公法与私法学说的趋同——以公共合同为例

J. McLean
{"title":"公法与私法学说的趋同——以公共合同为例","authors":"J. McLean","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2690935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible for public and private law doctrines to converge in response to contemporary modes of mixed public-private governance? Such an approach has certain attractions. It side-steps difficult and often circular a priori assessments of whether a transaction or body is sufficiently “public” or “commercial”, and it sometimes provides a space in which the countervailing threats of public corruption and private coercion can be weighed. Three examples of modern convergence are identified in relation to public contracts: the law of public tendering; controls on contractual discretion; and the concept of non-delegable duties in tort law which impacts on contracting out.","PeriodicalId":180020,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence in Public and Private Law Doctrines - The Case of Public Contracts\",\"authors\":\"J. McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2690935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is it possible for public and private law doctrines to converge in response to contemporary modes of mixed public-private governance? Such an approach has certain attractions. It side-steps difficult and often circular a priori assessments of whether a transaction or body is sufficiently “public” or “commercial”, and it sometimes provides a space in which the countervailing threats of public corruption and private coercion can be weighed. Three examples of modern convergence are identified in relation to public contracts: the law of public tendering; controls on contractual discretion; and the concept of non-delegable duties in tort law which impacts on contracting out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2690935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2690935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

公法和私法理论是否有可能趋同,以应对当代公私混合治理模式?这种方法有一定的吸引力。它回避了对交易或机构是否足够“公共”或“商业”的困难且往往是循环的先验评估,有时它提供了一个空间,可以权衡公共腐败和私人胁迫的反抵消威胁。在公共合同方面确定了三个现代趋同的例子:公开招标法;控制合同自由裁量权;以及侵权法中不可委托义务的概念对外包的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convergence in Public and Private Law Doctrines - The Case of Public Contracts
Is it possible for public and private law doctrines to converge in response to contemporary modes of mixed public-private governance? Such an approach has certain attractions. It side-steps difficult and often circular a priori assessments of whether a transaction or body is sufficiently “public” or “commercial”, and it sometimes provides a space in which the countervailing threats of public corruption and private coercion can be weighed. Three examples of modern convergence are identified in relation to public contracts: the law of public tendering; controls on contractual discretion; and the concept of non-delegable duties in tort law which impacts on contracting out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Illusory Promise of Free Enterprise: A Primer for Promoting Racially Diverse Entrepreneurship Disruptive Innovation and Sunset Clauses: The Case of Uber and Other on Demand Transportation Networks Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Practice in Africa Company Law is Bananas Convergence in Public and Private Law Doctrines - The Case of Public Contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1