{"title":"YouTube是关于淋病的信息来源","authors":"Erhan Kaya, Yavuzalp Solak, B. Koçyiğit","doi":"10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to gonorrhea. \nMethods: Using the search term “gonorrhea”, the first 200 relevant videos on YouTube were saved to a file. All video parameters, including the number of views, likes, dislikes and comments were recorded. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) was used to evaluate the quality of the videos. \nResults: After exclusions, 144 videos were selected and evaluated by two independent observers. The median duration of the videos was calculated as 3.97 minutes. Most videos were provided by physicians (59 videos). According to the GQS scores, 47.9% (n=69) of the videos were evaluated as high quality, 19.4% (n=28) as intermediate quality, and 32.6% (n=47) as low quality. There were significant differences in video length between the high, intermediate, and low-quality groups (p<0.001). \nConclusion: YouTube can be considered an important source of gonorrhea videos.","PeriodicalId":388483,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YOUTUBE AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ABOUT GONORRHEA\",\"authors\":\"Erhan Kaya, Yavuzalp Solak, B. Koçyiğit\",\"doi\":\"10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to gonorrhea. \\nMethods: Using the search term “gonorrhea”, the first 200 relevant videos on YouTube were saved to a file. All video parameters, including the number of views, likes, dislikes and comments were recorded. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) was used to evaluate the quality of the videos. \\nResults: After exclusions, 144 videos were selected and evaluated by two independent observers. The median duration of the videos was calculated as 3.97 minutes. Most videos were provided by physicians (59 videos). According to the GQS scores, 47.9% (n=69) of the videos were evaluated as high quality, 19.4% (n=28) as intermediate quality, and 32.6% (n=47) as low quality. There were significant differences in video length between the high, intermediate, and low-quality groups (p<0.001). \\nConclusion: YouTube can be considered an important source of gonorrhea videos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
YOUTUBE AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ABOUT GONORRHEA
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to gonorrhea.
Methods: Using the search term “gonorrhea”, the first 200 relevant videos on YouTube were saved to a file. All video parameters, including the number of views, likes, dislikes and comments were recorded. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) was used to evaluate the quality of the videos.
Results: After exclusions, 144 videos were selected and evaluated by two independent observers. The median duration of the videos was calculated as 3.97 minutes. Most videos were provided by physicians (59 videos). According to the GQS scores, 47.9% (n=69) of the videos were evaluated as high quality, 19.4% (n=28) as intermediate quality, and 32.6% (n=47) as low quality. There were significant differences in video length between the high, intermediate, and low-quality groups (p<0.001).
Conclusion: YouTube can be considered an important source of gonorrhea videos.