇血症(46%)均在研究中被观察到。Detrano评分的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)(标准误差)为0.46±0.59。这明显低于每个跑步机得分的AUC。Duke跑步机评分(DTS)、退伍军人事务评分(VA)和共识评分的ROC曲线AUC分别为0.47±0.58、0.63±0.56和0.61±0.57。Morise评分在我们的研究人群中仍然有助于检测CAD和确定风险阶层。DTS和Detrano在从中概率和高概率得分和ST反应计算时具有相当的准确性(分别为44%和43%)。VA和consensus的准确性低于其他方法(分别为37%和29%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An experimental study to diagnose coronary artery disease using five treadmill scores
Exercise is the first step of a cardiovascular stress test, including electrocardiography (ECG) and blood pressure monitoring. Typically, a treadmill or bicycle is used to carry out the exercise for this stress test. Computer-derived criteria and a scoring system have been proposed and tested in hopes of improving the diagnostic accuracy of the exercise ECG for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). Many treadmill scores have not been compared with one another in the same population, so questions remain concerning their diagnostic accuracy. The study aimed to correlate the diagnostic accuracy of ST segment response with various treadmill scores. A total of 100 consecutive patients with suspected CAD referred for exercise testing at ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, between December 2021 and June 2022 were included in the study. The Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol at our institution, and all patients provided written informed consent. A treadmill test was conducted using commercially available equipment. All patients were subjected to symptom-limited exercise testing following the standard Bruce and modified Bruce protocols. A series of five scores were calculated using data collected from the patients to calculate the probability of CAD occurrence. The study included 100 patients with an average age of 48.4 ± 1 years. Obesity (41%), hypertension (80%), diabetes (86%), current smokers (62%), family history of CAD (46%), and hypercholesterolemia (46%) were all observed in the study. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) plot’s area under the curve (AUC) (standard error) for the Detrano score was 0.46 ± 0.59. This was significantly lower than the AUC of each treadmill score. The AUC of the ROC plots of the Duke treadmill score (DTS), veterans affairs (VA), and consensus scores were 0.47 ± 0.58, 0.63 ± 0.56, and 0.61 ± 0.57, respectively. The Morise score remains helpful in our study population for detecting CAD and determining risk strata. DTS and Detrano had comparable accuracy when calculated from intermediate and high probability scores and ST responses (44% and 43%, respectively). VA and consensus had lower accuracy than others (37% and 29%, respectively).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare professionals Eating behavior of early adults: A cross-sectional analysis Effect of azithromycin administration in cases of acute bronchiolitis – A systematic review and meta-analysis Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio among preeclampsia patients in India – A systematic review and meta-analysis Unkindest cut of all... unnecessary hysterectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1