知识产权高等法院创设的法律原则和组织原则

O. Drozdov, M.Yu. Pototskyi
{"title":"知识产权高等法院创设的法律原则和组织原则","authors":"O. Drozdov, M.Yu. Pototskyi","doi":"10.33731/22022.259743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keywords: litigation, intellectual property law, High Court of Intellectual Property,European Union law\nAnalysis of the legal and organizational supportfor the establishment of the High court of intellectual property revealed a scientificproblem regarding the lack of implementation of the constitutional provision accordingto which higher specialized courts may act in accordance with the law, the absenceof the Law of Ukraine «On the High Court of Intellectual Property» proceduralnorms that should ensure the activities of this court to hear cases on intellectualproperty rights.The purpose of the article is to analyze the key legal and organizational issues ofthe creation of IP-court, the main provisions of the draft special law on this court,identify gaps in procedural law, and develop proposals for their content.To achieve this goal, the history and main problems of the establishment and operationof IP-court, international experience of this judicial body, the draft Law ofUkraine «On the High Court of Intellectual Property», some provisions of legal acts ofthe European Union.The main theoretical and practical problems that actualize the urgency of the beginningof IP-court activity are formulated. It is noted that in view of the Europeanintegration vector of Ukraine's legal system, the administration of justice will belargely conditioned by legal acts of the European Union, so it is advisable to providethis court with procedural tools inherent in EU law.It is concluded that the creation and operation of IP-Court is due to the deepening ofeconomic globalization, dynamic development of technological innovation, which in thecase of integration of the Court into the international justice system will lead to internationalizationand openness of intellectual property protection in the European space.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal and organizational principles of creation high court of intellectual property\",\"authors\":\"O. Drozdov, M.Yu. Pototskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.33731/22022.259743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keywords: litigation, intellectual property law, High Court of Intellectual Property,European Union law\\nAnalysis of the legal and organizational supportfor the establishment of the High court of intellectual property revealed a scientificproblem regarding the lack of implementation of the constitutional provision accordingto which higher specialized courts may act in accordance with the law, the absenceof the Law of Ukraine «On the High Court of Intellectual Property» proceduralnorms that should ensure the activities of this court to hear cases on intellectualproperty rights.The purpose of the article is to analyze the key legal and organizational issues ofthe creation of IP-court, the main provisions of the draft special law on this court,identify gaps in procedural law, and develop proposals for their content.To achieve this goal, the history and main problems of the establishment and operationof IP-court, international experience of this judicial body, the draft Law ofUkraine «On the High Court of Intellectual Property», some provisions of legal acts ofthe European Union.The main theoretical and practical problems that actualize the urgency of the beginningof IP-court activity are formulated. It is noted that in view of the Europeanintegration vector of Ukraine's legal system, the administration of justice will belargely conditioned by legal acts of the European Union, so it is advisable to providethis court with procedural tools inherent in EU law.It is concluded that the creation and operation of IP-Court is due to the deepening ofeconomic globalization, dynamic development of technological innovation, which in thecase of integration of the Court into the international justice system will lead to internationalizationand openness of intellectual property protection in the European space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33731/22022.259743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/22022.259743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关键词:对建立知识产权高等法院的法律和组织支持的分析揭示了一个科学问题,即缺乏执行宪法规定,根据宪法规定,高级专门法院可以依法行事。缺乏乌克兰《知识产权高等法院法》的程序规范,该规范应确保该法院审理知识产权案件的活动。本文的目的是分析知识产权法院设立的关键法律问题和组织问题,以及知识产权法院特别法草案的主要规定,找出程序法上的空白,并对其内容提出建议。为了实现这一目标,知识产权法院建立和运作的历史和主要问题,该司法机构的国际经验,乌克兰“知识产权高等法院”法律草案,欧盟法律行为的一些规定。阐述了实现知识产权法院活动开展紧迫性的主要理论和实践问题。值得注意的是,鉴于乌克兰法律体系的欧洲一体化矢量,司法行政将在很大程度上取决于欧盟的法律行为,因此建议为该法院提供欧盟法律固有的程序工具。知识产权法院的创建和运作是由于经济全球化的深化,技术创新的蓬勃发展,在法院融入国际司法体系的情况下,将导致欧洲空间知识产权保护的国际化和开放性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal and organizational principles of creation high court of intellectual property
Keywords: litigation, intellectual property law, High Court of Intellectual Property,European Union law Analysis of the legal and organizational supportfor the establishment of the High court of intellectual property revealed a scientificproblem regarding the lack of implementation of the constitutional provision accordingto which higher specialized courts may act in accordance with the law, the absenceof the Law of Ukraine «On the High Court of Intellectual Property» proceduralnorms that should ensure the activities of this court to hear cases on intellectualproperty rights.The purpose of the article is to analyze the key legal and organizational issues ofthe creation of IP-court, the main provisions of the draft special law on this court,identify gaps in procedural law, and develop proposals for their content.To achieve this goal, the history and main problems of the establishment and operationof IP-court, international experience of this judicial body, the draft Law ofUkraine «On the High Court of Intellectual Property», some provisions of legal acts ofthe European Union.The main theoretical and practical problems that actualize the urgency of the beginningof IP-court activity are formulated. It is noted that in view of the Europeanintegration vector of Ukraine's legal system, the administration of justice will belargely conditioned by legal acts of the European Union, so it is advisable to providethis court with procedural tools inherent in EU law.It is concluded that the creation and operation of IP-Court is due to the deepening ofeconomic globalization, dynamic development of technological innovation, which in thecase of integration of the Court into the international justice system will lead to internationalizationand openness of intellectual property protection in the European space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accelerated examination of patent applications for «green» technologies: foreign experience for Ukraine Draft Regulation of the European Union about artificial intelligence and related initiatives Intellectual property rights in the context of biology, medicine and pharmacy: a look into the future The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation ABUSE OF PATENTABILITY CRITERIA WHEN PATENTING INVENTIONS RELATED TO MEDICINES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1